“停滞或不稳定”:全科医生与复杂慢性病患者之间的伙伴关系。定性研究。

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0146
Mads Aage Toft Kristensen, Mette Bech Risør, Andreas Søndergaard Heltberg, Tora Grauers Willadsen, Ann Dorrit Guassora
{"title":"“停滞或不稳定”:全科医生与复杂慢性病患者之间的伙伴关系。定性研究。","authors":"Mads Aage Toft Kristensen, Mette Bech Risør, Andreas Søndergaard Heltberg, Tora Grauers Willadsen, Ann Dorrit Guassora","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In chronic care, patient-GP collaboration is essential, but might be challenging if patients have complex health problems due to multimorbidity, psychosocial predicaments and addiction problems. To understand and manage these challenges, it is important to explore how patients' and GPs' attempt to collaborate, to maintain and achieve an alliance in order to gain good quality of care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how dyads of GPs and patients that GPs deem have complex health problems and difficulties following treatment perceive and manage challenges in their chronic care partnership.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A qualitative study from Danish general practice in deprived, rural areas.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with 12 dyads of GPs and patients with doctor-assessed complex chronic conditions and difficulties following treatment. The principles of Systematic Text Condensation were used in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the patient-GP collaboration could be characterized as either stuck or unstable. In both types, the challenges were identified as pointless consultations, conflicts about lifestyle, resignation, concealment of information, and hopelessness. These challenges could be managed by solving conflicts, adjusting to the patient's needs, accommodating the challenges in the relationship, and offering continued emotional support even with unsolved medical problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Care of patients with complex health problems may possess several challenges. In this study, patients and GPs experienced the relational dimension as crucial for collaboration. A robust therapeutic alliance, incorporating the patient's agenda, offers an essential foundation for enhancing care in individuals with complex health problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Stuck or unstable': partnerships between GPs and patients with complex chronic conditions. A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Mads Aage Toft Kristensen, Mette Bech Risør, Andreas Søndergaard Heltberg, Tora Grauers Willadsen, Ann Dorrit Guassora\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In chronic care, patient-GP collaboration is essential, but might be challenging if patients have complex health problems due to multimorbidity, psychosocial predicaments and addiction problems. To understand and manage these challenges, it is important to explore how patients' and GPs' attempt to collaborate, to maintain and achieve an alliance in order to gain good quality of care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how dyads of GPs and patients that GPs deem have complex health problems and difficulties following treatment perceive and manage challenges in their chronic care partnership.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A qualitative study from Danish general practice in deprived, rural areas.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with 12 dyads of GPs and patients with doctor-assessed complex chronic conditions and difficulties following treatment. The principles of Systematic Text Condensation were used in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the patient-GP collaboration could be characterized as either stuck or unstable. In both types, the challenges were identified as pointless consultations, conflicts about lifestyle, resignation, concealment of information, and hopelessness. These challenges could be managed by solving conflicts, adjusting to the patient's needs, accommodating the challenges in the relationship, and offering continued emotional support even with unsolved medical problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Care of patients with complex health problems may possess several challenges. In this study, patients and GPs experienced the relational dimension as crucial for collaboration. A robust therapeutic alliance, incorporating the patient's agenda, offers an essential foundation for enhancing care in individuals with complex health problems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在慢性护理中,患者与全科医生的合作是必不可少的,但如果患者由于多种疾病、社会心理困境和成瘾问题而有复杂的健康问题,则可能具有挑战性。为了理解和应对这些挑战,重要的是要探索患者和全科医生如何尝试合作,维持和实现联盟,以获得高质量的护理。目的:探讨全科医生和全科医生认为有复杂健康问题和治疗后困难的患者如何感知和管理他们的慢性护理伙伴关系中的挑战。设计与设置:对丹麦贫困农村地区的全科实践进行定性研究。方法:对12对全科医生和经医生评估有复杂慢性疾病和治疗困难的患者进行半结构化访谈。在分析中运用了系统文本凝聚的原理。结果:总体而言,患者与全科医生的合作表现为粘滞或不稳定。在这两种类型中,挑战被确定为无意义的咨询,生活方式的冲突,辞职,隐瞒信息和绝望。这些挑战可以通过解决冲突,适应病人的需求,适应关系中的挑战,甚至在未解决的医疗问题上提供持续的情感支持来管理。结论:复杂健康问题患者的护理可能面临一些挑战。在本研究中,患者和全科医生都认为关系维度对合作至关重要。一个强有力的治疗联盟,纳入患者的议程,为加强对具有复杂健康问题的个人的护理提供了重要的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Stuck or unstable': partnerships between GPs and patients with complex chronic conditions. A qualitative study.

Background: In chronic care, patient-GP collaboration is essential, but might be challenging if patients have complex health problems due to multimorbidity, psychosocial predicaments and addiction problems. To understand and manage these challenges, it is important to explore how patients' and GPs' attempt to collaborate, to maintain and achieve an alliance in order to gain good quality of care.

Aim: To explore how dyads of GPs and patients that GPs deem have complex health problems and difficulties following treatment perceive and manage challenges in their chronic care partnership.

Design & setting: A qualitative study from Danish general practice in deprived, rural areas.

Method: Semi-structured interviews with 12 dyads of GPs and patients with doctor-assessed complex chronic conditions and difficulties following treatment. The principles of Systematic Text Condensation were used in the analysis.

Results: Overall, the patient-GP collaboration could be characterized as either stuck or unstable. In both types, the challenges were identified as pointless consultations, conflicts about lifestyle, resignation, concealment of information, and hopelessness. These challenges could be managed by solving conflicts, adjusting to the patient's needs, accommodating the challenges in the relationship, and offering continued emotional support even with unsolved medical problems.

Conclusion: Care of patients with complex health problems may possess several challenges. In this study, patients and GPs experienced the relational dimension as crucial for collaboration. A robust therapeutic alliance, incorporating the patient's agenda, offers an essential foundation for enhancing care in individuals with complex health problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
The association between coding for chronic kidney disease and kidney replacement therapy incidence at CCG-level in England: an ecological study. Lifestyle interventions for depression in primary care: a qualitative study. Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey. Adjusting primary-care funding by deprivation: a cross-sectional study of Lower layer Super Output Areas in England. Identifying impaired mental health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1