Anna R Todd, Mawaddah Alrajraji, Kathryn Sawa, Joan E Lipa, Laura Snell
{"title":"自体乳房再造术中腹下深穿支皮瓣自由保留的循证算法。","authors":"Anna R Todd, Mawaddah Alrajraji, Kathryn Sawa, Joan E Lipa, Laura Snell","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap has become the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Flap take-back to the operating room (OR) is an uncommon but difficult situation, requiring prompt and accessible resources. We conducted a literature review and independent expert review to inform evidence-based perioperative algorithms in the event of DIEP flap compromise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of the literature was conducted, including MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. Publications examining free flap re-exploration in breast reconstruction were used to inform evidence-based clinical algorithms. The algorithms then underwent expert review and revisions from 6 international experts in microsurgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three evidence-based management algorithms were created. The first algorithm outlines perioperative management strategies to optimize patient care and prompt return to the OR. Nonconstricting flap inset after take-back, salvage medical strategies and postoperative management following flap failure were additionally included. Algorithms 2 (venous congestion) and 3 (vascular thrombosis) provide specific intraoperative strategies surrounding mechanical decompression, pedicle exposure, assessment and extraction of thrombosis, identification and use of alternative recipient vessels, and the usage of intraoperative thrombolytics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A coherent and stepwise approach to DIEP flap compromise in breast reconstruction was developed. These expert-reviewed algorithms provide an approachable and evidence-based structure to support return to the OR and serve as readily available resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 1","pages":"e6477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based Algorithms for Free Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Salvage in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Anna R Todd, Mawaddah Alrajraji, Kathryn Sawa, Joan E Lipa, Laura Snell\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap has become the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Flap take-back to the operating room (OR) is an uncommon but difficult situation, requiring prompt and accessible resources. We conducted a literature review and independent expert review to inform evidence-based perioperative algorithms in the event of DIEP flap compromise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of the literature was conducted, including MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. Publications examining free flap re-exploration in breast reconstruction were used to inform evidence-based clinical algorithms. The algorithms then underwent expert review and revisions from 6 international experts in microsurgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three evidence-based management algorithms were created. The first algorithm outlines perioperative management strategies to optimize patient care and prompt return to the OR. Nonconstricting flap inset after take-back, salvage medical strategies and postoperative management following flap failure were additionally included. Algorithms 2 (venous congestion) and 3 (vascular thrombosis) provide specific intraoperative strategies surrounding mechanical decompression, pedicle exposure, assessment and extraction of thrombosis, identification and use of alternative recipient vessels, and the usage of intraoperative thrombolytics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A coherent and stepwise approach to DIEP flap compromise in breast reconstruction was developed. These expert-reviewed algorithms provide an approachable and evidence-based structure to support return to the OR and serve as readily available resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"e6477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腹下深穿支游离皮瓣重建乳房已成为自体乳房重建的金标准。皮瓣带回手术室是一种罕见但困难的情况,需要及时和可获得的资源。我们进行了文献综述和独立专家评审,为DIEP皮瓣受损事件的循证围手术期算法提供信息。方法:对MEDLINE、Embase、谷歌Scholar、Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials等文献进行综述。研究乳房重建中游离皮瓣再探查的出版物为循证临床算法提供了信息。然后由6位国际显微外科专家对算法进行了专家审查和修订。结果:建立了3种循证管理算法。第一种算法概述了围手术期管理策略,以优化患者护理并及时返回手术室。此外,还包括收回后的非缩窄皮瓣插入,皮瓣失效后的抢救医疗策略和术后处理。算法2(静脉充血)和算法3(血管血栓形成)提供了具体的术中策略,包括机械减压、蒂暴露、血栓形成的评估和提取、替代受体血管的识别和使用,以及术中溶栓剂的使用。结论:建立了一种连贯的、循序渐进的方法来处理DIEP皮瓣在乳房重建术中的损伤。这些专家评审的算法提供了一种可接近的、基于证据的结构,以支持返回手术室,并作为随时可用的资源。
Evidence-based Algorithms for Free Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Salvage in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Background: Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap has become the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Flap take-back to the operating room (OR) is an uncommon but difficult situation, requiring prompt and accessible resources. We conducted a literature review and independent expert review to inform evidence-based perioperative algorithms in the event of DIEP flap compromise.
Methods: A review of the literature was conducted, including MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. Publications examining free flap re-exploration in breast reconstruction were used to inform evidence-based clinical algorithms. The algorithms then underwent expert review and revisions from 6 international experts in microsurgery.
Results: Three evidence-based management algorithms were created. The first algorithm outlines perioperative management strategies to optimize patient care and prompt return to the OR. Nonconstricting flap inset after take-back, salvage medical strategies and postoperative management following flap failure were additionally included. Algorithms 2 (venous congestion) and 3 (vascular thrombosis) provide specific intraoperative strategies surrounding mechanical decompression, pedicle exposure, assessment and extraction of thrombosis, identification and use of alternative recipient vessels, and the usage of intraoperative thrombolytics.
Conclusions: A coherent and stepwise approach to DIEP flap compromise in breast reconstruction was developed. These expert-reviewed algorithms provide an approachable and evidence-based structure to support return to the OR and serve as readily available resources.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.