Jennifer Xu, Matthew Alberto, Dixon Woon, Damien Bolton, Joseph Ischia
{"title":"COVID - 19大流行与泌尿外科——反思澳大利亚的成功举措和经验教训","authors":"Jennifer Xu, Matthew Alberto, Dixon Woon, Damien Bolton, Joseph Ischia","doi":"10.1111/bju.16652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo summarise the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on urological practice globally with a focus on Australian initiatives, as the pandemic resulted in radical changes in healthcare infrastructure and policies.MethodsWe conducted a literature review of the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) and Web of Science medical databases. The key terms used to conduct our search algorithm comprised of ‘COVID’, ‘wait list or wait time or delay’, ‘urology’, ‘surgery’ and ‘outcomes’, and generated 231 articles. Abstracts were reviewed for relevance and 40 studies selected for full‐text review. Society position statements and government level press release statements were identified through citation tracking and additionally included.Results/discussionThe halt on elective surgical services during the pandemic was deemed necessary to curb infection rates and conserve healthcare resources. However, it resulted in extended wait times and large surgical backlogs with major downstream effects. Australia fared favourably with regards to infection rates compared to international populations consequent upon strict border control, vaccine mandates, and stringent lockdowns. However, similar trends were noted in both oncological and non‐oncological urology service reduction, resulting in significant concerns regarding the long‐term sequelae of delayed surgery and missed appointments upon patient clinical outcome. Initiatives including collaborative partnerships between public and private hospital sectors, government‐funded programmes and adoption of telehealth were successfully established as part of Australia's efforts to stabilise our healthcare system in response to the pandemic.ConclusionAustralia's pandemic efforts have highlighted the escalating imbalance between increasing demand from a growing and ageing population on an already over‐burdened system with finite resources. The additional strain of managing post‐COVID‐19 pandemic fallout in this context provides further challenges for clinicians and healthcare administrators alike. Collaboration by all stakeholders must continue in order to seek innovative solutions to maximise efficiency of healthcare service utilisation, so that quality universal healthcare provision may continue in the future.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The COVID‐19 pandemic and Urology – reflecting on successful initiatives and lessons in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Xu, Matthew Alberto, Dixon Woon, Damien Bolton, Joseph Ischia\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bju.16652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesTo summarise the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on urological practice globally with a focus on Australian initiatives, as the pandemic resulted in radical changes in healthcare infrastructure and policies.MethodsWe conducted a literature review of the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) and Web of Science medical databases. The key terms used to conduct our search algorithm comprised of ‘COVID’, ‘wait list or wait time or delay’, ‘urology’, ‘surgery’ and ‘outcomes’, and generated 231 articles. Abstracts were reviewed for relevance and 40 studies selected for full‐text review. Society position statements and government level press release statements were identified through citation tracking and additionally included.Results/discussionThe halt on elective surgical services during the pandemic was deemed necessary to curb infection rates and conserve healthcare resources. However, it resulted in extended wait times and large surgical backlogs with major downstream effects. Australia fared favourably with regards to infection rates compared to international populations consequent upon strict border control, vaccine mandates, and stringent lockdowns. However, similar trends were noted in both oncological and non‐oncological urology service reduction, resulting in significant concerns regarding the long‐term sequelae of delayed surgery and missed appointments upon patient clinical outcome. Initiatives including collaborative partnerships between public and private hospital sectors, government‐funded programmes and adoption of telehealth were successfully established as part of Australia's efforts to stabilise our healthcare system in response to the pandemic.ConclusionAustralia's pandemic efforts have highlighted the escalating imbalance between increasing demand from a growing and ageing population on an already over‐burdened system with finite resources. The additional strain of managing post‐COVID‐19 pandemic fallout in this context provides further challenges for clinicians and healthcare administrators alike. Collaboration by all stakeholders must continue in order to seek innovative solutions to maximise efficiency of healthcare service utilisation, so that quality universal healthcare provision may continue in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJU International\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJU International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16652\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16652","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的总结2019年冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)大流行对全球泌尿外科实践的影响,重点关注澳大利亚的举措,因为大流行导致医疗基础设施和政策发生了根本性变化。方法对医学文献分析与检索系统(MEDLINE)、医学摘录数据库(EMBASE)和Web of Science医学数据库进行文献综述。用于执行我们搜索算法的关键术语包括“COVID”、“等待名单或等待时间或延迟”、“泌尿外科”、“手术”和“结果”,并生成了231篇文章。对摘要进行相关性审查,并选择40项研究进行全文审查。通过引文跟踪识别社会立场声明和政府层面的新闻稿声明,并将其附加在内。结果/讨论大流行期间暂停选择性手术服务被认为是控制感染率和节约医疗资源的必要措施。然而,这导致了等待时间延长和大量手术积压,并产生了主要的下游影响。由于严格的边境管制、疫苗授权和严格的封锁,与国际人口相比,澳大利亚在感染率方面表现良好。然而,在肿瘤和非肿瘤泌尿外科服务减少中也发现了类似的趋势,这导致了对延迟手术和错过预约对患者临床结果的长期后遗症的重大关注。作为澳大利亚稳定医疗体系以应对疫情努力的一部分,包括公立和私立医院部门之间的合作伙伴关系、政府资助的项目和采用远程医疗在内的举措已经成功确立。澳大利亚的疫情防控工作凸显了日益增长的人口和老龄化人口在资源有限、负担过重的系统中不断增加的需求之间不断加剧的不平衡。在这种背景下,管理COVID - 19后大流行后果的额外压力为临床医生和医疗保健管理人员带来了进一步的挑战。所有利益攸关方必须继续合作,以寻求创新的解决方案,最大限度地提高医疗保健服务的利用效率,以便在未来继续提供高质量的全民医疗保健。
The COVID‐19 pandemic and Urology – reflecting on successful initiatives and lessons in Australia
ObjectivesTo summarise the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on urological practice globally with a focus on Australian initiatives, as the pandemic resulted in radical changes in healthcare infrastructure and policies.MethodsWe conducted a literature review of the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) and Web of Science medical databases. The key terms used to conduct our search algorithm comprised of ‘COVID’, ‘wait list or wait time or delay’, ‘urology’, ‘surgery’ and ‘outcomes’, and generated 231 articles. Abstracts were reviewed for relevance and 40 studies selected for full‐text review. Society position statements and government level press release statements were identified through citation tracking and additionally included.Results/discussionThe halt on elective surgical services during the pandemic was deemed necessary to curb infection rates and conserve healthcare resources. However, it resulted in extended wait times and large surgical backlogs with major downstream effects. Australia fared favourably with regards to infection rates compared to international populations consequent upon strict border control, vaccine mandates, and stringent lockdowns. However, similar trends were noted in both oncological and non‐oncological urology service reduction, resulting in significant concerns regarding the long‐term sequelae of delayed surgery and missed appointments upon patient clinical outcome. Initiatives including collaborative partnerships between public and private hospital sectors, government‐funded programmes and adoption of telehealth were successfully established as part of Australia's efforts to stabilise our healthcare system in response to the pandemic.ConclusionAustralia's pandemic efforts have highlighted the escalating imbalance between increasing demand from a growing and ageing population on an already over‐burdened system with finite resources. The additional strain of managing post‐COVID‐19 pandemic fallout in this context provides further challenges for clinicians and healthcare administrators alike. Collaboration by all stakeholders must continue in order to seek innovative solutions to maximise efficiency of healthcare service utilisation, so that quality universal healthcare provision may continue in the future.
期刊介绍:
BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.