[体外减重预负荷对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺机械功率的影响]。

Wenwen Zhang, Xin'gang Hu, Lixia Yue, Jie Zhang, Zhida Liu, Shuai Gao, Zhigang Zhao, Xinliang Liang
{"title":"[体外减重预负荷对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺机械功率的影响]。","authors":"Wenwen Zhang, Xin'gang Hu, Lixia Yue, Jie Zhang, Zhida Liu, Shuai Gao, Zhigang Zhao, Xinliang Liang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240117-00054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effects of veno-venous extra corporeal carbon dioxide removal (V-V ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) on local mechanical power and gas distribution in the lungs of patients with mild to moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) receiving non-invasive ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective research methods were conducted. Sixty patients with mild to moderate ARDS complicated with renal insufficiency who were transferred to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) through the 96195 platform critical care transport green channel from January 2018 to January 2020 at the collaborative hospitals of Henan Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into a conventional treatment group and an ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group, with 30 patients in each group. Both groups received standard treatments including primary disease treatment, airway management, and non-invasive ventilation. The conventional treatment group received bedside continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and the ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group received V-V ECCO<sub>2</sub>R treatment. General information of patient such as gender, age, cause of disease, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) were recorded; arterial blood gas analysis was performed before treatment and at 12 hours and 24 hours during treatment, recording arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>), and oxygenation index (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>). Respiratory mechanics parameters [tidal volume, respiratory rate, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP)] were recorded, and the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) was calculated; electrical impedance tomography (EIT) was used to measure regional of interest (ROI) values in different lung areas at 12 hours and 24 hours of treatment, and the pulmonary mechanical energy was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The arterial blood gas analysis indicators, respiratory mechanics parameters, and pulmonary mechanical energy of patients in the conventional treatment group and ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group improved significantly after 24 hours of treatment compared to 12 hours of treatment (all P < 0.05). The levels of PaCO<sub>2</sub>, RSBI, total mechanical power, and non-dependent zone mechanical power in the ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group were significantly lower than those in the conventional treatment group at both 12 hours and 24 hours during the treatment [PaCO<sub>2</sub> (mmHg, 1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 44.03±2.96 vs. 49.96±2.50 at 12 hours, 41.65±3.21 vs. 48.53±2.33 at 24 hours; RSBI (times×min<sup>-1</sup>×L<sup>-1</sup>): 88.67±4.05 vs. 92.35±4.03 at 12 hours, 77.66±4.64 vs. 90.98±4.21 at 24 hours; total mechanical power (mJ): 10.40±1.15 vs. 12.93±1.68 at 12 hours, 11.13±1.18 vs. 14.05±1.69 at 24 hours; non-dependent zone mechanical power (mJ): 7.15±0.84 vs. 7.98±0.75 at 12 hours, 7.77±0.93 vs. 9.13±1.10 at 24 hours], and MEP and MIP in the ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group were significantly higher than those in the conventional treatment group at both 12 hours and 24 hours during the treatment [MEP (cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 1 cmH<sub>2</sub>O ≈ 0.098 kPa): 89.88±5.04 vs. 86.09±5.57 at 12 hours, 96.57±2.59 vs. 88.66±2.98 at 24 hours; MIP (cmH<sub>2</sub>O): 47.64±2.82 vs. 41.93±2.44 at 12 hours, 60.11±6.53 vs. 43.63±2.80 at 24 hours], the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>V-V ECCO<sub>2</sub>R combined with non-invasive ventilation can effectively reduce the regional tidal volume, mechanical power, and respiratory rate in the non-gravitational dependent zones of patients with mild to moderate ARDS, and improve respiratory distress and oxygenation status.</p>","PeriodicalId":24079,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","volume":"36 12","pages":"1244-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of extra corporeal reducing pre-load on pulmonary mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome].\",\"authors\":\"Wenwen Zhang, Xin'gang Hu, Lixia Yue, Jie Zhang, Zhida Liu, Shuai Gao, Zhigang Zhao, Xinliang Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240117-00054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effects of veno-venous extra corporeal carbon dioxide removal (V-V ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) on local mechanical power and gas distribution in the lungs of patients with mild to moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) receiving non-invasive ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective research methods were conducted. Sixty patients with mild to moderate ARDS complicated with renal insufficiency who were transferred to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) through the 96195 platform critical care transport green channel from January 2018 to January 2020 at the collaborative hospitals of Henan Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into a conventional treatment group and an ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group, with 30 patients in each group. Both groups received standard treatments including primary disease treatment, airway management, and non-invasive ventilation. The conventional treatment group received bedside continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and the ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group received V-V ECCO<sub>2</sub>R treatment. General information of patient such as gender, age, cause of disease, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) were recorded; arterial blood gas analysis was performed before treatment and at 12 hours and 24 hours during treatment, recording arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>), and oxygenation index (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>). Respiratory mechanics parameters [tidal volume, respiratory rate, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP)] were recorded, and the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) was calculated; electrical impedance tomography (EIT) was used to measure regional of interest (ROI) values in different lung areas at 12 hours and 24 hours of treatment, and the pulmonary mechanical energy was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The arterial blood gas analysis indicators, respiratory mechanics parameters, and pulmonary mechanical energy of patients in the conventional treatment group and ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group improved significantly after 24 hours of treatment compared to 12 hours of treatment (all P < 0.05). The levels of PaCO<sub>2</sub>, RSBI, total mechanical power, and non-dependent zone mechanical power in the ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group were significantly lower than those in the conventional treatment group at both 12 hours and 24 hours during the treatment [PaCO<sub>2</sub> (mmHg, 1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 44.03±2.96 vs. 49.96±2.50 at 12 hours, 41.65±3.21 vs. 48.53±2.33 at 24 hours; RSBI (times×min<sup>-1</sup>×L<sup>-1</sup>): 88.67±4.05 vs. 92.35±4.03 at 12 hours, 77.66±4.64 vs. 90.98±4.21 at 24 hours; total mechanical power (mJ): 10.40±1.15 vs. 12.93±1.68 at 12 hours, 11.13±1.18 vs. 14.05±1.69 at 24 hours; non-dependent zone mechanical power (mJ): 7.15±0.84 vs. 7.98±0.75 at 12 hours, 7.77±0.93 vs. 9.13±1.10 at 24 hours], and MEP and MIP in the ECCO<sub>2</sub>R group were significantly higher than those in the conventional treatment group at both 12 hours and 24 hours during the treatment [MEP (cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 1 cmH<sub>2</sub>O ≈ 0.098 kPa): 89.88±5.04 vs. 86.09±5.57 at 12 hours, 96.57±2.59 vs. 88.66±2.98 at 24 hours; MIP (cmH<sub>2</sub>O): 47.64±2.82 vs. 41.93±2.44 at 12 hours, 60.11±6.53 vs. 43.63±2.80 at 24 hours], the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>V-V ECCO<sub>2</sub>R combined with non-invasive ventilation can effectively reduce the regional tidal volume, mechanical power, and respiratory rate in the non-gravitational dependent zones of patients with mild to moderate ARDS, and improve respiratory distress and oxygenation status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue\",\"volume\":\"36 12\",\"pages\":\"1244-1248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240117-00054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240117-00054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨静脉-静脉体外二氧化碳去除术(V-V ECCO2R)对轻中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)无创通气患者局部机械动力和肺内气体分布的影响。方法:采用回顾性研究方法。选取2018年1月至2020年1月在河南省人民医院合作医院通过96195平台重症监护运输绿色通道转入呼吸重症监护室(RICU)的轻中度ARDS合并肾功能不全患者60例。根据治疗方法的不同分为常规治疗组和ECCO2R组,每组30例。两组均接受标准治疗,包括原发性疾病治疗、气道管理和无创通气。常规治疗组给予床边持续肾替代治疗(CRRT), ECCO2R组给予V-V ECCO2R治疗。记录患者的一般信息,如性别、年龄、病因、急性生理和慢性健康评估II (APACHE II);治疗前、治疗12 h、治疗24 h进行动脉血气分析,记录动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)。记录呼吸力学参数[潮气量、呼吸频率、最大吸气压力(MIP)、最大呼气压力(MEP)],计算快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI);采用电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)测量治疗12小时和24小时不同肺区感兴趣区域(ROI)值,计算肺机械能。结果:常规治疗组和ECCO2R组患者治疗24 h后动脉血气分析指标、呼吸力学参数、肺机械能较治疗12 h均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。ECCO2R组在治疗期间12 h和24 h的PaCO2、RSBI、总机械功率、非依赖区机械功率均显著低于常规治疗组[PaCO2 (mmHg, 1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa): 12 h时为44.03±2.96∶49.96±2.50,24 h时为41.65±3.21∶48.53±2.33;RSBI (times×min-1×L-1): 88.67±4.05 vs. 12小时92.35±4.03,77.66±4.64 vs. 24小时90.98±4.21;总机械功率(mJ): 12小时10.40±1.15 vs. 12.93±1.68,24小时11.13±1.18 vs. 14.05±1.69;非依赖性区机械功率(mJ): 12小时7.15±0.84 vs. 7.98±0.75,24小时7.77±0.93 vs. 9.13±1.10],ECCO2R组在12小时和24小时MEP和MIP均显著高于常规治疗组[MEP (cmH2O, 1 cmH2O≈0.098 kPa): 12小时89.88±5.04 vs. 86.09±5.57,24小时96.57±2.59 vs. 88.66±2.98;MIP (cmH2O): 12 h时47.64±2.82 vs 41.93±2.44,24 h时60.11±6.53 vs 43.63±2.80,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:V-V ECCO2R联合无创通气可有效降低轻中度ARDS患者非重力依赖区区域潮气量、机械功率和呼吸频率,改善呼吸窘迫和氧合状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Effect of extra corporeal reducing pre-load on pulmonary mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome].

Objective: To explore the effects of veno-venous extra corporeal carbon dioxide removal (V-V ECCO2R) on local mechanical power and gas distribution in the lungs of patients with mild to moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) receiving non-invasive ventilation.

Methods: Retrospective research methods were conducted. Sixty patients with mild to moderate ARDS complicated with renal insufficiency who were transferred to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) through the 96195 platform critical care transport green channel from January 2018 to January 2020 at the collaborative hospitals of Henan Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into a conventional treatment group and an ECCO2R group, with 30 patients in each group. Both groups received standard treatments including primary disease treatment, airway management, and non-invasive ventilation. The conventional treatment group received bedside continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and the ECCO2R group received V-V ECCO2R treatment. General information of patient such as gender, age, cause of disease, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) were recorded; arterial blood gas analysis was performed before treatment and at 12 hours and 24 hours during treatment, recording arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2). Respiratory mechanics parameters [tidal volume, respiratory rate, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP)] were recorded, and the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) was calculated; electrical impedance tomography (EIT) was used to measure regional of interest (ROI) values in different lung areas at 12 hours and 24 hours of treatment, and the pulmonary mechanical energy was calculated.

Results: The arterial blood gas analysis indicators, respiratory mechanics parameters, and pulmonary mechanical energy of patients in the conventional treatment group and ECCO2R group improved significantly after 24 hours of treatment compared to 12 hours of treatment (all P < 0.05). The levels of PaCO2, RSBI, total mechanical power, and non-dependent zone mechanical power in the ECCO2R group were significantly lower than those in the conventional treatment group at both 12 hours and 24 hours during the treatment [PaCO2 (mmHg, 1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 44.03±2.96 vs. 49.96±2.50 at 12 hours, 41.65±3.21 vs. 48.53±2.33 at 24 hours; RSBI (times×min-1×L-1): 88.67±4.05 vs. 92.35±4.03 at 12 hours, 77.66±4.64 vs. 90.98±4.21 at 24 hours; total mechanical power (mJ): 10.40±1.15 vs. 12.93±1.68 at 12 hours, 11.13±1.18 vs. 14.05±1.69 at 24 hours; non-dependent zone mechanical power (mJ): 7.15±0.84 vs. 7.98±0.75 at 12 hours, 7.77±0.93 vs. 9.13±1.10 at 24 hours], and MEP and MIP in the ECCO2R group were significantly higher than those in the conventional treatment group at both 12 hours and 24 hours during the treatment [MEP (cmH2O, 1 cmH2O ≈ 0.098 kPa): 89.88±5.04 vs. 86.09±5.57 at 12 hours, 96.57±2.59 vs. 88.66±2.98 at 24 hours; MIP (cmH2O): 47.64±2.82 vs. 41.93±2.44 at 12 hours, 60.11±6.53 vs. 43.63±2.80 at 24 hours], the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: V-V ECCO2R combined with non-invasive ventilation can effectively reduce the regional tidal volume, mechanical power, and respiratory rate in the non-gravitational dependent zones of patients with mild to moderate ARDS, and improve respiratory distress and oxygenation status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
[Construction of prognostic prediction model for patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury treated with continuous renal replacement therapy]. [Effect of extra corporeal reducing pre-load on pulmonary mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome]. [Efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of adult patients with acute severe asthma: a Meta-analysis]. [Efficiency analysis of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after brain injury: a multicenter retrospective cohort study]. [Establishment of risk prediction model for pneumonia infection in elderly severe patients and analysis of prevention effect of 1M3S nursing plan under early warning mode].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1