为院外心脏骤停提供自动体外除颤器的无人机:范围审查。

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100841
Louise Kollander Jakobsen , Victor Kjærulf , Janet Bray , Theresa Mariero Olasveengen , Fredrik Folke , on behalf of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Basic Life Support Task Force
{"title":"为院外心脏骤停提供自动体外除颤器的无人机:范围审查。","authors":"Louise Kollander Jakobsen ,&nbsp;Victor Kjærulf ,&nbsp;Janet Bray ,&nbsp;Theresa Mariero Olasveengen ,&nbsp;Fredrik Folke ,&nbsp;on behalf of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Basic Life Support Task Force","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a critical health concern, where prompt access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) significantly improves survival. This scoping review broadly investigates the feasibility and impact of dronedelivered AEDs for OHCA response. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 6, 2024, with eligibility broadly including empirical data. The charting process involved iterative data extraction for thematic analysis. Results: We identified 306 titles and, after duplicate removal, title/abstract screening, and full text review, included 39 studies. These were divided into three categories: 1) Real-world observational studies (n = 3), 2) Test flights/simulation studies and qualitative analyses (n = 15), and 3) Computer/prediction models (n = 21). Real-world studies demonstrated the feasibility of drone AED delivery, with a time advantage of 01:52 – 03:14 min over ambulances observed in 64–67 % of cases. Test flight/simulation and qualitative studies consistently reported feasibility and positive bystander experiences. Computer/prediction models exhibited considerable heterogeneity, yet all indicated significant time savings for AED delivery compared to traditional EMS methods. Moreover, seven studies estimated improved survival rates, with five assessing cost-effectiveness and favouring drone systems. Regional factors such as EMS response times, volunteer responder programmes, terrain, weather, and budget constraints influenced the system’s effectiveness. Conclusion: Across all categories, studies confirmed the feasibility of drone-delivered AED systems, with significant potential for reducing time to AED arrival compared to EMS arrival. Prediction models suggested enhanced survival alongside costeffectiveness. Further research, including more extensive real-world studies and regulatory advancements, is imperative to integrate drones effectively into OHCA response systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100841"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drones delivering automated external defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Louise Kollander Jakobsen ,&nbsp;Victor Kjærulf ,&nbsp;Janet Bray ,&nbsp;Theresa Mariero Olasveengen ,&nbsp;Fredrik Folke ,&nbsp;on behalf of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Basic Life Support Task Force\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a critical health concern, where prompt access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) significantly improves survival. This scoping review broadly investigates the feasibility and impact of dronedelivered AEDs for OHCA response. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 6, 2024, with eligibility broadly including empirical data. The charting process involved iterative data extraction for thematic analysis. Results: We identified 306 titles and, after duplicate removal, title/abstract screening, and full text review, included 39 studies. These were divided into three categories: 1) Real-world observational studies (n = 3), 2) Test flights/simulation studies and qualitative analyses (n = 15), and 3) Computer/prediction models (n = 21). Real-world studies demonstrated the feasibility of drone AED delivery, with a time advantage of 01:52 – 03:14 min over ambulances observed in 64–67 % of cases. Test flight/simulation and qualitative studies consistently reported feasibility and positive bystander experiences. Computer/prediction models exhibited considerable heterogeneity, yet all indicated significant time savings for AED delivery compared to traditional EMS methods. Moreover, seven studies estimated improved survival rates, with five assessing cost-effectiveness and favouring drone systems. Regional factors such as EMS response times, volunteer responder programmes, terrain, weather, and budget constraints influenced the system’s effectiveness. Conclusion: Across all categories, studies confirmed the feasibility of drone-delivered AED systems, with significant potential for reducing time to AED arrival compared to EMS arrival. Prediction models suggested enhanced survival alongside costeffectiveness. Further research, including more extensive real-world studies and regulatory advancements, is imperative to integrate drones effectively into OHCA response systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100841\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730569/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

院外心脏骤停(OHCA)仍然是一个严重的健康问题,其中及时获得自动体外除颤器(aed)可显着提高生存率。这篇范围综述广泛调查了无人机运送aed对OHCA响应的可行性和影响。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane和Web of Science从成立到2024年8月6日,检索范围广泛,包括经验数据。绘制图表的过程涉及为专题分析反复抽取数据。结果:我们确定了306个标题,经过重复删除、标题/摘要筛选和全文审查,包括39项研究。这些研究分为三类:1)真实世界观察研究(n = 3), 2)试飞/模拟研究和定性分析(n = 15),以及3)计算机/预测模型(n = 21)。现实世界的研究证明了无人机运送AED的可行性,在64- 67%的病例中,无人机比救护车的时间优势为01:52 - 03:14分钟。试飞/模拟和定性研究一致报告了可行性和积极的旁观者经验。计算机/预测模型显示出相当大的异质性,但所有模型都表明,与传统的EMS方法相比,AED交付时间显著节省。此外,有7项研究估计提高了存活率,其中5项研究评估了成本效益,并支持无人机系统。区域因素,如紧急医疗服务系统的响应时间、志愿救援计划、地形、天气和预算限制,都会影响系统的有效性。结论:在所有类别中,研究都证实了无人机交付AED系统的可行性,与EMS相比,无人机交付AED系统具有显著的缩短到达时间的潜力。预测模型显示,在提高成本效益的同时,生存率也有所提高。为了将无人机有效地整合到OHCA响应系统中,进一步的研究,包括更广泛的现实世界研究和监管进步,是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drones delivering automated external defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review

Aim

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a critical health concern, where prompt access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) significantly improves survival. This scoping review broadly investigates the feasibility and impact of dronedelivered AEDs for OHCA response. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 6, 2024, with eligibility broadly including empirical data. The charting process involved iterative data extraction for thematic analysis. Results: We identified 306 titles and, after duplicate removal, title/abstract screening, and full text review, included 39 studies. These were divided into three categories: 1) Real-world observational studies (n = 3), 2) Test flights/simulation studies and qualitative analyses (n = 15), and 3) Computer/prediction models (n = 21). Real-world studies demonstrated the feasibility of drone AED delivery, with a time advantage of 01:52 – 03:14 min over ambulances observed in 64–67 % of cases. Test flight/simulation and qualitative studies consistently reported feasibility and positive bystander experiences. Computer/prediction models exhibited considerable heterogeneity, yet all indicated significant time savings for AED delivery compared to traditional EMS methods. Moreover, seven studies estimated improved survival rates, with five assessing cost-effectiveness and favouring drone systems. Regional factors such as EMS response times, volunteer responder programmes, terrain, weather, and budget constraints influenced the system’s effectiveness. Conclusion: Across all categories, studies confirmed the feasibility of drone-delivered AED systems, with significant potential for reducing time to AED arrival compared to EMS arrival. Prediction models suggested enhanced survival alongside costeffectiveness. Further research, including more extensive real-world studies and regulatory advancements, is imperative to integrate drones effectively into OHCA response systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Measurement properties of the Minimal Insomnia Symptom Scale (MISS) among cardiac arrest survivors – A Rasch evaluation study A survey of team culture and learning organization in the resuscitation of neonates with congenital anomalies: A single center experience Effectiveness of chain of survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries: A systematic review Potential benefits and challenges of simulation-based neonatal resuscitation competition: A survey analysis of provincial competition in China Exoskeletons as potential devices to support and enhance rescuers’ chest compression performance during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1