使用基准剂量和贝叶斯模型平均的GMA推荐职业暴露限值。

IF 4.3 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 中国疾病预防控制中心周报 Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.46234/ccdcw2024.277
Zhihao Chen, Meng Wang, Nankun Liu, Shiyu Wang, Feng Tan
{"title":"使用基准剂量和贝叶斯模型平均的GMA推荐职业暴露限值。","authors":"Zhihao Chen, Meng Wang, Nankun Liu, Shiyu Wang, Feng Tan","doi":"10.46234/ccdcw2024.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) is a widely used industrial polymerization material. Current occupational exposure limits (OELs) for GMA in China show significant disparities compared to those established by international regulatory bodies, including the United States, the European Union, and Japan. A comprehensive revision of GMA exposure limits is crucial for ensuring optimal worker protection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation analyzed data from a 104-week inhalation carcinogenicity study of GMA in mice conducted in Japan. This study identified statistically significant pathological endpoints and employed benchmark dose (BMD) analysis to evaluate meaningful endpoints, focusing on those with the lowest benchmark dose lower bound values. The final recommendations were optimized using Bayesian model averaging (BMA) methodology to establish appropriate OELs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis recommends a time-weighted average allowable concentration of 0.01 ppm for GMA, which aligns with international standards established by the European Chemicals Agency (0.016 ppm), Japan Society for Occupational Health (0.012 ppm), and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (0.01 ppm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined application of BMD and BMA methodologies represents a scientifically robust approach for deriving points of departure in risk assessment. These evidence-based OELs are essential for effective occupational hazard management and worker health protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":69039,"journal":{"name":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","volume":"6 52","pages":"1396-1402"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommended Occupational Exposure Limits for GMA Using Benchmark Dose and Bayesian Model Averaging.\",\"authors\":\"Zhihao Chen, Meng Wang, Nankun Liu, Shiyu Wang, Feng Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.46234/ccdcw2024.277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) is a widely used industrial polymerization material. Current occupational exposure limits (OELs) for GMA in China show significant disparities compared to those established by international regulatory bodies, including the United States, the European Union, and Japan. A comprehensive revision of GMA exposure limits is crucial for ensuring optimal worker protection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation analyzed data from a 104-week inhalation carcinogenicity study of GMA in mice conducted in Japan. This study identified statistically significant pathological endpoints and employed benchmark dose (BMD) analysis to evaluate meaningful endpoints, focusing on those with the lowest benchmark dose lower bound values. The final recommendations were optimized using Bayesian model averaging (BMA) methodology to establish appropriate OELs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis recommends a time-weighted average allowable concentration of 0.01 ppm for GMA, which aligns with international standards established by the European Chemicals Agency (0.016 ppm), Japan Society for Occupational Health (0.012 ppm), and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (0.01 ppm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined application of BMD and BMA methodologies represents a scientifically robust approach for deriving points of departure in risk assessment. These evidence-based OELs are essential for effective occupational hazard management and worker health protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":69039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国疾病预防控制中心周报\",\"volume\":\"6 52\",\"pages\":\"1396-1402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国疾病预防控制中心周报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2024.277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2024.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯(GMA)是一种广泛使用的工业聚合材料。与美国、欧盟和日本等国际监管机构制定的标准相比,中国目前的 GMA 职业接触限值(OELs)存在很大差距。全面修订 GMA 接触限值对于确保为工人提供最佳保护至关重要:这项调查分析了在日本进行的为期 104 周的小鼠吸入 GMA 致癌性研究的数据。这项研究确定了具有统计意义的病理终点,并采用基准剂量(BMD)分析来评估有意义的终点,重点关注具有最低基准剂量下限值的终点。采用贝叶斯模型平均法(BMA)对最终建议进行了优化,以确定适当的 OELs:我们的分析建议 GMA 的时间加权平均允许浓度为 0.01 ppm,这与欧洲化学品管理局(0.016 ppm)、日本职业健康学会(0.012 ppm)和美国政府工业卫生学家会议(0.01 ppm)制定的国际标准一致:结论:综合应用 BMD 和 BMA 方法是在风险评估中得出出发点的一种科学可靠的方法。这些以证据为基础的 OEL 对于有效的职业危害管理和工人健康保护至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommended Occupational Exposure Limits for GMA Using Benchmark Dose and Bayesian Model Averaging.

Introduction: Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) is a widely used industrial polymerization material. Current occupational exposure limits (OELs) for GMA in China show significant disparities compared to those established by international regulatory bodies, including the United States, the European Union, and Japan. A comprehensive revision of GMA exposure limits is crucial for ensuring optimal worker protection.

Methods: This investigation analyzed data from a 104-week inhalation carcinogenicity study of GMA in mice conducted in Japan. This study identified statistically significant pathological endpoints and employed benchmark dose (BMD) analysis to evaluate meaningful endpoints, focusing on those with the lowest benchmark dose lower bound values. The final recommendations were optimized using Bayesian model averaging (BMA) methodology to establish appropriate OELs.

Results: Our analysis recommends a time-weighted average allowable concentration of 0.01 ppm for GMA, which aligns with international standards established by the European Chemicals Agency (0.016 ppm), Japan Society for Occupational Health (0.012 ppm), and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (0.01 ppm).

Conclusion: The combined application of BMD and BMA methodologies represents a scientifically robust approach for deriving points of departure in risk assessment. These evidence-based OELs are essential for effective occupational hazard management and worker health protection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological and Spatiotemporal Clustering Analysis of Human Brucellosis - China, 2019-2023. Automatic Warning Practice of Multi-Source Surveillance and Multi-Point Trigger for Infectious Diseases - Yuhang District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China, January-April 2024. Characterization of Aeromonas Strains Isolated from Adult Patients with Diarrhea and Aquatic Environments - Beijing Municipality, China, 2016-2022. Global Species/Biovars and Genotype Diversity Atlas of Brucella spp. - 102 Countries, 1923-2020. Multicenter Study on the Prevalence of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Coinfection and Disease Burden Among Hospitalized Children Aged 5 Years and Younger - 5 Prefecture-level Cities, Zhejiang Province, China, 2018-2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1