{"title":"总结性评估中的“主观性”与“客观性”的比喻。","authors":"John Norcini","doi":"10.1111/medu.15606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reflecting on the long-observed dichotomy between ‘objective’ and ‘subjective’ assessments, Norcini suggests that all assessments are based on judgments and, hence, we need to be cautious when drawing implications from the distinction.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"59 4","pages":"360-362"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The trope of ‘subjectivity’ versus ‘objectivity’ in summative assessment\",\"authors\":\"John Norcini\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Reflecting on the long-observed dichotomy between ‘objective’ and ‘subjective’ assessments, Norcini suggests that all assessments are based on judgments and, hence, we need to be cautious when drawing implications from the distinction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"59 4\",\"pages\":\"360-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15606\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15606","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The trope of ‘subjectivity’ versus ‘objectivity’ in summative assessment
Reflecting on the long-observed dichotomy between ‘objective’ and ‘subjective’ assessments, Norcini suggests that all assessments are based on judgments and, hence, we need to be cautious when drawing implications from the distinction.
期刊介绍:
Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives.
The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including;
-undergraduate education
-postgraduate training
-continuing professional development
-interprofessional education