美国新的心脏后肾分配政策:谁将从抢救肾中受益?

Alice L Zhou,Armaan F Akbar,Alexandra A Rizaldi,Jessica M Ruck,Emily L Larson,Sorush Rokui,Dane C Paneitz,Elizabeth A King,Ahmet Kilic
{"title":"美国新的心脏后肾分配政策:谁将从抢救肾中受益?","authors":"Alice L Zhou,Armaan F Akbar,Alexandra A Rizaldi,Jessica M Ruck,Emily L Larson,Sorush Rokui,Dane C Paneitz,Elizabeth A King,Ahmet Kilic","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThe new rescue kidney policy in the United States was implemented in June 2023. To estimate its potential impact, we investigated a historic cohort of heart transplant (HT) recipients who would have been eligible for a kidney-after-heart transplant under this policy.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAdult heart-only recipients from 1/1/2000 to 3/31/2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized by retroactively applying eligibility criteria from the new policy: eGFR≤20mL/min, CrCl≤20mL/min, or dialysis 60-365 days post-HT. We evaluated outcomes of eligible recipients.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 45,833 HT recipients, 840 (1.8%) were eligible for a rescue kidney. Eligible recipients had higher median age (58 vs. 56 years, p<0.001) and serum creatinine (1.4 vs. 1.2, p<0.001), and were more likely to be status 1A in the pre-2018 allocation era (63.4% vs. 51.9%, p<0.001) and status 1 in the post-2018 allocation era (13.9% vs. 9.1%, p=0.003). Survival at 1 year conditional on 60-day survival was worse for eligible recipients (50.8% vs. 96.3%; HR 17.6 [95%CI: 15.8-19.6], p<0.001). Post-HT, 607 (72.3%) eligible recipients were never listed for kidney transplant (KT), of whom 486 (80.1%) died with a median time-to-death of 8.8 months. Among the 233 (27.7%) recipients listed for KT, 65 (27.9%) died/deteriorated on the waitlist and 99 (42.5%) received a KT (median 38.4 months post-HT).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nHalf of recipients eligible for a rescue kidney did not survive to 1 year post-HT, and >70% were never listed for KT. The effects of the new policy on mitigating mortality in this challenging population will be paramount.","PeriodicalId":22654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Kidney-After-Heart Allocation Policy in the United States: Who would benefit from a rescue kidney?\",\"authors\":\"Alice L Zhou,Armaan F Akbar,Alexandra A Rizaldi,Jessica M Ruck,Emily L Larson,Sorush Rokui,Dane C Paneitz,Elizabeth A King,Ahmet Kilic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nThe new rescue kidney policy in the United States was implemented in June 2023. To estimate its potential impact, we investigated a historic cohort of heart transplant (HT) recipients who would have been eligible for a kidney-after-heart transplant under this policy.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nAdult heart-only recipients from 1/1/2000 to 3/31/2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized by retroactively applying eligibility criteria from the new policy: eGFR≤20mL/min, CrCl≤20mL/min, or dialysis 60-365 days post-HT. We evaluated outcomes of eligible recipients.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 45,833 HT recipients, 840 (1.8%) were eligible for a rescue kidney. Eligible recipients had higher median age (58 vs. 56 years, p<0.001) and serum creatinine (1.4 vs. 1.2, p<0.001), and were more likely to be status 1A in the pre-2018 allocation era (63.4% vs. 51.9%, p<0.001) and status 1 in the post-2018 allocation era (13.9% vs. 9.1%, p=0.003). Survival at 1 year conditional on 60-day survival was worse for eligible recipients (50.8% vs. 96.3%; HR 17.6 [95%CI: 15.8-19.6], p<0.001). Post-HT, 607 (72.3%) eligible recipients were never listed for kidney transplant (KT), of whom 486 (80.1%) died with a median time-to-death of 8.8 months. Among the 233 (27.7%) recipients listed for KT, 65 (27.9%) died/deteriorated on the waitlist and 99 (42.5%) received a KT (median 38.4 months post-HT).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nHalf of recipients eligible for a rescue kidney did not survive to 1 year post-HT, and >70% were never listed for KT. The effects of the new policy on mitigating mortality in this challenging population will be paramount.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国新的抢救肾政策于2023年6月实施。为了评估其潜在影响,我们调查了一组历史悠久的心脏移植(HT)受者,他们在该政策下有资格进行心脏后肾移植。方法:从2000年1月1日至2023年3月31日,在美国器官共享网络数据库中,通过追溯应用新政策的资格标准进行分类:eGFR≤20mL/min, CrCl≤20mL/min,或ht后60-365天透析。我们评估了符合条件的接受者的结果。结果45,833名HT受者中,840名(1.8%)符合救援肾的条件。符合条件的接受者的中位年龄较高(58岁vs 56岁),其中70%从未列入KT。新政策对降低这一具有挑战性的人口的死亡率的影响将是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Kidney-After-Heart Allocation Policy in the United States: Who would benefit from a rescue kidney?
PURPOSE The new rescue kidney policy in the United States was implemented in June 2023. To estimate its potential impact, we investigated a historic cohort of heart transplant (HT) recipients who would have been eligible for a kidney-after-heart transplant under this policy. METHODS Adult heart-only recipients from 1/1/2000 to 3/31/2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized by retroactively applying eligibility criteria from the new policy: eGFR≤20mL/min, CrCl≤20mL/min, or dialysis 60-365 days post-HT. We evaluated outcomes of eligible recipients. RESULTS Of 45,833 HT recipients, 840 (1.8%) were eligible for a rescue kidney. Eligible recipients had higher median age (58 vs. 56 years, p<0.001) and serum creatinine (1.4 vs. 1.2, p<0.001), and were more likely to be status 1A in the pre-2018 allocation era (63.4% vs. 51.9%, p<0.001) and status 1 in the post-2018 allocation era (13.9% vs. 9.1%, p=0.003). Survival at 1 year conditional on 60-day survival was worse for eligible recipients (50.8% vs. 96.3%; HR 17.6 [95%CI: 15.8-19.6], p<0.001). Post-HT, 607 (72.3%) eligible recipients were never listed for kidney transplant (KT), of whom 486 (80.1%) died with a median time-to-death of 8.8 months. Among the 233 (27.7%) recipients listed for KT, 65 (27.9%) died/deteriorated on the waitlist and 99 (42.5%) received a KT (median 38.4 months post-HT). CONCLUSIONS Half of recipients eligible for a rescue kidney did not survive to 1 year post-HT, and >70% were never listed for KT. The effects of the new policy on mitigating mortality in this challenging population will be paramount.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thoraco Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Lung Transplantation - Is it a Safe Match? The ACTION VAD Registry: A Collective Five-Year Experience. Improving Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock: A Focus on Reducing Complications. New Kidney-After-Heart Allocation Policy in the United States: Who would benefit from a rescue kidney? What We Know We Don't Know: The Johari Window in DCD Heart Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1