致心律失常性右室心肌病:双心室应变在危险分层中的重要性。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.006
Aileen Paula Chua MD , Dorien Laenens MD , Camille Sarrazyn MD , Maria Pilar Lopez-Santi MD , Takeru Nabeta MD , Rinchyenkhand Myagmardorj MD , Marianne Bootsma MD, PhD , Daniela Q.C.M. Barge-Schaapveld MD, PhD , Jeroen J. Bax MD, PhD , Nina Ajmone Marsan MD, PhD
{"title":"致心律失常性右室心肌病:双心室应变在危险分层中的重要性。","authors":"Aileen Paula Chua MD ,&nbsp;Dorien Laenens MD ,&nbsp;Camille Sarrazyn MD ,&nbsp;Maria Pilar Lopez-Santi MD ,&nbsp;Takeru Nabeta MD ,&nbsp;Rinchyenkhand Myagmardorj MD ,&nbsp;Marianne Bootsma MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Daniela Q.C.M. Barge-Schaapveld MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jeroen J. Bax MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nina Ajmone Marsan MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) being predominantly a right ventricular (RV) disease, concomitant left ventricular (LV) involvement has been recognized. ARVC is diagnosed by the RV-centric 2010 Task Force Criteria(TFC) using routine echocardiography, but previous studies have suggested that strain imaging may be more sensitive to detect RV and LV dysfunction. No data however are available regarding the additional value of combining biventricular strain for risk stratification. This study aims to assess the prognostic value of both LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and RV free wall strain (FWLS) in patients with ARVC. To accomplish this, 204 patients who met the TFC for the ARVC spectrum were included. Patients (age 41 ± 17 years,55% men) were divided into impaired(n = 33), discordant (RV or LV impaired, n = 70), and normal (n = 101) strain groups based on a value of ≥18% for both ventricles. During a follow-up of 87 [24–136] months, 57 (28%) experienced the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events, implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy and heart failure events, and a significant difference in event-free survival was observed (p &lt;0.001) between the 3 groups. In the multivariable analysis, the strain groups remained associated with outcomes (p = 0.014) after adjusting for age, sex, history of syncope and definite ARVC diagnosis. A subanalysis including only definite and borderline diagnosed ARVC confirmed that the strain groups were independently predictive of the endpoint (p = 0.023). In conclusion, biventricular involvement by strain analysis may help risk stratification in ARVC patients, with the worst outcomes of patients with both RV and LV impaired strain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: The Importance of Biventricular Strain in Risk-Stratification\",\"authors\":\"Aileen Paula Chua MD ,&nbsp;Dorien Laenens MD ,&nbsp;Camille Sarrazyn MD ,&nbsp;Maria Pilar Lopez-Santi MD ,&nbsp;Takeru Nabeta MD ,&nbsp;Rinchyenkhand Myagmardorj MD ,&nbsp;Marianne Bootsma MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Daniela Q.C.M. Barge-Schaapveld MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jeroen J. Bax MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nina Ajmone Marsan MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) being predominantly a right ventricular (RV) disease, concomitant left ventricular (LV) involvement has been recognized. ARVC is diagnosed by the RV-centric 2010 Task Force Criteria(TFC) using routine echocardiography, but previous studies have suggested that strain imaging may be more sensitive to detect RV and LV dysfunction. No data however are available regarding the additional value of combining biventricular strain for risk stratification. This study aims to assess the prognostic value of both LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and RV free wall strain (FWLS) in patients with ARVC. To accomplish this, 204 patients who met the TFC for the ARVC spectrum were included. Patients (age 41 ± 17 years,55% men) were divided into impaired(n = 33), discordant (RV or LV impaired, n = 70), and normal (n = 101) strain groups based on a value of ≥18% for both ventricles. During a follow-up of 87 [24–136] months, 57 (28%) experienced the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events, implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy and heart failure events, and a significant difference in event-free survival was observed (p &lt;0.001) between the 3 groups. In the multivariable analysis, the strain groups remained associated with outcomes (p = 0.014) after adjusting for age, sex, history of syncope and definite ARVC diagnosis. A subanalysis including only definite and borderline diagnosed ARVC confirmed that the strain groups were independently predictive of the endpoint (p = 0.023). In conclusion, biventricular involvement by strain analysis may help risk stratification in ARVC patients, with the worst outcomes of patients with both RV and LV impaired strain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"241 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 61-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925000141\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925000141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVC)主要是一种右室(RV)疾病,但也已认识到伴有左室(LV)受累。ARVC是由以RV为中心的2010年工作组标准(TFC)使用常规超声心动图诊断的,但先前的研究表明,应变成像可能对检测左室和左室功能障碍更敏感。然而,没有关于联合双心室应变对风险分层的附加价值的数据。本研究旨在评估左室总纵向应变(GLS)和左室游离壁应变(FWLS)在ARVC患者中的预后价值。为了实现这一目标,我们纳入了204名符合ARVC谱TFC标准的患者。患者(年龄41±17岁,男性55%)根据双心室≥18%的值分为受损组(n=33)、不协调组(右室或左室受损,n=70)和正常组(n=101)。在87个月的随访中[24-136],57例(28%)患者经历了全因死亡、心律失常事件、植入式心律转复除颤器治疗和心力衰竭事件的复合结局,观察到无事件生存率的显著差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: The Importance of Biventricular Strain in Risk-Stratification
Despite arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) being predominantly a right ventricular (RV) disease, concomitant left ventricular (LV) involvement has been recognized. ARVC is diagnosed by the RV-centric 2010 Task Force Criteria(TFC) using routine echocardiography, but previous studies have suggested that strain imaging may be more sensitive to detect RV and LV dysfunction. No data however are available regarding the additional value of combining biventricular strain for risk stratification. This study aims to assess the prognostic value of both LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and RV free wall strain (FWLS) in patients with ARVC. To accomplish this, 204 patients who met the TFC for the ARVC spectrum were included. Patients (age 41 ± 17 years,55% men) were divided into impaired(n = 33), discordant (RV or LV impaired, n = 70), and normal (n = 101) strain groups based on a value of ≥18% for both ventricles. During a follow-up of 87 [24–136] months, 57 (28%) experienced the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events, implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy and heart failure events, and a significant difference in event-free survival was observed (p <0.001) between the 3 groups. In the multivariable analysis, the strain groups remained associated with outcomes (p = 0.014) after adjusting for age, sex, history of syncope and definite ARVC diagnosis. A subanalysis including only definite and borderline diagnosed ARVC confirmed that the strain groups were independently predictive of the endpoint (p = 0.023). In conclusion, biventricular involvement by strain analysis may help risk stratification in ARVC patients, with the worst outcomes of patients with both RV and LV impaired strain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Prospective Comparison of Temporal Myocardial Function in Men versus Women After Anterior ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction with Timely Reperfusion. The Relationship Between Syncope and Cardiac Index in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Editorial Board Contents Adequacy of Loop Diuretic Dosing in Treatment of Acute Heart Failure: Insights from the BAN-ADHF Diuretic Resistance Risk Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1