Néstor Y. Rojas, Dayana M. Agudelo-Castañeda, Daniela Bustos, Krystal J. Godri Pollitt, Dong Gao, Laura A. Rodriguez-Villamizar
{"title":"哥伦比亚五个城市PM2.5氧化电位的城市间和城市内变化","authors":"Néstor Y. Rojas, Dayana M. Agudelo-Castañeda, Daniela Bustos, Krystal J. Godri Pollitt, Dong Gao, Laura A. Rodriguez-Villamizar","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01632-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) has been shown to cause oxidative stress, which has negative health consequences. The oxidative potential (OP) of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, a promising health exposure metric, was assessed in five Colombian cities using the synthetic respiratory tract lining fluid assay that tracks the depletions of glutathione and ascorbate. For this, a set of 91 integrated 2-week ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples were collected using Ultrasonic Personal Aerosol Samplers (UPAS) at background (5), traffic (37), industrial (12) and residential (37) sites. Across all site types, mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentration was 20.20 ± 9.36 µg m<sup>− 3</sup>. The oxidative potential (OP<sup>AA</sup> for ascorbate and OP<sup>GSH</sup> for glutathione) varied widely across cities with an average of 2.67 ± 1.27 for AA and 2.93 ± 1.22 % depletion m<sup>− 3</sup> for GSH. OP metrics among cities were not correlated with PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations. Overall, industrial sites showed higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations and OP<sup>AA</sup>. In contrast, OP<sup>GSH</sup> was not found to differ among industrial, traffic, or residential sites, but was lower for background sites. Our findings provide substantial evidence of variations in PM<sub>2.5</sub> OP between cities and within the cities. Further research is needed to assess the association between OP and adverse health effects, as well as to attribute the sources that cause such variations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"127 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11869-024-01632-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between and within-city variations of PM2.5 oxidative potential in five cities in Colombia\",\"authors\":\"Néstor Y. Rojas, Dayana M. Agudelo-Castañeda, Daniela Bustos, Krystal J. Godri Pollitt, Dong Gao, Laura A. Rodriguez-Villamizar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11869-024-01632-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) has been shown to cause oxidative stress, which has negative health consequences. The oxidative potential (OP) of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, a promising health exposure metric, was assessed in five Colombian cities using the synthetic respiratory tract lining fluid assay that tracks the depletions of glutathione and ascorbate. For this, a set of 91 integrated 2-week ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples were collected using Ultrasonic Personal Aerosol Samplers (UPAS) at background (5), traffic (37), industrial (12) and residential (37) sites. Across all site types, mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentration was 20.20 ± 9.36 µg m<sup>− 3</sup>. The oxidative potential (OP<sup>AA</sup> for ascorbate and OP<sup>GSH</sup> for glutathione) varied widely across cities with an average of 2.67 ± 1.27 for AA and 2.93 ± 1.22 % depletion m<sup>− 3</sup> for GSH. OP metrics among cities were not correlated with PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations. Overall, industrial sites showed higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations and OP<sup>AA</sup>. In contrast, OP<sup>GSH</sup> was not found to differ among industrial, traffic, or residential sites, but was lower for background sites. Our findings provide substantial evidence of variations in PM<sub>2.5</sub> OP between cities and within the cities. Further research is needed to assess the association between OP and adverse health effects, as well as to attribute the sources that cause such variations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"127 - 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11869-024-01632-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01632-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01632-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Between and within-city variations of PM2.5 oxidative potential in five cities in Colombia
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been shown to cause oxidative stress, which has negative health consequences. The oxidative potential (OP) of PM2.5, a promising health exposure metric, was assessed in five Colombian cities using the synthetic respiratory tract lining fluid assay that tracks the depletions of glutathione and ascorbate. For this, a set of 91 integrated 2-week ambient PM2.5 samples were collected using Ultrasonic Personal Aerosol Samplers (UPAS) at background (5), traffic (37), industrial (12) and residential (37) sites. Across all site types, mean PM2.5 mass concentration was 20.20 ± 9.36 µg m− 3. The oxidative potential (OPAA for ascorbate and OPGSH for glutathione) varied widely across cities with an average of 2.67 ± 1.27 for AA and 2.93 ± 1.22 % depletion m− 3 for GSH. OP metrics among cities were not correlated with PM2.5 mass concentrations. Overall, industrial sites showed higher PM2.5 mass concentrations and OPAA. In contrast, OPGSH was not found to differ among industrial, traffic, or residential sites, but was lower for background sites. Our findings provide substantial evidence of variations in PM2.5 OP between cities and within the cities. Further research is needed to assess the association between OP and adverse health effects, as well as to attribute the sources that cause such variations.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.