嗜酸性肉芽肿伴多血管炎:生物制剂和鼻窦手术治疗鼻息肉病的真实世界研究。

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1002/alr.23536
Nitish Kumar, Savannah D Jett, Pedro Lança Gomes, Michael J Marino, Amar Miglani, Devyani Lal
{"title":"嗜酸性肉芽肿伴多血管炎:生物制剂和鼻窦手术治疗鼻息肉病的真实世界研究。","authors":"Nitish Kumar, Savannah D Jett, Pedro Lança Gomes, Michael J Marino, Amar Miglani, Devyani Lal","doi":"10.1002/alr.23536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a multisystemic disease associated with nasal polyposis. Multiple biologics are used for managing EGPA, including some approved for nasal polyps (NP). This study investigated real-world biologic prescription patterns for EGPA and their impact on NP and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EGPA patients with NP treated with a biologic at any Mayo Clinic site (January 2010 to January 2024) were identified by querying the unified electronic medical record. Patterns of biologic therapy, clinical course, impact on NP, and performance of ESS were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients were identified. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients underwent ESS, with 62 of 80 (77.5%) undergoing 131 ESS procedures prior to biologic therapy. ESS for recalcitrant NP (47 episodes) was performed on 38 of 80 (47.5%) patients on biologics. Biologic monotherapy was used in 90% (72) of patients; mepolizumab (81.9%) was the most common, followed by rituximab (23.6%), benralizumab (18.1%), and dupilumab (12.5%). Switching of biologics was observed in 28 of 80 patients. Concurrent dual-biologic therapy was used in eight (10%) patients. For patients on single-agent biologic therapy, ESS was performed on 52.5% of patients on mepolizumab, 23.5% on rituximab, 42.8% on benralizumab, and 22.2% on dupilumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary multi-modality treatment with biologics and ESS appeared to be the mainstay of controlling NP in EGPA. Mepolizumab was the most frequently used biologic. Dual biologic therapy was necessary in 10% of patients. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients had ESS, with almost half the study population (47.5%) undergoing ESS after initiating biologic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A Real-World Study of Biologics and Sinus Surgery Use for Managing Nasal Polyposis.\",\"authors\":\"Nitish Kumar, Savannah D Jett, Pedro Lança Gomes, Michael J Marino, Amar Miglani, Devyani Lal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alr.23536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a multisystemic disease associated with nasal polyposis. Multiple biologics are used for managing EGPA, including some approved for nasal polyps (NP). This study investigated real-world biologic prescription patterns for EGPA and their impact on NP and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EGPA patients with NP treated with a biologic at any Mayo Clinic site (January 2010 to January 2024) were identified by querying the unified electronic medical record. Patterns of biologic therapy, clinical course, impact on NP, and performance of ESS were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients were identified. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients underwent ESS, with 62 of 80 (77.5%) undergoing 131 ESS procedures prior to biologic therapy. ESS for recalcitrant NP (47 episodes) was performed on 38 of 80 (47.5%) patients on biologics. Biologic monotherapy was used in 90% (72) of patients; mepolizumab (81.9%) was the most common, followed by rituximab (23.6%), benralizumab (18.1%), and dupilumab (12.5%). Switching of biologics was observed in 28 of 80 patients. Concurrent dual-biologic therapy was used in eight (10%) patients. For patients on single-agent biologic therapy, ESS was performed on 52.5% of patients on mepolizumab, 23.5% on rituximab, 42.8% on benralizumab, and 22.2% on dupilumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary multi-modality treatment with biologics and ESS appeared to be the mainstay of controlling NP in EGPA. Mepolizumab was the most frequently used biologic. Dual biologic therapy was necessary in 10% of patients. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients had ESS, with almost half the study population (47.5%) undergoing ESS after initiating biologic treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23536\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:嗜酸性肉芽肿病合并多血管炎(EGPA)是一种与鼻息肉病相关的多系统疾病。多种生物制剂用于治疗EGPA,包括一些批准用于鼻息肉(NP)的生物制剂。本研究调查了真实世界EGPA的生物处方模式及其对NP和内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)使用的影响。方法:通过查询统一的电子病历,对2010年1月至2024年1月在梅奥诊所任一地点接受生物制剂治疗的EGPA NP患者进行识别。研究生物治疗模式、临床病程、对NP的影响及ESS的表现。结果:共发现80例患者。总体而言,80例患者中有71例(88.75%)接受了ESS治疗,80例患者中有62例(77.5%)在生物治疗前接受了131例ESS治疗。对于顽固性NP(47次发作),80例使用生物制剂的患者中有38例(47.5%)接受了ESS治疗。90%(72)的患者采用生物单药治疗;Mepolizumab(81.9%)最为常见,其次是利妥昔单抗(23.6%)、贝那利单抗(18.1%)和杜匹单抗(12.5%)。80例患者中有28例出现生物制剂切换。8例(10%)患者同时使用双生物治疗。在接受单药生物治疗的患者中,52.5%的美波珠单抗患者、23.5%的利妥昔单抗患者、42.8%的贝那利单抗患者和22.2%的杜匹单抗患者接受了ESS治疗。结论:生物制剂和ESS的多学科多模式治疗似乎是控制EGPA NP的主要手段。Mepolizumab是最常用的生物制剂。10%的患者需要双重生物治疗。总体而言,80例患者中有71例(88.75%)患有ESS,几乎一半的研究人群(47.5%)在开始生物治疗后发生了ESS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A Real-World Study of Biologics and Sinus Surgery Use for Managing Nasal Polyposis.

Background/aim: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a multisystemic disease associated with nasal polyposis. Multiple biologics are used for managing EGPA, including some approved for nasal polyps (NP). This study investigated real-world biologic prescription patterns for EGPA and their impact on NP and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) use.

Methods: EGPA patients with NP treated with a biologic at any Mayo Clinic site (January 2010 to January 2024) were identified by querying the unified electronic medical record. Patterns of biologic therapy, clinical course, impact on NP, and performance of ESS were studied.

Results: Eighty patients were identified. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients underwent ESS, with 62 of 80 (77.5%) undergoing 131 ESS procedures prior to biologic therapy. ESS for recalcitrant NP (47 episodes) was performed on 38 of 80 (47.5%) patients on biologics. Biologic monotherapy was used in 90% (72) of patients; mepolizumab (81.9%) was the most common, followed by rituximab (23.6%), benralizumab (18.1%), and dupilumab (12.5%). Switching of biologics was observed in 28 of 80 patients. Concurrent dual-biologic therapy was used in eight (10%) patients. For patients on single-agent biologic therapy, ESS was performed on 52.5% of patients on mepolizumab, 23.5% on rituximab, 42.8% on benralizumab, and 22.2% on dupilumab.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary multi-modality treatment with biologics and ESS appeared to be the mainstay of controlling NP in EGPA. Mepolizumab was the most frequently used biologic. Dual biologic therapy was necessary in 10% of patients. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients had ESS, with almost half the study population (47.5%) undergoing ESS after initiating biologic treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
期刊最新文献
Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A Real-World Study of Biologics and Sinus Surgery Use for Managing Nasal Polyposis. Area Deprivation Index Is Associated With Extent of Disease at Presentation in Inverted Papilloma. Efficacy of Using Photobiomodulation Therapy in Allergic Rhinitis: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial. Persistent Eosinophilic Inflammation Is Not a Feature of Type 2 CRS Patients Failing Anti-IL-5R Therapy and Requiring Class Switching to Anti-IL-4/13. Olfactory Cleft Opacification Improves With Intranasal Steroid Treatment and Is Correlated With Objective and Patient-Reported Olfactory Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1