Don-Jean Léandri-Breton, Kyle H. Elliott, Arnaud Tarroux, Pierre Legagneux, William Jouanneau, Françoise Amélineau, Frédéric Angelier, Pierre Blévin, Vegard Sandøy Bråthen, Per Fauchald, Geir W. Gabrielsen, Aurélie Goutte, Sabrina Tartu, Børge Moe, Olivier Chastel
{"title":"在海鸟身上验证了“丰富中心假说”:越冬区中心较高的能量消耗并不会降低繁殖成功率","authors":"Don-Jean Léandri-Breton, Kyle H. Elliott, Arnaud Tarroux, Pierre Legagneux, William Jouanneau, Françoise Amélineau, Frédéric Angelier, Pierre Blévin, Vegard Sandøy Bråthen, Per Fauchald, Geir W. Gabrielsen, Aurélie Goutte, Sabrina Tartu, Børge Moe, Olivier Chastel","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding variation in animal distributions is a central and challenging question in ecology that has become particularly critical in the context of global environmental changes. While distributions are often studied for resident or breeding species, species range limits are equally important for migratory species in winter when population regulation may occur due to limited resources in the non-breeding season. A central hypothesis in several theories is that the density, fitness and performance of individuals decrease towards the edge of the range as organisms become maladapted when approaching the limit of their environmental tolerance (‘abundant centre hypothesis'). Energy is a critical resource, especially in winter when environmental conditions deteriorate, and this hypothesis predicts that high energy expenditure (low performance) at the range limit would lead to rapidly dwindling body mass and reduced fitness. We investigated this hypothesis in an Arctic-breeding seabird wintering in the North Atlantic, the black-legged kittiwake <i>Rissa tridactyla</i>. From 2008 to 2019, we tracked 117 adult kittiwakes (n = 176 tracks) with geolocation devices and saltwater immersion sensors to estimate the migratory strategies, time–activity budget and energy expenditure of individuals during winter, and estimated their reproductive success after their return to the colony during summer. Population density was indeed higher towards the centre of the range. However, contrary to the predictions, the energy expenditure of individuals was higher at the centre of the range and decreased towards the edge. In contrast, there were no spatial differences in the reproductive success of individuals wintering at the centre versus at the edge of their range. We conclude that performance and fitness did not increase towards the centre of the wintering range, implying that although resource acquisition was likely higher at the abundant centre, energy expenditure was also higher, so that individual fitness was constant across the winter range.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"85 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the abundant centre hypothesis in a seabird: higher energy expenditure at the wintering range centre does not reduce reproductive success\",\"authors\":\"Don-Jean Léandri-Breton, Kyle H. Elliott, Arnaud Tarroux, Pierre Legagneux, William Jouanneau, Françoise Amélineau, Frédéric Angelier, Pierre Blévin, Vegard Sandøy Bråthen, Per Fauchald, Geir W. Gabrielsen, Aurélie Goutte, Sabrina Tartu, Børge Moe, Olivier Chastel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecog.07498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding variation in animal distributions is a central and challenging question in ecology that has become particularly critical in the context of global environmental changes. While distributions are often studied for resident or breeding species, species range limits are equally important for migratory species in winter when population regulation may occur due to limited resources in the non-breeding season. A central hypothesis in several theories is that the density, fitness and performance of individuals decrease towards the edge of the range as organisms become maladapted when approaching the limit of their environmental tolerance (‘abundant centre hypothesis'). Energy is a critical resource, especially in winter when environmental conditions deteriorate, and this hypothesis predicts that high energy expenditure (low performance) at the range limit would lead to rapidly dwindling body mass and reduced fitness. We investigated this hypothesis in an Arctic-breeding seabird wintering in the North Atlantic, the black-legged kittiwake <i>Rissa tridactyla</i>. From 2008 to 2019, we tracked 117 adult kittiwakes (n = 176 tracks) with geolocation devices and saltwater immersion sensors to estimate the migratory strategies, time–activity budget and energy expenditure of individuals during winter, and estimated their reproductive success after their return to the colony during summer. Population density was indeed higher towards the centre of the range. However, contrary to the predictions, the energy expenditure of individuals was higher at the centre of the range and decreased towards the edge. In contrast, there were no spatial differences in the reproductive success of individuals wintering at the centre versus at the edge of their range. We conclude that performance and fitness did not increase towards the centre of the wintering range, implying that although resource acquisition was likely higher at the abundant centre, energy expenditure was also higher, so that individual fitness was constant across the winter range.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"85 5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07498\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07498","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testing the abundant centre hypothesis in a seabird: higher energy expenditure at the wintering range centre does not reduce reproductive success
Understanding variation in animal distributions is a central and challenging question in ecology that has become particularly critical in the context of global environmental changes. While distributions are often studied for resident or breeding species, species range limits are equally important for migratory species in winter when population regulation may occur due to limited resources in the non-breeding season. A central hypothesis in several theories is that the density, fitness and performance of individuals decrease towards the edge of the range as organisms become maladapted when approaching the limit of their environmental tolerance (‘abundant centre hypothesis'). Energy is a critical resource, especially in winter when environmental conditions deteriorate, and this hypothesis predicts that high energy expenditure (low performance) at the range limit would lead to rapidly dwindling body mass and reduced fitness. We investigated this hypothesis in an Arctic-breeding seabird wintering in the North Atlantic, the black-legged kittiwake Rissa tridactyla. From 2008 to 2019, we tracked 117 adult kittiwakes (n = 176 tracks) with geolocation devices and saltwater immersion sensors to estimate the migratory strategies, time–activity budget and energy expenditure of individuals during winter, and estimated their reproductive success after their return to the colony during summer. Population density was indeed higher towards the centre of the range. However, contrary to the predictions, the energy expenditure of individuals was higher at the centre of the range and decreased towards the edge. In contrast, there were no spatial differences in the reproductive success of individuals wintering at the centre versus at the edge of their range. We conclude that performance and fitness did not increase towards the centre of the wintering range, implying that although resource acquisition was likely higher at the abundant centre, energy expenditure was also higher, so that individual fitness was constant across the winter range.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.