长效局麻药与短时局麻药混合用于超声引导下周围神经阻滞的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-106104
Natanael Pietroski Dos Santos, Vanessa de Paula Silva, Guilherme Stéfano da Silva Oliveira, Victor Cardoso Musacchio, Vanessa Henriques Carvalho
{"title":"长效局麻药与短时局麻药混合用于超声引导下周围神经阻滞的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Natanael Pietroski Dos Santos, Vanessa de Paula Silva, Guilherme Stéfano da Silva Oliveira, Victor Cardoso Musacchio, Vanessa Henriques Carvalho","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/importance: </strong>Local anesthetic (LA) mixtures are used in peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) to improve onset, though study results remain conflicting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy outcomes of long-acting LA to their mixture with shorter-acting LA in ultrasound-guided PNB. The primary outcome was sensory block onset.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>We searched WoS, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BVS/LILACS, and Cochrane databases from 1998 to 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis, evaluated the risk of bias (RoB) with RoB 2.0, performed sensitivity analyses, assessed non-reporting bias with DOI plots and Luis Furuya-Kanamori index, and evaluated strength of evidence with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included 10 RCTs (516 participants). Mixture of LA may have no effect on sensory block onset (mean difference (MD) -1.62 min, 95% CI: -4.04 to 0.81; I<sup>2</sup>=81.50%, 95% CI: 62.82% to 90.80%; prediction interval (PI)=-7.78 to 4.55; very low certainty) and motor block onset (MD -5.60 min; 95% CI: -14.54 to 3.33, I<sup>2</sup>=98.89%, 95% CI: 98.50% to 99.18%; PI=-31.90 to 20.69; very low certainty), while it may reduce the duration of sensory block (MD -2.16 hours, 95% CI: -4.16 to -0.17; I<sup>2</sup>=90.77%, 95% CI: 84.22% to 94.60%; PI=-7.24 to 2.92; very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA mixtures may not affect sensory and motor block onset in ultrasound-guided PNB but could shorten the duration of sensory blockade.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of long-acting local anesthetics versus their mixture with shorter-acting local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks guided by ultrasound: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Natanael Pietroski Dos Santos, Vanessa de Paula Silva, Guilherme Stéfano da Silva Oliveira, Victor Cardoso Musacchio, Vanessa Henriques Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-106104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/importance: </strong>Local anesthetic (LA) mixtures are used in peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) to improve onset, though study results remain conflicting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy outcomes of long-acting LA to their mixture with shorter-acting LA in ultrasound-guided PNB. The primary outcome was sensory block onset.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>We searched WoS, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BVS/LILACS, and Cochrane databases from 1998 to 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis, evaluated the risk of bias (RoB) with RoB 2.0, performed sensitivity analyses, assessed non-reporting bias with DOI plots and Luis Furuya-Kanamori index, and evaluated strength of evidence with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included 10 RCTs (516 participants). Mixture of LA may have no effect on sensory block onset (mean difference (MD) -1.62 min, 95% CI: -4.04 to 0.81; I<sup>2</sup>=81.50%, 95% CI: 62.82% to 90.80%; prediction interval (PI)=-7.78 to 4.55; very low certainty) and motor block onset (MD -5.60 min; 95% CI: -14.54 to 3.33, I<sup>2</sup>=98.89%, 95% CI: 98.50% to 99.18%; PI=-31.90 to 20.69; very low certainty), while it may reduce the duration of sensory block (MD -2.16 hours, 95% CI: -4.16 to -0.17; I<sup>2</sup>=90.77%, 95% CI: 84.22% to 94.60%; PI=-7.24 to 2.92; very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA mixtures may not affect sensory and motor block onset in ultrasound-guided PNB but could shorten the duration of sensory blockade.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106104\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/重要性:局部麻醉剂(LA)混合物用于周围神经阻滞(PNB)以改善发作,尽管研究结果仍然存在冲突。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了超声引导下PNB中长效LA与联用短效LA的疗效结果。主要结局是感觉阻滞发作。证据回顾:我们检索了1998 - 2024年WoS、Scopus、MEDLINE、EMBASE、BVS/LILACS和Cochrane数据库中的随机对照试验(RCTs)。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,使用RoB 2.0评估偏倚风险(RoB),进行敏感性分析,使用DOI图和Luis Furuya-Kanamori指数评估非报告偏倚,并使用分级推荐评估、发展和评估评估证据强度。结果:我们纳入了10项随机对照试验(516名受试者)。混合LA可能对感觉阻滞发作没有影响(平均差(MD) -1.62分钟,95% CI: -4.04至0.81;I2=81.50%, 95% CI: 62.82% ~ 90.80%;预测区间(PI)=-7.78 ~ 4.55;非常低的确定性)和运动阻滞发作(MD -5.60分钟;95%置信区间:-14.54 - 3.33,I2 = 98.89%, 95%置信区间CI: 98.50% - 99.18%;PI=-31.90 ~ 20.69;非常低的确定性),但它可能缩短感觉阻滞的持续时间(MD: -2.16小时,95% CI: -4.16至-0.17;I2=90.77%, 95% CI: 84.22% ~ 94.60%;PI=-7.24至2.92;非常低的确定性)。结论:LA混合物可能不会影响超声引导下PNB的感觉和运动阻滞发作,但可以缩短感觉阻滞的持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of long-acting local anesthetics versus their mixture with shorter-acting local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks guided by ultrasound: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background/importance: Local anesthetic (LA) mixtures are used in peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) to improve onset, though study results remain conflicting.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy outcomes of long-acting LA to their mixture with shorter-acting LA in ultrasound-guided PNB. The primary outcome was sensory block onset.

Evidence review: We searched WoS, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BVS/LILACS, and Cochrane databases from 1998 to 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis, evaluated the risk of bias (RoB) with RoB 2.0, performed sensitivity analyses, assessed non-reporting bias with DOI plots and Luis Furuya-Kanamori index, and evaluated strength of evidence with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

Findings: We included 10 RCTs (516 participants). Mixture of LA may have no effect on sensory block onset (mean difference (MD) -1.62 min, 95% CI: -4.04 to 0.81; I2=81.50%, 95% CI: 62.82% to 90.80%; prediction interval (PI)=-7.78 to 4.55; very low certainty) and motor block onset (MD -5.60 min; 95% CI: -14.54 to 3.33, I2=98.89%, 95% CI: 98.50% to 99.18%; PI=-31.90 to 20.69; very low certainty), while it may reduce the duration of sensory block (MD -2.16 hours, 95% CI: -4.16 to -0.17; I2=90.77%, 95% CI: 84.22% to 94.60%; PI=-7.24 to 2.92; very low certainty).

Conclusions: LA mixtures may not affect sensory and motor block onset in ultrasound-guided PNB but could shorten the duration of sensory blockade.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Cadaveric study of the obturator nerve: frequency of skin innervation and the optimal site for blocking the cutaneous branch. Effect of stellate ganglion block on brain hemodynamics and the inflammatory response in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Letter to the editor: Is medetomidine the next perioperative substance of abuse? Perineuromal hydrodissection for acute postamputation pain? An observational study in a time of war. FRONT block: a cadaveric study of a dual-plane injection block targeting femoral rami and obturator nerve trunk for anterior hip joint analgesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1