骨质疏松对种植体骨整合和存活率的影响:临床研究的系统回顾。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Quintessence international Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b5927487
Jamil A Shibli, Viviane Naddeo, Khalila C Cotrim, Eduardo C Kalil, Erica Dorigatti de Avila, Fernanda Faot, Leonardo P Faverani, João Gabriel G Souza, Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes
{"title":"骨质疏松对种植体骨整合和存活率的影响:临床研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Jamil A Shibli, Viviane Naddeo, Khalila C Cotrim, Eduardo C Kalil, Erica Dorigatti de Avila, Fernanda Faot, Leonardo P Faverani, João Gabriel G Souza, Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5927487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of this systematic review was to critically appraise the existing evidence evaluating osteoporosis' effects on dental implant osseointegration and survival rate.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>A search was conducted in two databases, PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, until October 2024, using the keywords 'osteoporosis,' 'osteopenia,' 'osseointegration,' and 'dental implants'. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that evaluated the implant placement, complications, and osseointegration results in patients with osteoporosis; literature reviews and clinical studies addressing the outcome were considered; and articles written in English and published since 2000. Descriptive data analysis included author, year of publication, study design, number of patients, osteoporosis assessment, follow-up, and main findings. JBI quality assessment was performed. 24 articles were included with a total of 2,102 patients; 5954 dental implants were considered and evaluated. Most studies evaluated bone density for osteoporosis by dual-energy x-ray technology. The follow-up ranged from 1 month to 25 years. Four studies evaluated implants with over 10 years of follow-up. All studies' survival rate was higher than 90%, even for osteoporotic patients. Most studies indicated no differences between osteoporotic and healthy patients regarding marginal bone loss (MBL), bone-to-implant contact, cytokine levels, and mineral bone density. A prospective cohort study found a small MBL (-0.34 mm) in osteoporotic female patients, but there was insufficient evidence to prove any causal relationship between MBL and osteoporosis. Another study showed no clinical differences between implants placed in osteoporotic and healthy individuals. In contrast, other studies showed lower stability scores for implants placed in osteoporotic sites and a higher risk of failure for implant placement. Osteoporosis status was not a risk factor for dental implant failure, which was also confirmed by histological studies. Three studies had a medium risk of bias and 21 a low risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osteoporosis is not a contraindication for dental implant placement. Osseointegration in patients with osteoporosis is feasible; however, planning must be cautious and personalized for the installation of dental implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteoporosis' effects on dental implants osseointegration and survival rate: a systematic review of clinical studies.\",\"authors\":\"Jamil A Shibli, Viviane Naddeo, Khalila C Cotrim, Eduardo C Kalil, Erica Dorigatti de Avila, Fernanda Faot, Leonardo P Faverani, João Gabriel G Souza, Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b5927487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of this systematic review was to critically appraise the existing evidence evaluating osteoporosis' effects on dental implant osseointegration and survival rate.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>A search was conducted in two databases, PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, until October 2024, using the keywords 'osteoporosis,' 'osteopenia,' 'osseointegration,' and 'dental implants'. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that evaluated the implant placement, complications, and osseointegration results in patients with osteoporosis; literature reviews and clinical studies addressing the outcome were considered; and articles written in English and published since 2000. Descriptive data analysis included author, year of publication, study design, number of patients, osteoporosis assessment, follow-up, and main findings. JBI quality assessment was performed. 24 articles were included with a total of 2,102 patients; 5954 dental implants were considered and evaluated. Most studies evaluated bone density for osteoporosis by dual-energy x-ray technology. The follow-up ranged from 1 month to 25 years. Four studies evaluated implants with over 10 years of follow-up. All studies' survival rate was higher than 90%, even for osteoporotic patients. Most studies indicated no differences between osteoporotic and healthy patients regarding marginal bone loss (MBL), bone-to-implant contact, cytokine levels, and mineral bone density. A prospective cohort study found a small MBL (-0.34 mm) in osteoporotic female patients, but there was insufficient evidence to prove any causal relationship between MBL and osteoporosis. Another study showed no clinical differences between implants placed in osteoporotic and healthy individuals. In contrast, other studies showed lower stability scores for implants placed in osteoporotic sites and a higher risk of failure for implant placement. Osteoporosis status was not a risk factor for dental implant failure, which was also confirmed by histological studies. Three studies had a medium risk of bias and 21 a low risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osteoporosis is not a contraindication for dental implant placement. Osseointegration in patients with osteoporosis is feasible; however, planning must be cautious and personalized for the installation of dental implants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5927487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5927487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述的目的是批判性地评估骨质疏松对种植体骨整合和存活率影响的现有证据。数据来源:在PubMed/MEDLINE和Scopus两个数据库中进行了检索,直到2024年10月,使用关键词“骨质疏松症”,“骨质减少”,“骨整合”和“牙科种植体”。纳入标准是评估骨质疏松患者种植体放置、并发症和骨整合结果的临床研究;考虑了文献综述和针对结果的临床研究;以及2000年以来发表的英文文章。描述性资料分析包括作者、发表年份、研究设计、患者数量、骨质疏松评估、随访和主要发现。进行JBI质量评价。纳入24篇文献,共2102例患者;考虑并评估了5954颗种植体。大多数研究通过双能x线技术评估骨质疏松症的骨密度。随访时间为1个月至25年。四项研究对种植体进行了超过10年的随访。所有研究的存活率都高于90%,即使是骨质疏松症患者。大多数研究表明,骨质疏松症患者和健康患者在边缘骨质流失(MBL)、骨与种植体接触、细胞因子水平和矿物质骨密度方面没有差异。一项前瞻性队列研究发现骨质疏松症女性患者MBL较小(-0.34 mm),但没有足够的证据证明MBL与骨质疏松症之间存在因果关系。另一项研究显示,在骨质疏松症患者和健康人身上植入植入物没有临床差异。相比之下,其他研究显示植入骨质疏松部位的植入物稳定性评分较低,植入失败的风险较高。骨质疏松不是种植体失败的危险因素,组织学研究也证实了这一点。3项研究有中等偏倚风险,21项为低风险。结论:骨质疏松不是种植牙的禁忌症。骨质疏松患者骨整合是可行的;然而,计划必须谨慎和个性化的安装牙种植体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Osteoporosis' effects on dental implants osseointegration and survival rate: a systematic review of clinical studies.

Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to critically appraise the existing evidence evaluating osteoporosis' effects on dental implant osseointegration and survival rate.

Data source: A search was conducted in two databases, PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, until October 2024, using the keywords 'osteoporosis,' 'osteopenia,' 'osseointegration,' and 'dental implants'. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that evaluated the implant placement, complications, and osseointegration results in patients with osteoporosis; literature reviews and clinical studies addressing the outcome were considered; and articles written in English and published since 2000. Descriptive data analysis included author, year of publication, study design, number of patients, osteoporosis assessment, follow-up, and main findings. JBI quality assessment was performed. 24 articles were included with a total of 2,102 patients; 5954 dental implants were considered and evaluated. Most studies evaluated bone density for osteoporosis by dual-energy x-ray technology. The follow-up ranged from 1 month to 25 years. Four studies evaluated implants with over 10 years of follow-up. All studies' survival rate was higher than 90%, even for osteoporotic patients. Most studies indicated no differences between osteoporotic and healthy patients regarding marginal bone loss (MBL), bone-to-implant contact, cytokine levels, and mineral bone density. A prospective cohort study found a small MBL (-0.34 mm) in osteoporotic female patients, but there was insufficient evidence to prove any causal relationship between MBL and osteoporosis. Another study showed no clinical differences between implants placed in osteoporotic and healthy individuals. In contrast, other studies showed lower stability scores for implants placed in osteoporotic sites and a higher risk of failure for implant placement. Osteoporosis status was not a risk factor for dental implant failure, which was also confirmed by histological studies. Three studies had a medium risk of bias and 21 a low risk.

Conclusion: Osteoporosis is not a contraindication for dental implant placement. Osseointegration in patients with osteoporosis is feasible; however, planning must be cautious and personalized for the installation of dental implants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and comparison of temporomandibular disorders according to axis I in RDC/TMD and DC/TMD: a cross-sectional study. Long-term changes in gingival recessions and their impact on oral health-related quality of life in patients under supportive periodontal therapy: a bidirectional cohort study. Osteoporosis' effects on dental implants osseointegration and survival rate: a systematic review of clinical studies. Antioxidant, antibacterial, and systemic efficacy of sesame oil-pulling in periodontitis and diabetes management. Optimizing axial inclination with clear aligner orthodontic treatment to address recession defects: a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1