头戴式摄像机作为外科模拟训练的汇报工具:塞内加尔的一项随机对照研究。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06598-2
Abdourahmane Ndong, Adja C Diallo, Armaun D Rouhi, Diago A Dia, Sebastian Leon, Cheikhou Dieng, Mohamed L Diao, Jacques N Tendeng, Noel N Williams, Mamadou Cissé, Kristoffel R Dumon, Ibrahima Konaté
{"title":"头戴式摄像机作为外科模拟训练的汇报工具:塞内加尔的一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Abdourahmane Ndong, Adja C Diallo, Armaun D Rouhi, Diago A Dia, Sebastian Leon, Cheikhou Dieng, Mohamed L Diao, Jacques N Tendeng, Noel N Williams, Mamadou Cissé, Kristoffel R Dumon, Ibrahima Konaté","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06598-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Video feedback, particularly with a head-mounted camera, has previously been described as a useful debriefing tool in well-funded health systems but has never been performed in a low-resource environment. The purpose of this randomized, intervention-controlled study is to evaluate the feasibility of using video feedback with a head-mounted camera during intestinal anastomosis simulation training in a low-resource setting.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study recruited 14 first-year surgery residents in Senegal, who were randomized into control and camera groups. Both groups received reading materials and video lectures before performing a manual end-to-end intestinal anastomosis using a synthetic model. The control group received oral feedback, while the camera group's first attempt was recorded, reviewed, and discussed before the second attempt. The primary outcomes were OSATS scores and completion time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in OSATS scores from the first to the second attempt (control group: p = 0.002; camera group: p = 0.0021). The camera group demonstrated a significant reduction in completion time on the second attempt (p = 0.0038), unlike the control group (p = 0.17). Both groups reported increased confidence in performing the task (control group: p = 0.003; camera group: p = 0.0029) and had positive perceptions of the workshop's effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study suggests that video feedback with a head-mounted camera is feasible and effective for debriefing during intestinal anastomosis simulation training in a low-resource setting, offering a low-cost, effective way to enhance technical skills. Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended to validate these findings and explore long-term impacts on surgical proficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Head-mounted camera as a debriefing tool for surgical simulation-based training: a randomized controlled study in Senegal.\",\"authors\":\"Abdourahmane Ndong, Adja C Diallo, Armaun D Rouhi, Diago A Dia, Sebastian Leon, Cheikhou Dieng, Mohamed L Diao, Jacques N Tendeng, Noel N Williams, Mamadou Cissé, Kristoffel R Dumon, Ibrahima Konaté\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-024-06598-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Video feedback, particularly with a head-mounted camera, has previously been described as a useful debriefing tool in well-funded health systems but has never been performed in a low-resource environment. The purpose of this randomized, intervention-controlled study is to evaluate the feasibility of using video feedback with a head-mounted camera during intestinal anastomosis simulation training in a low-resource setting.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study recruited 14 first-year surgery residents in Senegal, who were randomized into control and camera groups. Both groups received reading materials and video lectures before performing a manual end-to-end intestinal anastomosis using a synthetic model. The control group received oral feedback, while the camera group's first attempt was recorded, reviewed, and discussed before the second attempt. The primary outcomes were OSATS scores and completion time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in OSATS scores from the first to the second attempt (control group: p = 0.002; camera group: p = 0.0021). The camera group demonstrated a significant reduction in completion time on the second attempt (p = 0.0038), unlike the control group (p = 0.17). Both groups reported increased confidence in performing the task (control group: p = 0.003; camera group: p = 0.0029) and had positive perceptions of the workshop's effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study suggests that video feedback with a head-mounted camera is feasible and effective for debriefing during intestinal anastomosis simulation training in a low-resource setting, offering a low-cost, effective way to enhance technical skills. Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended to validate these findings and explore long-term impacts on surgical proficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731528/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06598-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06598-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视频反馈,特别是头戴式摄像机,以前曾被描述为资金充足的卫生系统中有用的汇报工具,但从未在资源匮乏的环境中实施过。这项随机、干预对照研究的目的是评估在低资源环境下,在肠道吻合模拟训练中使用头戴式摄像机视频反馈的可行性。方法:本研究招募了14名塞内加尔一年级外科住院医师,随机分为对照组和观察组。两组均接受阅读材料和视频讲座,然后使用合成模型进行人工端到端肠吻合。对照组接受口头反馈,而拍照组的第一次尝试在第二次尝试前被记录、审查和讨论。主要指标为OSATS评分和完成时间。结果:两组间无统计学差异。两组患者的OSATS评分从第一次到第二次均有显著改善(对照组:p = 0.002;相机组:p = 0.0021)。与对照组(p = 0.17)不同,相机组在第二次尝试时完成时间显着减少(p = 0.0038)。两组都报告在执行任务时信心增加(对照组:p = 0.003;相机组:p = 0.0029),对工作坊的有效性有积极的看法。结论:本初步研究表明,在低资源环境下,头戴式摄像机视频反馈用于肠吻合模拟训练述评是可行和有效的,为提高技术技能提供了一种低成本、有效的途径。建议进一步研究更大的样本量来验证这些发现,并探讨对手术熟练程度的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Head-mounted camera as a debriefing tool for surgical simulation-based training: a randomized controlled study in Senegal.

Introduction: Video feedback, particularly with a head-mounted camera, has previously been described as a useful debriefing tool in well-funded health systems but has never been performed in a low-resource environment. The purpose of this randomized, intervention-controlled study is to evaluate the feasibility of using video feedback with a head-mounted camera during intestinal anastomosis simulation training in a low-resource setting.

Methodology: This study recruited 14 first-year surgery residents in Senegal, who were randomized into control and camera groups. Both groups received reading materials and video lectures before performing a manual end-to-end intestinal anastomosis using a synthetic model. The control group received oral feedback, while the camera group's first attempt was recorded, reviewed, and discussed before the second attempt. The primary outcomes were OSATS scores and completion time.

Results: There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in OSATS scores from the first to the second attempt (control group: p = 0.002; camera group: p = 0.0021). The camera group demonstrated a significant reduction in completion time on the second attempt (p = 0.0038), unlike the control group (p = 0.17). Both groups reported increased confidence in performing the task (control group: p = 0.003; camera group: p = 0.0029) and had positive perceptions of the workshop's effectiveness.

Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that video feedback with a head-mounted camera is feasible and effective for debriefing during intestinal anastomosis simulation training in a low-resource setting, offering a low-cost, effective way to enhance technical skills. Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended to validate these findings and explore long-term impacts on surgical proficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring and evaluation in disaster management courses: a scoping review. AI-based medical ethics education: examining the potential of large language models as a tool for virtue cultivation. Knowledge and attitudes towards Alzheimer's disease and related dementias among Nigerian medical and nursing students: a comparative study. Medical students and ChatGPT: analyzing attitudes, practices, and academic perceptions. The impact of hidden curriculum factors on professional adaptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1