Brian J Johnson, Katie E Jung, Megan A MacKenzie, Abdulsalam Bah, Nathalie Jetté, Nihal Mohamed, Leah J Blank
{"title":"新诊断癫痫患者首次抗癫痫药物处方与健康社会决定因素的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Brian J Johnson, Katie E Jung, Megan A MacKenzie, Abdulsalam Bah, Nathalie Jetté, Nihal Mohamed, Leah J Blank","doi":"10.1111/epi.18277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether social determinants of health (SDOHs) are associated with the first antiseizure medication (ASM) prescribed for newly diagnosed epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards were followed, and the protocol registered (CRD42023448998). Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched up to July 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened studies and reached mutual consensus for inclusion. Studies reporting the first ASM prescribed for patients with new epilepsy in all age groups, countries, and languages were eligible for inclusion. Review articles, conference abstracts, and studies with fewer than 15 participants were not eligible for inclusion. Studies were meta-analyzed using fixed-effects models. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (total participants = 380,785) contained SDOH data and their association with the first ASM prescription after epilepsy diagnosis. Meta-analysis of studies with compatible data revealed that Black (pooled odds ratio [OR] .94, 95% confidence interval [CI] .90-.98) and Hispanic (pooled OR .89, 95% CI .82-.97) patients with U.S. Medicare/Medicaid had a lower odds of receiving a newer ASM compared to White patients. Three studies revealed that rural epilepsy patients had a lower odds of receiving new ASMs compared to urban patients (pooled OR .84, 95% CI .80-.89). The relationship between income levels and ASM prescription patterns differed across countries, highlighting inconsistencies that warrant further investigation. Among studies identified for inclusion, relatively few had combinable data, thereby limiting the scope of our meta-analysis to two SDOHs.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Significant disparities exist in first-line ASM prescription for non-White and rural persons with epilepsy. There exist few data on other SDOHs including gender identity and socioeconomic background. Future work leveraging large data sets may reveal additional ASM prescription inequities. Developing care pathways to rectify known prescribing disparities may improve health equity among PWE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of social determinants of health with first antiseizure medication prescription for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Brian J Johnson, Katie E Jung, Megan A MacKenzie, Abdulsalam Bah, Nathalie Jetté, Nihal Mohamed, Leah J Blank\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether social determinants of health (SDOHs) are associated with the first antiseizure medication (ASM) prescribed for newly diagnosed epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards were followed, and the protocol registered (CRD42023448998). Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched up to July 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened studies and reached mutual consensus for inclusion. Studies reporting the first ASM prescribed for patients with new epilepsy in all age groups, countries, and languages were eligible for inclusion. Review articles, conference abstracts, and studies with fewer than 15 participants were not eligible for inclusion. Studies were meta-analyzed using fixed-effects models. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (total participants = 380,785) contained SDOH data and their association with the first ASM prescription after epilepsy diagnosis. Meta-analysis of studies with compatible data revealed that Black (pooled odds ratio [OR] .94, 95% confidence interval [CI] .90-.98) and Hispanic (pooled OR .89, 95% CI .82-.97) patients with U.S. Medicare/Medicaid had a lower odds of receiving a newer ASM compared to White patients. Three studies revealed that rural epilepsy patients had a lower odds of receiving new ASMs compared to urban patients (pooled OR .84, 95% CI .80-.89). The relationship between income levels and ASM prescription patterns differed across countries, highlighting inconsistencies that warrant further investigation. Among studies identified for inclusion, relatively few had combinable data, thereby limiting the scope of our meta-analysis to two SDOHs.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Significant disparities exist in first-line ASM prescription for non-White and rural persons with epilepsy. There exist few data on other SDOHs including gender identity and socioeconomic background. Future work leveraging large data sets may reveal additional ASM prescription inequities. Developing care pathways to rectify known prescribing disparities may improve health equity among PWE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18277\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18277","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估健康社会决定因素(SDOHs)是否与新诊断癫痫患者首次服用抗癫痫药物(ASM)有关。方法:遵循系统评价和meta分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准,注册方案(CRD42023448998)。Embase, Medline和Web of Science被搜索到2023年7月31日。两位审稿人独立筛选研究并就纳入达成共识。报告所有年龄组、国家和语言的新发癫痫患者首次使用ASM的研究符合纳入条件。综述文章、会议摘要和少于15人的研究不符合入选条件。使用固定效应模型对研究进行meta分析。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估。结果:13项研究(总参与者= 380,785)包含SDOH数据及其与癫痫诊断后首次ASM处方的关系。具有相容数据的研究荟萃分析显示,与白人患者相比,接受美国医疗保险/医疗补助的黑人患者(合并优势比[OR] .94, 95%可信区间[CI] .90- 0.98)和西班牙裔患者(合并优势比[OR] .89, 95% CI .82- 0.97)接受新ASM的几率更低。三项研究显示,与城市患者相比,农村癫痫患者接受新asm的几率较低(合并OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.80 - 0.89)。收入水平与ASM处方模式之间的关系因国家而异,突出了需要进一步调查的不一致性。在确定纳入的研究中,相对较少的研究具有可合并的数据,因此将我们的meta分析范围限制在两个sdoh。意义:非白人和农村癫痫患者的一线ASM处方存在显著差异。关于性别认同和社会经济背景等其他SDOHs的数据很少。利用大型数据集的未来工作可能会揭示更多的ASM处方不平等。发展护理途径以纠正已知的处方差异可能会改善PWE之间的健康公平。
Association of social determinants of health with first antiseizure medication prescription for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: To assess whether social determinants of health (SDOHs) are associated with the first antiseizure medication (ASM) prescribed for newly diagnosed epilepsy.
Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards were followed, and the protocol registered (CRD42023448998). Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched up to July 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened studies and reached mutual consensus for inclusion. Studies reporting the first ASM prescribed for patients with new epilepsy in all age groups, countries, and languages were eligible for inclusion. Review articles, conference abstracts, and studies with fewer than 15 participants were not eligible for inclusion. Studies were meta-analyzed using fixed-effects models. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Results: Thirteen studies (total participants = 380,785) contained SDOH data and their association with the first ASM prescription after epilepsy diagnosis. Meta-analysis of studies with compatible data revealed that Black (pooled odds ratio [OR] .94, 95% confidence interval [CI] .90-.98) and Hispanic (pooled OR .89, 95% CI .82-.97) patients with U.S. Medicare/Medicaid had a lower odds of receiving a newer ASM compared to White patients. Three studies revealed that rural epilepsy patients had a lower odds of receiving new ASMs compared to urban patients (pooled OR .84, 95% CI .80-.89). The relationship between income levels and ASM prescription patterns differed across countries, highlighting inconsistencies that warrant further investigation. Among studies identified for inclusion, relatively few had combinable data, thereby limiting the scope of our meta-analysis to two SDOHs.
Significance: Significant disparities exist in first-line ASM prescription for non-White and rural persons with epilepsy. There exist few data on other SDOHs including gender identity and socioeconomic background. Future work leveraging large data sets may reveal additional ASM prescription inequities. Developing care pathways to rectify known prescribing disparities may improve health equity among PWE.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.