何谓运输充足?量化荷兰经历过的交通贫困

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100982
Dick Ettema , Dea van Lierop , Xingxing Fu , Pauline van den Berg , Iris Geigenmüller
{"title":"何谓运输充足?量化荷兰经历过的交通贫困","authors":"Dick Ettema ,&nbsp;Dea van Lierop ,&nbsp;Xingxing Fu ,&nbsp;Pauline van den Berg ,&nbsp;Iris Geigenmüller","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is increasingly recognized that access to transportation options and relevant destinations is not equally distributed across the population, calling for quantitative indicators to identify groups at risk of transport poverty and exclusion. While this has most commonly been done using accessibility measures based on objective land use and transportation data, we argue that subjective self-reported measures of travel options and accessibility are a useful complement, as they are more suited to account for travellers’ perceptions of limitations in the transportation system and outcomes of these limitations, such as limited access to desired destinations and the fulfilment of needs. Building on initial developments in the field of self-reported perceived accessibility, this paper describes the development and test of a comprehensive quantitative measurement scale of perceived transport adequacy. We propose an eight-item scale, which was tested on data collected in the cities of Utrecht and Rotterdam, the Netherlands in 2021, with a specific emphasis on including socially vulnerable populations in our sample. The transport adequacy scale has a high internal consistency, and a considerable variation across the sample. Descriptive and regression analyses suggest that transport adequacy is lower for those with lower incomes, no car access, and using mobility aids. Finally, subjective transport adequacy is associated with life outcomes, such as achievements in life, quality of social interactions and life satisfaction. The transport adequacy scale is a meaningful indicator of the extent to which travel needs are met and can be a useful tool to monitor autonomous developments and mobility interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100982"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is Transport Adequacy? Quantifying experienced transport poverty in the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Dick Ettema ,&nbsp;Dea van Lierop ,&nbsp;Xingxing Fu ,&nbsp;Pauline van den Berg ,&nbsp;Iris Geigenmüller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It is increasingly recognized that access to transportation options and relevant destinations is not equally distributed across the population, calling for quantitative indicators to identify groups at risk of transport poverty and exclusion. While this has most commonly been done using accessibility measures based on objective land use and transportation data, we argue that subjective self-reported measures of travel options and accessibility are a useful complement, as they are more suited to account for travellers’ perceptions of limitations in the transportation system and outcomes of these limitations, such as limited access to desired destinations and the fulfilment of needs. Building on initial developments in the field of self-reported perceived accessibility, this paper describes the development and test of a comprehensive quantitative measurement scale of perceived transport adequacy. We propose an eight-item scale, which was tested on data collected in the cities of Utrecht and Rotterdam, the Netherlands in 2021, with a specific emphasis on including socially vulnerable populations in our sample. The transport adequacy scale has a high internal consistency, and a considerable variation across the sample. Descriptive and regression analyses suggest that transport adequacy is lower for those with lower incomes, no car access, and using mobility aids. Finally, subjective transport adequacy is associated with life outcomes, such as achievements in life, quality of social interactions and life satisfaction. The transport adequacy scale is a meaningful indicator of the extent to which travel needs are met and can be a useful tool to monitor autonomous developments and mobility interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100982\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X2400245X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X2400245X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们日益认识到,各种交通选择和相关目的地在人口中的分布并不均衡,因此需要制定量化指标,以确定面临交通贫困和被排斥风险的群体。虽然这通常是使用基于客观土地利用和交通数据的可达性措施来完成的,但我们认为,主观的自我报告的旅行选择和可达性措施是一个有用的补充,因为它们更适合解释旅行者对交通系统局限性的看法以及这些局限性的结果,例如到达预期目的地的途径有限,需求的实现有限。基于自我报告感知可达性领域的初步发展,本文描述了感知交通充足性的综合定量测量量表的开发和测试。我们提出了一个包含八个项目的量表,并对2021年在荷兰乌得勒支和鹿特丹收集的数据进行了测试,特别强调将社会弱势群体纳入我们的样本。运输充分性量表具有很高的内部一致性,并且在样本中存在相当大的差异。描述性和回归分析表明,对于那些收入较低、没有汽车通道和使用交通辅助工具的人来说,交通充足性较低。最后,主观交通充分性与生活结果有关,如生活成就、社会交往质量和生活满意度。交通充分性量表是衡量出行需求得到满足程度的一个有意义的指标,可以成为监测自主发展和交通干预措施的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is Transport Adequacy? Quantifying experienced transport poverty in the Netherlands
It is increasingly recognized that access to transportation options and relevant destinations is not equally distributed across the population, calling for quantitative indicators to identify groups at risk of transport poverty and exclusion. While this has most commonly been done using accessibility measures based on objective land use and transportation data, we argue that subjective self-reported measures of travel options and accessibility are a useful complement, as they are more suited to account for travellers’ perceptions of limitations in the transportation system and outcomes of these limitations, such as limited access to desired destinations and the fulfilment of needs. Building on initial developments in the field of self-reported perceived accessibility, this paper describes the development and test of a comprehensive quantitative measurement scale of perceived transport adequacy. We propose an eight-item scale, which was tested on data collected in the cities of Utrecht and Rotterdam, the Netherlands in 2021, with a specific emphasis on including socially vulnerable populations in our sample. The transport adequacy scale has a high internal consistency, and a considerable variation across the sample. Descriptive and regression analyses suggest that transport adequacy is lower for those with lower incomes, no car access, and using mobility aids. Finally, subjective transport adequacy is associated with life outcomes, such as achievements in life, quality of social interactions and life satisfaction. The transport adequacy scale is a meaningful indicator of the extent to which travel needs are met and can be a useful tool to monitor autonomous developments and mobility interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the retardant effectiveness of node-based driving restriction policies in mitigating congestion Car ownership through the parenting journey and beyond Built environment effects on dockless bikesharing–metro integration: A spatial nonlinear analysis Traffic crash risk among on-demand food delivery riders in Danang city, Vietnam: Key contributing factors Changes in the predictors of transit ridership in post-COVID-19 US metropolitan areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1