一个开源的,用户友好的,机器学习方法自动分割和分析周围神经横断面。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011974
Marissa Suchyta, Beth Dohrmann, Samir Mardini
{"title":"一个开源的,用户友好的,机器学习方法自动分割和分析周围神经横断面。","authors":"Marissa Suchyta, Beth Dohrmann, Samir Mardini","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quantitative neuromorphometry analysis of the peripheral nerve is paramount to nerve regeneration research. However, this technique relies upon accurate segmentation and determination of myelin and axonal area. Manual histological analysis methods are time- consuming, and subject to error and bias. We demonstrate and validate a user-friendly method relying on opensource machine-learning software and no coding knowledge.</p><p><strong>Materials methods: </strong>19 rat facial nerve segments were fixed, osmicated, embedded in epoxy, sectioned, and stained with toluidine blue. Whole nerve cross-sections were scanned at 20x. Images were pre-processed in ImageJ to measure fascicular area and remove background. Images were imported into Ilastik and the pixel classification module used to segment myelin and axons. A novel CellProfiler pipeline was used with Otsu 2-threshold processing to segment and quantify individual axon and myelin objects from segmentations. Axon counts and g-ratio of nerve samples were acquired manually and using this technique to compare between methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of an entire nerve cross-section can be completed with this method in less than 5 minutes. Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated reliability between axon counts performed manually and with this protocol. There was also no statistically significant difference in accuracy in determining g-ratio compared to manual techniques (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The protocol presented here demonstrates a novel and accurate means of segmenting and analyzing histological nerve cross-sections. This method decreases both user time and potential bias. It enables analysis of an entire nerve versus random sampling. Lastly, this protocol utilizes only opensource software freely accessible to researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An open-source, user-friendly, machine-learning method for automated segmentation and analysis of peripheral nerve cross-sections.\",\"authors\":\"Marissa Suchyta, Beth Dohrmann, Samir Mardini\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quantitative neuromorphometry analysis of the peripheral nerve is paramount to nerve regeneration research. However, this technique relies upon accurate segmentation and determination of myelin and axonal area. Manual histological analysis methods are time- consuming, and subject to error and bias. We demonstrate and validate a user-friendly method relying on opensource machine-learning software and no coding knowledge.</p><p><strong>Materials methods: </strong>19 rat facial nerve segments were fixed, osmicated, embedded in epoxy, sectioned, and stained with toluidine blue. Whole nerve cross-sections were scanned at 20x. Images were pre-processed in ImageJ to measure fascicular area and remove background. Images were imported into Ilastik and the pixel classification module used to segment myelin and axons. A novel CellProfiler pipeline was used with Otsu 2-threshold processing to segment and quantify individual axon and myelin objects from segmentations. Axon counts and g-ratio of nerve samples were acquired manually and using this technique to compare between methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of an entire nerve cross-section can be completed with this method in less than 5 minutes. Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated reliability between axon counts performed manually and with this protocol. There was also no statistically significant difference in accuracy in determining g-ratio compared to manual techniques (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The protocol presented here demonstrates a novel and accurate means of segmenting and analyzing histological nerve cross-sections. This method decreases both user time and potential bias. It enables analysis of an entire nerve versus random sampling. Lastly, this protocol utilizes only opensource software freely accessible to researchers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011974\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011974","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

末梢神经形态定量分析是神经再生研究的重要内容。然而,这种技术依赖于髓鞘和轴突区域的准确分割和测定。手工的组织学分析方法是费时的,而且容易产生误差和偏差。我们演示并验证了一种基于开源机器学习软件的用户友好方法,无需编码知识。材料方法:将19个大鼠面神经节段固定、渗透、环氧树脂包埋、切片、甲苯胺蓝染色。全神经横切面在20x扫描。在ImageJ中对图像进行预处理,测量束状面积,去除背景。将图像导入Ilastik,像素分类模块用于分割髓鞘和轴突。新的CellProfiler管道与Otsu 2阈值处理一起用于分割和量化单个轴突和髓鞘对象。人工获取神经样本的轴突计数和g-比值,并使用该技术进行方法间的比较。结果:该方法可在5分钟内完成全神经横断面分析。Bland-Altman图和类内相关系数证明了手动和使用该方案进行轴突计数之间的可靠性。与手工技术相比,测定g-ratio的准确性也没有统计学上的显著差异(结论:本文提出的方案展示了一种新颖而准确的分割和分析组织学神经横断面的方法。这种方法减少了用户时间和潜在的偏差。它可以分析整个神经而不是随机抽样。最后,该协议只使用研究人员可以自由访问的开源软件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An open-source, user-friendly, machine-learning method for automated segmentation and analysis of peripheral nerve cross-sections.

Introduction: Quantitative neuromorphometry analysis of the peripheral nerve is paramount to nerve regeneration research. However, this technique relies upon accurate segmentation and determination of myelin and axonal area. Manual histological analysis methods are time- consuming, and subject to error and bias. We demonstrate and validate a user-friendly method relying on opensource machine-learning software and no coding knowledge.

Materials methods: 19 rat facial nerve segments were fixed, osmicated, embedded in epoxy, sectioned, and stained with toluidine blue. Whole nerve cross-sections were scanned at 20x. Images were pre-processed in ImageJ to measure fascicular area and remove background. Images were imported into Ilastik and the pixel classification module used to segment myelin and axons. A novel CellProfiler pipeline was used with Otsu 2-threshold processing to segment and quantify individual axon and myelin objects from segmentations. Axon counts and g-ratio of nerve samples were acquired manually and using this technique to compare between methods.

Results: Analysis of an entire nerve cross-section can be completed with this method in less than 5 minutes. Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated reliability between axon counts performed manually and with this protocol. There was also no statistically significant difference in accuracy in determining g-ratio compared to manual techniques (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The protocol presented here demonstrates a novel and accurate means of segmenting and analyzing histological nerve cross-sections. This method decreases both user time and potential bias. It enables analysis of an entire nerve versus random sampling. Lastly, this protocol utilizes only opensource software freely accessible to researchers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
Lesser Occipital Nerve Decompression Through a Single Vertical Midline Incision Reduces Reoperation Rates. Preferences for Care Among African American Women Considering Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Single-stage reconstruction of congenital multi-finger syndactyly with contiguous cross-shaped advancement flaps. The Cost of Cutting Time: The Risks of Time-Based Anesthesia Reimbursements for Plastic Surgery". Buccinator myomucosal neurovascular Island flap: anatomic cadaveric study and clinical experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1