高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素与重组促卵泡激素在卵巢储备不良患者行胞浆内单精子注射中的比较。

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.48095/cccg2024469
Dilay Gok Korucu, Humeyra Akgun, Mahmut Sami Tutar, Sukran Doğru, Oguzhan Gunenc
{"title":"高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素与重组促卵泡激素在卵巢储备不良患者行胞浆内单精子注射中的比较。","authors":"Dilay Gok Korucu, Humeyra Akgun, Mahmut Sami Tutar, Sukran Doğru, Oguzhan Gunenc","doi":"10.48095/cccg2024469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to compare highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hp-hMG) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in short antagonist in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles of patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR). Limited research exists on this comparison in short antagonist cycles for this patient group.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study involved 165 POR patients aged 18-45 years who underwent IVF between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on their GnRH antagonist protocol: hp-hMG (group 1 = 72) and rFSH (group 2 = 93). We compared pregnancy outcomes, number of oocytes collected, mature oocytes retrieved, mean fertilized oocytes, top quality embryos transferred, and serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) levels on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: No significant differences were found in E2 and P levels on hCG trigger day, endometrial thickness on transfer day, stimulation duration, total oocyte number, and mature oocyte number (P > 0.05). The total gonadotropin dose was significantly higher in the rFSH group (P < 0.001). The number of top-quality embryos transferred and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates did not diff er significantly between groups (P = 0.320; P = 0.310; P = 0.652; and P = 0.662, resp.).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither hp-hMG nor rFSH showed superiority in patients with POR, indicating similar effectiveness in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"89 6","pages":"469-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone in poor ovarian reserve patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.\",\"authors\":\"Dilay Gok Korucu, Humeyra Akgun, Mahmut Sami Tutar, Sukran Doğru, Oguzhan Gunenc\",\"doi\":\"10.48095/cccg2024469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to compare highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hp-hMG) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in short antagonist in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles of patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR). Limited research exists on this comparison in short antagonist cycles for this patient group.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study involved 165 POR patients aged 18-45 years who underwent IVF between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on their GnRH antagonist protocol: hp-hMG (group 1 = 72) and rFSH (group 2 = 93). We compared pregnancy outcomes, number of oocytes collected, mature oocytes retrieved, mean fertilized oocytes, top quality embryos transferred, and serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) levels on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: No significant differences were found in E2 and P levels on hCG trigger day, endometrial thickness on transfer day, stimulation duration, total oocyte number, and mature oocyte number (P > 0.05). The total gonadotropin dose was significantly higher in the rFSH group (P < 0.001). The number of top-quality embryos transferred and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates did not diff er significantly between groups (P = 0.320; P = 0.310; P = 0.652; and P = 0.662, resp.).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither hp-hMG nor rFSH showed superiority in patients with POR, indicating similar effectiveness in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"89 6\",\"pages\":\"469-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2024469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2024469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素(hp-hMG)和重组促卵泡激素(rFSH)在卵巢储备不良(POR)患者体外受精(IVF)短周期拮抗中的作用。针对该患者组的短拮抗剂周期的比较研究有限。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了165例18-45岁的POR患者,他们在2018年至2022年期间接受了体外受精。根据GnRH拮抗剂方案将患者分为两组:hp-hMG(组1 = 72)和rFSH(组2 = 93)。我们比较了人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)给药当天的妊娠结局、收集的卵母细胞数量、回收的成熟卵母细胞、平均受精卵母细胞数量、移植的高质量胚胎以及血清雌二醇(E2)和孕酮(P)水平。结果:E2、P水平在hCG触发日、移植日子宫内膜厚度、刺激持续时间、总卵母细胞数、成熟卵母细胞数差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。rFSH组促性腺激素总剂量显著高于对照组(P < 0.001)。两组间优质胚胎移植数、临床妊娠率和活产率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.320;P = 0.310;P = 0.652;P = 0.662, P < 0.05)。结论:hp-hMG和rFSH在POR患者中均未显示出优势,表明该人群的疗效相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone in poor ovarian reserve patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Objective: We aimed to compare highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hp-hMG) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in short antagonist in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles of patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR). Limited research exists on this comparison in short antagonist cycles for this patient group.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 165 POR patients aged 18-45 years who underwent IVF between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on their GnRH antagonist protocol: hp-hMG (group 1 = 72) and rFSH (group 2 = 93). We compared pregnancy outcomes, number of oocytes collected, mature oocytes retrieved, mean fertilized oocytes, top quality embryos transferred, and serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) levels on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration day.

Results: : No significant differences were found in E2 and P levels on hCG trigger day, endometrial thickness on transfer day, stimulation duration, total oocyte number, and mature oocyte number (P > 0.05). The total gonadotropin dose was significantly higher in the rFSH group (P < 0.001). The number of top-quality embryos transferred and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates did not diff er significantly between groups (P = 0.320; P = 0.310; P = 0.652; and P = 0.662, resp.).

Conclusion: Neither hp-hMG nor rFSH showed superiority in patients with POR, indicating similar effectiveness in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Birth plan - legal and medical aspects. Discrepancies in staging and perioperative classification of pelvic endometriosis according to #Enzian 2021. Female orgasm, reproduction and couple relationships. Importance of vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - retrospective study. New recommendations for informing patients and gamete donors in assisted reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1