抗肥胖药物对超重或肥胖人群减肥、心脏代谢和心理结果的安全性和影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103020
Leiling Liu, Zhiqi Li, Wenrui Ye, Pu Peng, Yurong Wang, Luqing Wan, Jiangnan Li, Mei Zhang, Yihua Wang, Runqi Liu, Danyan Xu, Jingjing Zhang
{"title":"抗肥胖药物对超重或肥胖人群减肥、心脏代谢和心理结果的安全性和影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Leiling Liu, Zhiqi Li, Wenrui Ye, Pu Peng, Yurong Wang, Luqing Wan, Jiangnan Li, Mei Zhang, Yihua Wang, Runqi Liu, Danyan Xu, Jingjing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overweight and obesity pose serious health challenges for individuals and societies. This study aims to facilitate personalised treatment of obesity by summarising recent research on weight-loss pharmacotherapies, with a focus on their effects on weight reduction, cardiometabolic health, psychological outcomes, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis included searches of Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to June 8, 2024. Randomised controlled trials evaluating weight-loss pharmacotherapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treating overweight or obesity were included. Primary outcomes included changes in body weight, cardiometabolic indicators, psychological outcomes, and adverse events. Summary data was extracted from published reports. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs), risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the certainty of evidence for each pooled analysis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024547905.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 154 randomised controlled trials (n = 112,515 participants) were included. Tirzepatide had the greatest weight-loss effect (WMD -11.69, 95% CI -19.22 to -4.15; <i>P</i> = 0.0024; I<sup>2</sup> = 100.0%; moderate certainty), followed by semaglutide (-8.48, -12.68 to -4.27; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 100.0%; moderate certainty). Tirzepatide had the strongest antihypertensive effect on both systolic (WMD -5.74, -9.00 to -2.48; <i>P</i> = 0.0006; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.8%; moderate certainty) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD -2.91, -4.97 to -0.85; <i>P</i> = 0.0056; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.8%; moderate certainty) and best reduced triglycerides (WMD -0.77, -0.85 to -0.69; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 3.2%; high certainty), fasting glucose (WMD -3.06, -5.53 to -0.59; <i>P</i> = 0.015; I<sup>2</sup> = 100.0%; moderate certainty), insulin (WMD -4.91, -8.15 to -1.68; <i>P</i> = 0.0029; I<sup>2</sup> = 97.0%; moderate certainty), and glycated haemoglobin levels (WMD -1.27, -1.82 to -0.73; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 100.0%; moderate certainty). Semaglutide (RR 0.83, 0.74-0.92; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty) and liraglutide (0.87, 0.79-0.96; <i>P</i> = 0.0059; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty) reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, all three medications were associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects. Naltrexone/bupropion increased the risk of elevated blood pressure (RR 1.72, 1.04-2.85; <i>P</i> = 0.036; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty). Topiramate increased depression risk (RR 1.62, 1.14 to 2.30; <i>P</i> = 0.0077; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty), and phentermine/topiramate raised concerns about anxiety (RR 1.91, 1.09 to 3.35; <i>P</i> = 0.025; I<sup>2</sup> = 29.5%; high certainty), sleep disorders (RR 1.55, 1.24-1.93; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty), and irritability (RR 3.31, 1.69-6.47; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty). No medication increased the risk of serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>For weight reduction, tirzepatide is the top choice, followed by semaglutide. Considering cardiometabolic risk factors, tirzepatide shows the best blood pressure- and glucose-lowering benefits, while semaglutide and liraglutide reduce the risk of MACEs. Naltrexone/bupropion carries a risk of increased blood pressure. Phentermine/topiramate should be used with caution due to its higher risk of psychological side effects. Despite limitations related to study heterogeneity, these findings provide valuable insights for weight management strategies across diverse individuals.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Natural Science Foundation of China, Leading Talents Program of Hunan Province, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"79 ","pages":"103020"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and effects of anti-obesity medications on weight loss, cardiometabolic, and psychological outcomes in people living with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Leiling Liu, Zhiqi Li, Wenrui Ye, Pu Peng, Yurong Wang, Luqing Wan, Jiangnan Li, Mei Zhang, Yihua Wang, Runqi Liu, Danyan Xu, Jingjing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overweight and obesity pose serious health challenges for individuals and societies. This study aims to facilitate personalised treatment of obesity by summarising recent research on weight-loss pharmacotherapies, with a focus on their effects on weight reduction, cardiometabolic health, psychological outcomes, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis included searches of Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to June 8, 2024. Randomised controlled trials evaluating weight-loss pharmacotherapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treating overweight or obesity were included. Primary outcomes included changes in body weight, cardiometabolic indicators, psychological outcomes, and adverse events. Summary data was extracted from published reports. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs), risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the certainty of evidence for each pooled analysis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024547905.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 154 randomised controlled trials (n = 112,515 participants) were included. Tirzepatide had the greatest weight-loss effect (WMD -11.69, 95% CI -19.22 to -4.15; <i>P</i> = 0.0024; I<sup>2</sup> = 100.0%; moderate certainty), followed by semaglutide (-8.48, -12.68 to -4.27; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 100.0%; moderate certainty). Tirzepatide had the strongest antihypertensive effect on both systolic (WMD -5.74, -9.00 to -2.48; <i>P</i> = 0.0006; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.8%; moderate certainty) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD -2.91, -4.97 to -0.85; <i>P</i> = 0.0056; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.8%; moderate certainty) and best reduced triglycerides (WMD -0.77, -0.85 to -0.69; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 3.2%; high certainty), fasting glucose (WMD -3.06, -5.53 to -0.59; <i>P</i> = 0.015; I<sup>2</sup> = 100.0%; moderate certainty), insulin (WMD -4.91, -8.15 to -1.68; <i>P</i> = 0.0029; I<sup>2</sup> = 97.0%; moderate certainty), and glycated haemoglobin levels (WMD -1.27, -1.82 to -0.73; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 100.0%; moderate certainty). Semaglutide (RR 0.83, 0.74-0.92; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty) and liraglutide (0.87, 0.79-0.96; <i>P</i> = 0.0059; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty) reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, all three medications were associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects. Naltrexone/bupropion increased the risk of elevated blood pressure (RR 1.72, 1.04-2.85; <i>P</i> = 0.036; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty). Topiramate increased depression risk (RR 1.62, 1.14 to 2.30; <i>P</i> = 0.0077; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty), and phentermine/topiramate raised concerns about anxiety (RR 1.91, 1.09 to 3.35; <i>P</i> = 0.025; I<sup>2</sup> = 29.5%; high certainty), sleep disorders (RR 1.55, 1.24-1.93; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty), and irritability (RR 3.31, 1.69-6.47; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; high certainty). No medication increased the risk of serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>For weight reduction, tirzepatide is the top choice, followed by semaglutide. Considering cardiometabolic risk factors, tirzepatide shows the best blood pressure- and glucose-lowering benefits, while semaglutide and liraglutide reduce the risk of MACEs. Naltrexone/bupropion carries a risk of increased blood pressure. Phentermine/topiramate should be used with caution due to its higher risk of psychological side effects. Despite limitations related to study heterogeneity, these findings provide valuable insights for weight management strategies across diverse individuals.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Natural Science Foundation of China, Leading Talents Program of Hunan Province, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"103020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超重和肥胖对个人和社会构成严重的健康挑战。本研究旨在通过总结减肥药物疗法的最新研究,促进肥胖的个性化治疗,重点关注它们对减肥、心脏代谢健康、心理结果和不良事件的影响。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析包括Web of Science、PubMed和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials从成立到2024年6月8日的检索。评估减肥药物疗法的随机对照试验被食品和药物管理局(FDA)或欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准用于治疗超重或肥胖。主要结局包括体重、心脏代谢指标、心理结局和不良事件的变化。摘要数据摘自已发表的报告。随机效应荟萃分析用于计算加权平均差异(wmd)、风险比(rr)和95%置信区间(CI)。建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)系统用于评估每个汇总分析证据的确定性。普洛斯彼罗注册:CRD42024547905。研究结果:共纳入154项随机对照试验(n = 112,515名受试者)。替西帕肽的减肥效果最好(WMD为-11.69,95% CI为-19.22 ~ -4.15;p = 0.0024;i2 = 100.0%;中度确定性),其次是西马鲁肽(-8.48,-12.68至-4.27;P < 0.0001;i2 = 100.0%;温和的确定性)。替西帕肽的降压效果最强(WMD为-5.74,-9.00 ~ -2.48;p = 0.0006;i2 = 99.8%;中度确定性)和舒张压(WMD -2.91, -4.97至-0.85;p = 0.0056;i2 = 99.8%;中等确定性)和最佳降低甘油三酯(WMD -0.77, -0.85至-0.69;P < 0.0001;i2 = 3.2%;高确定性),空腹血糖(WMD -3.06, -5.53至-0.59;p = 0.015;i2 = 100.0%;中度确定性),胰岛素(WMD -4.91, -8.15至-1.68;p = 0.0029;i2 = 97.0%;中度确定性)和糖化血红蛋白水平(WMD为-1.27,-1.82至-0.73;P < 0.0001;i2 = 100.0%;温和的确定性)。Semaglutide (RR 0.83, 0.74-0.92;P < 0.0001;i2 = 0.0%;高确定性)和利拉鲁肽(0.87,0.79-0.96;p = 0.0059;i2 = 0.0%;高确定性)降低了主要不良心血管事件(mace)的风险。然而,这三种药物都与胃肠道不良反应有关。纳曲酮/安非他酮增加血压升高的风险(RR 1.72, 1.04-2.85;p = 0.036;i2 = 0.0%;高确定性)。托吡酯增加抑郁风险(RR 1.62, 1.14 ~ 2.30;p = 0.0077;i2 = 0.0%;高确定性),芬特明/托吡酯增加了对焦虑的担忧(RR 1.91, 1.09至3.35;p = 0.025;i2 = 29.5%;高确定性)、睡眠障碍(RR 1.55, 1.24-1.93;P < 0.0001;i2 = 0.0%;高确定性)和易怒(RR 3.31, 1.69-6.47;P < 0.0001;i2 = 0.0%;高确定性)。没有药物增加严重不良事件的风险。解释:对于减肥,替西帕肽是首选,其次是西马鲁肽。考虑到心脏代谢危险因素,替西帕肽显示出最好的降压和降糖效果,而西马鲁肽和利拉鲁肽降低mace的风险。纳曲酮/安非他酮有血压升高的风险。芬特明/托吡酯应谨慎使用,因为其心理副作用的风险较高。尽管研究异质性存在局限性,但这些发现为不同个体的体重管理策略提供了有价值的见解。项目资助:国家自然科学基金、湖南省领军人才计划、中南大学中央大学基本科研业务费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and effects of anti-obesity medications on weight loss, cardiometabolic, and psychological outcomes in people living with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Overweight and obesity pose serious health challenges for individuals and societies. This study aims to facilitate personalised treatment of obesity by summarising recent research on weight-loss pharmacotherapies, with a focus on their effects on weight reduction, cardiometabolic health, psychological outcomes, and adverse events.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included searches of Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to June 8, 2024. Randomised controlled trials evaluating weight-loss pharmacotherapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treating overweight or obesity were included. Primary outcomes included changes in body weight, cardiometabolic indicators, psychological outcomes, and adverse events. Summary data was extracted from published reports. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs), risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the certainty of evidence for each pooled analysis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024547905.

Findings: A total of 154 randomised controlled trials (n = 112,515 participants) were included. Tirzepatide had the greatest weight-loss effect (WMD -11.69, 95% CI -19.22 to -4.15; P = 0.0024; I2 = 100.0%; moderate certainty), followed by semaglutide (-8.48, -12.68 to -4.27; P < 0.0001; I2 = 100.0%; moderate certainty). Tirzepatide had the strongest antihypertensive effect on both systolic (WMD -5.74, -9.00 to -2.48; P = 0.0006; I2 = 99.8%; moderate certainty) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD -2.91, -4.97 to -0.85; P = 0.0056; I2 = 99.8%; moderate certainty) and best reduced triglycerides (WMD -0.77, -0.85 to -0.69; P < 0.0001; I2 = 3.2%; high certainty), fasting glucose (WMD -3.06, -5.53 to -0.59; P = 0.015; I2 = 100.0%; moderate certainty), insulin (WMD -4.91, -8.15 to -1.68; P = 0.0029; I2 = 97.0%; moderate certainty), and glycated haemoglobin levels (WMD -1.27, -1.82 to -0.73; P < 0.0001; I2 = 100.0%; moderate certainty). Semaglutide (RR 0.83, 0.74-0.92; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty) and liraglutide (0.87, 0.79-0.96; P = 0.0059; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty) reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, all three medications were associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects. Naltrexone/bupropion increased the risk of elevated blood pressure (RR 1.72, 1.04-2.85; P = 0.036; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty). Topiramate increased depression risk (RR 1.62, 1.14 to 2.30; P = 0.0077; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty), and phentermine/topiramate raised concerns about anxiety (RR 1.91, 1.09 to 3.35; P = 0.025; I2 = 29.5%; high certainty), sleep disorders (RR 1.55, 1.24-1.93; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty), and irritability (RR 3.31, 1.69-6.47; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty). No medication increased the risk of serious adverse events.

Interpretation: For weight reduction, tirzepatide is the top choice, followed by semaglutide. Considering cardiometabolic risk factors, tirzepatide shows the best blood pressure- and glucose-lowering benefits, while semaglutide and liraglutide reduce the risk of MACEs. Naltrexone/bupropion carries a risk of increased blood pressure. Phentermine/topiramate should be used with caution due to its higher risk of psychological side effects. Despite limitations related to study heterogeneity, these findings provide valuable insights for weight management strategies across diverse individuals.

Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China, Leading Talents Program of Hunan Province, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Global, regional, national burden of asthma from 1990 to 2021, with projections of incidence to 2050: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. Alcohol use and HIV suppression after completion of financial incentives for alcohol abstinence and isoniazid adherence: a randomized controlled trial. Expression of concern-Effectiveness of strategies for implementing guideline-concordant care in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. O' testosterone, where is thy sting? A Urologist's reflection on testosterone and prostate cancer. Preoperative and intraoperative neuromonitoring and mapping techniques impact oncological and functional outcomes in supratentorial function-eloquent brain tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1