名字的含义是什么?有无脑震荡史的大学生运动员的抑郁和焦虑症状

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1123/jsr.2024-0107
Hilary S Dunbar, Catherine C Donahue, Luzita Vela, Jason Freeman, Jacob E Resch
{"title":"名字的含义是什么?有无脑震荡史的大学生运动员的抑郁和焦虑症状","authors":"Hilary S Dunbar, Catherine C Donahue, Luzita Vela, Jason Freeman, Jacob E Resch","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Athletes with a history of concussion (CON) have been demonstrated to have heightened levels of anxiety and depression that may continue well beyond the resolution of concussion symptoms. The global events of 2020 resulted in elevated levels of anxiety and depression in the general population, which may have unequally presented in collegiate athletes with (CON) than those without a history of concussion (NoCON). Using a deception design, our survey-based study compared levels of anxiety and depression in CON and NoCON collegiate athletes in response to the pandemic and social injustices. We hypothesized that the CON group would have significantly elevated anxiety and depression as compared to the NoCON group in response to events of 2020.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Collegiate athletes (N = 106) during the academic 2020-2021 academic year were divided into CON and NoCON groups based on their preinjury (baseline) concussion assessment. Participants completed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SSRS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) via an electronic survey pertaining to the events of 2020. The term \"concussion\" was not used in any study materials which was the basis for our deception-based design. An analysis of covariance was used to compare group CES-D and GAD-7 outcome scores while controlling for the SSRS outcome score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our survey response rate was 14.2% (48/337 [77.1% female]) and 10.1% (58/580 [67.2% female]), for the NoCON and CON groups, respectively. The NoCON group had significantly (F1 = 5.82, P = .018, ηp2=.06) higher anxiety (8.3 [5.89]) as compared to the CON group (5.5 [2.85]). The NoCON group also had significantly (F1 = 13.7, P < .001, ηp2=.12) higher levels of depression (21.0 [12.52]) as compared to the CON group (16.07 [9.10]).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our deception-based study revealed NoCON participants had elevated and clinically relevant mood states as compared to CON participants in response to the events of 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is in a Name? Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Collegiate Athletes With and Without a History of Concussion.\",\"authors\":\"Hilary S Dunbar, Catherine C Donahue, Luzita Vela, Jason Freeman, Jacob E Resch\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jsr.2024-0107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Athletes with a history of concussion (CON) have been demonstrated to have heightened levels of anxiety and depression that may continue well beyond the resolution of concussion symptoms. The global events of 2020 resulted in elevated levels of anxiety and depression in the general population, which may have unequally presented in collegiate athletes with (CON) than those without a history of concussion (NoCON). Using a deception design, our survey-based study compared levels of anxiety and depression in CON and NoCON collegiate athletes in response to the pandemic and social injustices. We hypothesized that the CON group would have significantly elevated anxiety and depression as compared to the NoCON group in response to events of 2020.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Collegiate athletes (N = 106) during the academic 2020-2021 academic year were divided into CON and NoCON groups based on their preinjury (baseline) concussion assessment. Participants completed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SSRS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) via an electronic survey pertaining to the events of 2020. The term \\\"concussion\\\" was not used in any study materials which was the basis for our deception-based design. An analysis of covariance was used to compare group CES-D and GAD-7 outcome scores while controlling for the SSRS outcome score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our survey response rate was 14.2% (48/337 [77.1% female]) and 10.1% (58/580 [67.2% female]), for the NoCON and CON groups, respectively. The NoCON group had significantly (F1 = 5.82, P = .018, ηp2=.06) higher anxiety (8.3 [5.89]) as compared to the CON group (5.5 [2.85]). The NoCON group also had significantly (F1 = 13.7, P < .001, ηp2=.12) higher levels of depression (21.0 [12.52]) as compared to the CON group (16.07 [9.10]).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our deception-based study revealed NoCON participants had elevated and clinically relevant mood states as compared to CON participants in response to the events of 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0107\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有脑震荡(CON)病史的运动员被证明有高度的焦虑和抑郁,这种焦虑和抑郁可能会持续到脑震荡症状消退之后。2020年的全球事件导致普通人群的焦虑和抑郁水平升高,这可能在患有(CON)的大学运动员中与没有脑震荡史的运动员(NoCON)中表现得不一样。采用欺骗设计,我们基于调查的研究比较了CON和NoCON大学运动员对流行病和社会不公正的反应的焦虑和抑郁水平。我们假设,与NoCON组相比,CON组在对2020年事件的反应中,焦虑和抑郁程度会显著升高。设计与方法:根据损伤前(基线)脑震荡评估将2020-2021学年的大学运动员106例分为CON组和NoCON组。参与者通过与2020年事件相关的电子调查完成了社会再适应评定量表(SSRS)、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)和广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7 (GAD-7)。任何研究材料中都没有使用“脑震荡”这个词而这正是我们基于欺骗的设计的基础。采用协方差分析比较CES-D组和GAD-7组的结局评分,同时控制SSRS结局评分。结果:NoCON组和CON组的调查回复率分别为14.2%(48/337[77.1%女性])和10.1%(58/580[67.2%女性])。NoCON组焦虑水平(F1 = 5.82, P = 0.018, ηp2= 0.06)显著高于CON组(5.5[2.85])(8.3[5.89])。与CON组(16.07[9.10])相比,NoCON组抑郁水平(21.0[12.52])显著升高(F1 = 13.7, P < 0.001, ηp2= 0.12)。讨论:我们基于欺骗的研究显示,与CON参与者相比,NoCON参与者在对2020年事件的反应中表现出较高的临床相关情绪状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Is in a Name? Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Collegiate Athletes With and Without a History of Concussion.

Context: Athletes with a history of concussion (CON) have been demonstrated to have heightened levels of anxiety and depression that may continue well beyond the resolution of concussion symptoms. The global events of 2020 resulted in elevated levels of anxiety and depression in the general population, which may have unequally presented in collegiate athletes with (CON) than those without a history of concussion (NoCON). Using a deception design, our survey-based study compared levels of anxiety and depression in CON and NoCON collegiate athletes in response to the pandemic and social injustices. We hypothesized that the CON group would have significantly elevated anxiety and depression as compared to the NoCON group in response to events of 2020.

Design and methods: Collegiate athletes (N = 106) during the academic 2020-2021 academic year were divided into CON and NoCON groups based on their preinjury (baseline) concussion assessment. Participants completed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SSRS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) via an electronic survey pertaining to the events of 2020. The term "concussion" was not used in any study materials which was the basis for our deception-based design. An analysis of covariance was used to compare group CES-D and GAD-7 outcome scores while controlling for the SSRS outcome score.

Results: Our survey response rate was 14.2% (48/337 [77.1% female]) and 10.1% (58/580 [67.2% female]), for the NoCON and CON groups, respectively. The NoCON group had significantly (F1 = 5.82, P = .018, ηp2=.06) higher anxiety (8.3 [5.89]) as compared to the CON group (5.5 [2.85]). The NoCON group also had significantly (F1 = 13.7, P < .001, ηp2=.12) higher levels of depression (21.0 [12.52]) as compared to the CON group (16.07 [9.10]).

Discussion: Our deception-based study revealed NoCON participants had elevated and clinically relevant mood states as compared to CON participants in response to the events of 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
期刊最新文献
Minimizing Running Load via Gentle Heel Strike Techniques: A Gait Modification Study. Treatment Order and Retention of Self-Myofascial Release and Static Stretching on Passive Hip Flexion Range of Motion. Comparing Nerve Versus Muscle Wide-Pulse High-Frequency Electrical Stimulation for Maximal and Submaximal Efforts. Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Individuals With Lateral Elbow Pain: A Randomized Single-Blind Clinical Trial. Persian Version of the Modified Constant Score in Overhead Athletes: A Reliability and Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1