随着时间的推移,自我报告的种族和民族的一致性:提高归因的准确性和充分利用自我报告的意义。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002090
Ann Haas, Steven C Martino, Amelia M Haviland, Megan K Beckett, Jacob W Dembosky, Joy Binion, Torrey Hill, Marc N Elliott
{"title":"随着时间的推移,自我报告的种族和民族的一致性:提高归因的准确性和充分利用自我报告的意义。","authors":"Ann Haas, Steven C Martino, Amelia M Haviland, Megan K Beckett, Jacob W Dembosky, Joy Binion, Torrey Hill, Marc N Elliott","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname and Geocoding (MBISG), which augments an imperfect race-and-ethnicity administrative variable to estimate probabilities that people would self-identify as being in each of 6 mutually exclusive racial-and-ethnic groups, performs very well for Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (AA&NHPI), Black, Hispanic, and White race-and-ethnicity, somewhat less well for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), and much less well for Multiracial race-and-ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether temporal inconsistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity might limit improvements in approaches like MBISG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) baseline (2013-2018) and 2-year follow-up data (2015-2020), we evaluate the consistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity coded 2 ways: the 6 mutually exclusive MBISG categories and individual endorsements of each racial-and-ethnic group. We compare the consistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity (HOS) to the accuracy of MBISG (using 2021 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concordance (C-statistic) of HOS baseline and follow-up self-reported race-and-ethnicity was 0.95-0.97 for AA&NHPI, Black, Hispanic, and White, 0.83 for AI/AN, and 0.72 for Multiracial using mutually exclusive categories (weighted concordance=0.956). Concordance of MBISG with self-report followed a similar pattern and had similar values, with somewhat lower AI/AN and Multiracial values. The concordance of individual endorsements over time was somewhat higher than for classification (weighted concordance=0.975).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The concordance of MBISG with self-reported race-and-ethnicity appears to be limited by the consistency of self-report for some racial-and-ethnic groups when employing the 6-mutually-exclusive category approach. The use of individual endorsements can improve the consistency of self-reported data. Reconfiguring algorithms such as MBISG in this form could improve its overall performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"63 2","pages":"106-110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency in Self-Reported Race-and-Ethnicity Over Time: Implications for Improving the Accuracy of Imputations and Making the Best Use of Self-Report.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Haas, Steven C Martino, Amelia M Haviland, Megan K Beckett, Jacob W Dembosky, Joy Binion, Torrey Hill, Marc N Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname and Geocoding (MBISG), which augments an imperfect race-and-ethnicity administrative variable to estimate probabilities that people would self-identify as being in each of 6 mutually exclusive racial-and-ethnic groups, performs very well for Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (AA&NHPI), Black, Hispanic, and White race-and-ethnicity, somewhat less well for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), and much less well for Multiracial race-and-ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether temporal inconsistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity might limit improvements in approaches like MBISG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) baseline (2013-2018) and 2-year follow-up data (2015-2020), we evaluate the consistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity coded 2 ways: the 6 mutually exclusive MBISG categories and individual endorsements of each racial-and-ethnic group. We compare the consistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity (HOS) to the accuracy of MBISG (using 2021 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concordance (C-statistic) of HOS baseline and follow-up self-reported race-and-ethnicity was 0.95-0.97 for AA&NHPI, Black, Hispanic, and White, 0.83 for AI/AN, and 0.72 for Multiracial using mutually exclusive categories (weighted concordance=0.956). Concordance of MBISG with self-report followed a similar pattern and had similar values, with somewhat lower AI/AN and Multiracial values. The concordance of individual endorsements over time was somewhat higher than for classification (weighted concordance=0.975).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The concordance of MBISG with self-reported race-and-ethnicity appears to be limited by the consistency of self-report for some racial-and-ethnic groups when employing the 6-mutually-exclusive category approach. The use of individual endorsements can improve the consistency of self-reported data. Reconfiguring algorithms such as MBISG in this form could improve its overall performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"106-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保险贝叶斯改进姓氏和地理编码(MBISG),它增加了一个不完美的种族和民族管理变量,以估计人们将自我认同为6个相互排斥的种族和民族中的每一个的概率,在亚裔美国人和夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民(AA&NHPI),黑人,西班牙裔和白人种族和民族中表现得很好,在美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/ an)中表现得稍差。而多种族的种族和民族就不那么好了。目的:评估自我报告的种族和民族的时间不一致性是否会限制MBISG等方法的改进。方法:采用美国医疗保险健康结局调查(HOS)基线(2013-2018年)和2年随访数据(2015-2020年),以6个相互排斥的MBISG类别和每个种族和民族的个人认可两种方式评估自我报告的种族和民族编码的一致性。我们比较了自我报告的种族和民族(HOS)的一致性与MBISG的准确性(使用2021年医疗保健提供者和系统数据的医疗保险消费者评估)。结果:美国黑人和非裔美国人、黑人、西班牙裔和白人的HOS基线和随访自我报告的种族和民族的一致性(c统计量)为0.95 ~ 0.97,AI/AN的一致性为0.83,多种族的一致性为0.72(加权一致性=0.956)。MBISG与自我报告的一致性具有相似的模式和相似的值,但AI/AN和多种族值略低。个体背书随时间的一致性略高于分类(加权一致性=0.975)。结论:当采用6个互斥类别方法时,MBISG与自我报告的种族和民族的一致性似乎受到一些种族和民族自我报告的一致性的限制。使用个人背书可以提高自我报告数据的一致性。以这种形式重新配置MBISG等算法可以提高其整体性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consistency in Self-Reported Race-and-Ethnicity Over Time: Implications for Improving the Accuracy of Imputations and Making the Best Use of Self-Report.

Background: Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname and Geocoding (MBISG), which augments an imperfect race-and-ethnicity administrative variable to estimate probabilities that people would self-identify as being in each of 6 mutually exclusive racial-and-ethnic groups, performs very well for Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (AA&NHPI), Black, Hispanic, and White race-and-ethnicity, somewhat less well for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), and much less well for Multiracial race-and-ethnicity.

Objectives: To assess whether temporal inconsistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity might limit improvements in approaches like MBISG.

Methods: Using the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) baseline (2013-2018) and 2-year follow-up data (2015-2020), we evaluate the consistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity coded 2 ways: the 6 mutually exclusive MBISG categories and individual endorsements of each racial-and-ethnic group. We compare the consistency of self-reported race-and-ethnicity (HOS) to the accuracy of MBISG (using 2021 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data).

Results: Concordance (C-statistic) of HOS baseline and follow-up self-reported race-and-ethnicity was 0.95-0.97 for AA&NHPI, Black, Hispanic, and White, 0.83 for AI/AN, and 0.72 for Multiracial using mutually exclusive categories (weighted concordance=0.956). Concordance of MBISG with self-report followed a similar pattern and had similar values, with somewhat lower AI/AN and Multiracial values. The concordance of individual endorsements over time was somewhat higher than for classification (weighted concordance=0.975).

Conclusions: The concordance of MBISG with self-reported race-and-ethnicity appears to be limited by the consistency of self-report for some racial-and-ethnic groups when employing the 6-mutually-exclusive category approach. The use of individual endorsements can improve the consistency of self-reported data. Reconfiguring algorithms such as MBISG in this form could improve its overall performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Chronic Disease and Future Perceptions of Financial Control: Results From the Midlife in the United States Cohort Study. The Link Between Perceived Racism and Health Services Utilization Among Older Adults: An Analysis of Commonwealth Fund's 2021 International Health Policy Survey. Outcomes of Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury: A Cohort Study of US Veterans. Factors Associated With Psychotherapist and Psychiatrist Participation in Public Insurance: Evidence From Georgia State. Medicare Accountable Care Organization Treatment of Serious Mental Illness: Associations Between Behavioral Health Integration Activities and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1