Thim Prætorius, Eskild Klausen Fredslund, Daniel Cæsar Torp, Annelli Sandbaek
{"title":"视频咨询使用与全科医生和实践特点之间的关系:丹麦的一项横断面调查。","authors":"Thim Prætorius, Eskild Klausen Fredslund, Daniel Cæsar Torp, Annelli Sandbaek","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Video consultations (VC) disrupt how general practice provides care and how patients receive it. A step towards understanding the use of VC is to study the association between user-status and general practitioner and practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the association between general practitioner and general practice characteristics and VC user-status (users, never users, and former users).</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>An anonymous, web-based, cross-sectional survey was distributed to all 1674 Danish general practices (singlehanded, collaborative, and partnership forms) contracting with and working on a collective agreement with the public funder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Multinomial logistic regression was used to correlate VC user-status and (1) general practice characteristics, and general practitioners' (2a) objective characteristics and (2b) subjective attitudes towards VC and organizational change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample included 416 general practitioners. Users of VC compared to never-users: partnership practices (RRR=0.22; 95% CI 0.06-0.85) and practices with six or more practice staff (RRR=0.05; 95% CI 0.01-0.28) were significantly more likely to be users. The same was found for general practitioners with a high degree of tech savviness (RRR=0.02; 95% CI 0.001-0.17) and openness to organisational change (RRR=0.26; 95% CI 0.08-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Characteristics of general practice and general practitioners are associated with VC user-status (being a user, never user or former user). Future research should use a Difference-in-Difference study design and register data to make causality claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between video consultation use and general practitioner and practice characteristics: a cross-sectional survey in Denmark.\",\"authors\":\"Thim Prætorius, Eskild Klausen Fredslund, Daniel Cæsar Torp, Annelli Sandbaek\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Video consultations (VC) disrupt how general practice provides care and how patients receive it. A step towards understanding the use of VC is to study the association between user-status and general practitioner and practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the association between general practitioner and general practice characteristics and VC user-status (users, never users, and former users).</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>An anonymous, web-based, cross-sectional survey was distributed to all 1674 Danish general practices (singlehanded, collaborative, and partnership forms) contracting with and working on a collective agreement with the public funder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Multinomial logistic regression was used to correlate VC user-status and (1) general practice characteristics, and general practitioners' (2a) objective characteristics and (2b) subjective attitudes towards VC and organizational change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample included 416 general practitioners. Users of VC compared to never-users: partnership practices (RRR=0.22; 95% CI 0.06-0.85) and practices with six or more practice staff (RRR=0.05; 95% CI 0.01-0.28) were significantly more likely to be users. The same was found for general practitioners with a high degree of tech savviness (RRR=0.02; 95% CI 0.001-0.17) and openness to organisational change (RRR=0.26; 95% CI 0.08-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Characteristics of general practice and general practitioners are associated with VC user-status (being a user, never user or former user). Future research should use a Difference-in-Difference study design and register data to make causality claims.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:视频会诊(VC)扰乱了全科医生提供护理和患者接受护理的方式。了解VC使用的一个步骤是研究用户状态与全科医生和实践特征之间的关联。目的:研究全科医生和全科医生特征与VC用户状态(用户、非用户和前用户)之间的关系。设计与设置:一项匿名的、基于网络的横断面调查被分发给所有1674家丹麦全科诊所(单独的、合作的和合作的形式),这些诊所与公共资助者签订了集体协议。方法:采用多项逻辑回归分析VC用户状态与(1)全科医生特征、全科医生(2a)客观特征和(2b)主观态度对VC和组织变革的关系。结果:研究样本包括416名全科医生。VC使用者与从不使用者的比较:合伙人实践(RRR=0.22;95% CI 0.06-0.85)和6名或更多执业人员的执业(RRR=0.05;95% CI 0.01-0.28)更有可能是使用者。对技术熟悉程度高的全科医生也有同样的结果(rr =0.02;95% CI 0.001-0.17)和对组织变革的开放程度(RRR=0.26;95% ci 0.08-0.85)。结论:全科医生和全科医生的特征与VC用户状态(是用户、非用户或以前的用户)有关。未来的研究应采用差异中差异研究设计和登记数据来提出因果关系主张。
Association between video consultation use and general practitioner and practice characteristics: a cross-sectional survey in Denmark.
Background: Video consultations (VC) disrupt how general practice provides care and how patients receive it. A step towards understanding the use of VC is to study the association between user-status and general practitioner and practice characteristics.
Aim: To study the association between general practitioner and general practice characteristics and VC user-status (users, never users, and former users).
Design & setting: An anonymous, web-based, cross-sectional survey was distributed to all 1674 Danish general practices (singlehanded, collaborative, and partnership forms) contracting with and working on a collective agreement with the public funder.
Method: Multinomial logistic regression was used to correlate VC user-status and (1) general practice characteristics, and general practitioners' (2a) objective characteristics and (2b) subjective attitudes towards VC and organizational change.
Results: The study sample included 416 general practitioners. Users of VC compared to never-users: partnership practices (RRR=0.22; 95% CI 0.06-0.85) and practices with six or more practice staff (RRR=0.05; 95% CI 0.01-0.28) were significantly more likely to be users. The same was found for general practitioners with a high degree of tech savviness (RRR=0.02; 95% CI 0.001-0.17) and openness to organisational change (RRR=0.26; 95% CI 0.08-0.85).
Conclusion: Characteristics of general practice and general practitioners are associated with VC user-status (being a user, never user or former user). Future research should use a Difference-in-Difference study design and register data to make causality claims.