Chenyu Xiong, Yuefeng Meng, Yao Wang, Bingyue Ling, Mengyu Ma, Hao Yan, Feiyu Kang, Dong Zhou and Baohua Li
{"title":"更安全、更耐用锂电池的贫溶剂固体电解质:重要综述","authors":"Chenyu Xiong, Yuefeng Meng, Yao Wang, Bingyue Ling, Mengyu Ma, Hao Yan, Feiyu Kang, Dong Zhou and Baohua Li","doi":"10.1039/D4EE05293E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Pursuing safer and more durable electrolytes is imperative in the relentless quest for lithium batteries with higher energy density and longer lifespan. Unlike all-solid electrolytes, prevailing quasi-solid electrolytes exhibit satisfactory conductivity and interfacial wetting. However, excessive solvent (>60 wt%) as a plasticizer triggers safety concerns and questionable electrode compatibility. Recent studies have underscored that minimizing the liquid solvent content below 20 wt% can improve battery safety and cyclability. Unfortunately, this emerging “lean-solvent” system is often, and somewhat misleadingly, categorized under all-solid electrolytes, thereby obscuring the presence of liquid components. In this Review, we provide unprecedented comprehensive insight into the unique solvation structure, interfacial behavior, and fundamental properties of lean-solvent solid electrolytes (LSEs), including lean-solvent polymer electrolytes (polymer-LSEs), lean-solvent porous electrolytes (porous-LSEs), and lean-solvent inorganic electrolytes (inorganic-LSEs). Finally, we elucidate the dominant challenges in developing safe and durable LSE-based batteries, providing a perspective for future research and technological breakthroughs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":" 4","pages":" 1612-1629"},"PeriodicalIF":32.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lean-solvent solid electrolytes for safer and more durable lithium batteries: a crucial review†\",\"authors\":\"Chenyu Xiong, Yuefeng Meng, Yao Wang, Bingyue Ling, Mengyu Ma, Hao Yan, Feiyu Kang, Dong Zhou and Baohua Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4EE05293E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Pursuing safer and more durable electrolytes is imperative in the relentless quest for lithium batteries with higher energy density and longer lifespan. Unlike all-solid electrolytes, prevailing quasi-solid electrolytes exhibit satisfactory conductivity and interfacial wetting. However, excessive solvent (>60 wt%) as a plasticizer triggers safety concerns and questionable electrode compatibility. Recent studies have underscored that minimizing the liquid solvent content below 20 wt% can improve battery safety and cyclability. Unfortunately, this emerging “lean-solvent” system is often, and somewhat misleadingly, categorized under all-solid electrolytes, thereby obscuring the presence of liquid components. In this Review, we provide unprecedented comprehensive insight into the unique solvation structure, interfacial behavior, and fundamental properties of lean-solvent solid electrolytes (LSEs), including lean-solvent polymer electrolytes (polymer-LSEs), lean-solvent porous electrolytes (porous-LSEs), and lean-solvent inorganic electrolytes (inorganic-LSEs). Finally, we elucidate the dominant challenges in developing safe and durable LSE-based batteries, providing a perspective for future research and technological breakthroughs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\" 1612-1629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":32.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ee/d4ee05293e\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ee/d4ee05293e","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lean-solvent solid electrolytes for safer and more durable lithium batteries: a crucial review†
Pursuing safer and more durable electrolytes is imperative in the relentless quest for lithium batteries with higher energy density and longer lifespan. Unlike all-solid electrolytes, prevailing quasi-solid electrolytes exhibit satisfactory conductivity and interfacial wetting. However, excessive solvent (>60 wt%) as a plasticizer triggers safety concerns and questionable electrode compatibility. Recent studies have underscored that minimizing the liquid solvent content below 20 wt% can improve battery safety and cyclability. Unfortunately, this emerging “lean-solvent” system is often, and somewhat misleadingly, categorized under all-solid electrolytes, thereby obscuring the presence of liquid components. In this Review, we provide unprecedented comprehensive insight into the unique solvation structure, interfacial behavior, and fundamental properties of lean-solvent solid electrolytes (LSEs), including lean-solvent polymer electrolytes (polymer-LSEs), lean-solvent porous electrolytes (porous-LSEs), and lean-solvent inorganic electrolytes (inorganic-LSEs). Finally, we elucidate the dominant challenges in developing safe and durable LSE-based batteries, providing a perspective for future research and technological breakthroughs.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).