CT伪影定量评估中与噪声相关的不准确性。

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s12194-024-00869-9
Kazutaka Hoyoshi, Kazuhiro Sato, Noriyasu Homma, Issei Mori
{"title":"CT伪影定量评估中与噪声相关的不准确性。","authors":"Kazutaka Hoyoshi, Kazuhiro Sato, Noriyasu Homma, Issei Mori","doi":"10.1007/s12194-024-00869-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accuracies of measuring the artifact index (AI), a quantitative artifact evaluation index in X-ray CT images, were investigated. The AI is calculated based not only on the standard deviation (SD) of the artifact area in the image, but also on the SD of noise components for considering the noise influence. However, conventional measurement methods may not follow this consideration, for example the non-uniformity of the noise distribution is not taken into account, resulting in reducing the accuracy of AI. To address this problem, this study aims to clarify the impact of noise SD measuring (NSDM) error on AI accuracy and improve the accuracy by reducing the NSDM error. Experimental results demonstrated that the conventional noise measurement methods reduced the accuracy of the AI. Specifically, AI inaccuracy due to the NSDM error is severe in the case of weak artifacts and under high noise conditions. Furthermore, the AI accuracy can be improved by reducing the influence of the NSDM error through image smoothing or by correcting NSDM through noise distribution estimation. These results showed that AI can be affected by NSDM errors practically even though it is robust against noise in principle. The impact of NSDM errors must be avoided for reliable artifact evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noise-related inaccuracies in the quantitative evaluation of CT artifacts.\",\"authors\":\"Kazutaka Hoyoshi, Kazuhiro Sato, Noriyasu Homma, Issei Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12194-024-00869-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accuracies of measuring the artifact index (AI), a quantitative artifact evaluation index in X-ray CT images, were investigated. The AI is calculated based not only on the standard deviation (SD) of the artifact area in the image, but also on the SD of noise components for considering the noise influence. However, conventional measurement methods may not follow this consideration, for example the non-uniformity of the noise distribution is not taken into account, resulting in reducing the accuracy of AI. To address this problem, this study aims to clarify the impact of noise SD measuring (NSDM) error on AI accuracy and improve the accuracy by reducing the NSDM error. Experimental results demonstrated that the conventional noise measurement methods reduced the accuracy of the AI. Specifically, AI inaccuracy due to the NSDM error is severe in the case of weak artifacts and under high noise conditions. Furthermore, the AI accuracy can be improved by reducing the influence of the NSDM error through image smoothing or by correcting NSDM through noise distribution estimation. These results showed that AI can be affected by NSDM errors practically even though it is robust against noise in principle. The impact of NSDM errors must be avoided for reliable artifact evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00869-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00869-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了x射线CT图像中定量伪影评价指标——伪影指数(artificial index, AI)的测量精度。人工智能的计算不仅基于图像中伪影区域的标准差(SD),还基于考虑噪声影响的噪声分量的SD。然而,传统的测量方法可能没有考虑到这一点,例如没有考虑到噪声分布的不均匀性,从而降低了AI的精度。为了解决这一问题,本研究旨在阐明噪声SD测量(NSDM)误差对人工智能精度的影响,并通过减小NSDM误差来提高人工智能精度。实验结果表明,传统的噪声测量方法降低了人工智能的精度。具体来说,在弱伪像和高噪声条件下,由NSDM误差引起的人工智能不准确性是严重的。此外,可以通过平滑图像来降低NSDM误差的影响,或者通过噪声分布估计来校正NSDM,从而提高人工智能的精度。这些结果表明,尽管人工智能在原理上对噪声具有鲁棒性,但实际上它可能受到NSDM误差的影响。为了可靠的工件评估,必须避免NSDM错误的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Noise-related inaccuracies in the quantitative evaluation of CT artifacts.

Accuracies of measuring the artifact index (AI), a quantitative artifact evaluation index in X-ray CT images, were investigated. The AI is calculated based not only on the standard deviation (SD) of the artifact area in the image, but also on the SD of noise components for considering the noise influence. However, conventional measurement methods may not follow this consideration, for example the non-uniformity of the noise distribution is not taken into account, resulting in reducing the accuracy of AI. To address this problem, this study aims to clarify the impact of noise SD measuring (NSDM) error on AI accuracy and improve the accuracy by reducing the NSDM error. Experimental results demonstrated that the conventional noise measurement methods reduced the accuracy of the AI. Specifically, AI inaccuracy due to the NSDM error is severe in the case of weak artifacts and under high noise conditions. Furthermore, the AI accuracy can be improved by reducing the influence of the NSDM error through image smoothing or by correcting NSDM through noise distribution estimation. These results showed that AI can be affected by NSDM errors practically even though it is robust against noise in principle. The impact of NSDM errors must be avoided for reliable artifact evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
期刊最新文献
Selection of Radiological Physics and Technology Awards 2024. Age-related sensitivity deterioration evaluation of positron emission tomography utilizing cross-calibration factor measurement data. Peripheral dose assessment in radiation therapy using photon beams: experimental results with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter. Influence of obtaining medical records and laboratory data on the sensitivity of diagnostic imaging assessment by radiological technologists. Dosimetric impact of arc simulation angular resolution in single-isocentre multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1