关于报告和评估质子治疗超出剂量和恒定相对生物学有效性的建议。

Armin Lühr , Dirk Wagenaar , Daniëlle B.P. Eekers , Lars Glimelius , Steven J.M. Habraken , Semi Harrabi , Miranda C.A. Kramer , Ranald I. Mackay , Ana Vaniqui , Alexandru Dasu , Damien C. Weber
{"title":"关于报告和评估质子治疗超出剂量和恒定相对生物学有效性的建议。","authors":"Armin Lühr ,&nbsp;Dirk Wagenaar ,&nbsp;Daniëlle B.P. Eekers ,&nbsp;Lars Glimelius ,&nbsp;Steven J.M. Habraken ,&nbsp;Semi Harrabi ,&nbsp;Miranda C.A. Kramer ,&nbsp;Ranald I. Mackay ,&nbsp;Ana Vaniqui ,&nbsp;Alexandru Dasu ,&nbsp;Damien C. Weber","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>In proton therapy, a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is used to convert proton dose into an equivalent photon dose. However, RBE varies with tissue type, fraction dose, and beam quality parameters beyond dose such as linear energy transfer (LET) raising concerns about increased local effectiveness and potential toxicity. This work aims to harmonize quantities used for clinical consideration of variable RBE for proton therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A survey was distributed to proton centres to determine agreement on RBE-related concerns and clinical implementations. A subsequent clinical expert meeting facilitated by the European Particle Therapy Network was held to achieve consensus and to make clinical recommendations how to prescribe and report beyond using dose and constant RBE.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey was answered by 17 out of 23 centres contacted (74%). For proton RBE, most concerns existed regarding toxicity in serial organs, while the assumption of an RBE of 1.1 was considered valid for targets. Most physicists intended to consider a physical quantity beyond dose in clinical decision making.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A constant RBE of 1.1 was the consensus for prescribing dose. However, current practice of recording and reporting dose in proton therapy must be complemented: the recommended quantity beyond dose was the dose-averaged LET in water from primary and secondary protons, normalized to unit density. This will facilitate analyses of treatment data on effectiveness beyond dose and between centres. No consensus on a single variable RBE model was found. More clinical training on proton RBE is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for reporting and evaluating proton therapy beyond dose and constant relative biological effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"Armin Lühr ,&nbsp;Dirk Wagenaar ,&nbsp;Daniëlle B.P. Eekers ,&nbsp;Lars Glimelius ,&nbsp;Steven J.M. Habraken ,&nbsp;Semi Harrabi ,&nbsp;Miranda C.A. Kramer ,&nbsp;Ranald I. Mackay ,&nbsp;Ana Vaniqui ,&nbsp;Alexandru Dasu ,&nbsp;Damien C. Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>In proton therapy, a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is used to convert proton dose into an equivalent photon dose. However, RBE varies with tissue type, fraction dose, and beam quality parameters beyond dose such as linear energy transfer (LET) raising concerns about increased local effectiveness and potential toxicity. This work aims to harmonize quantities used for clinical consideration of variable RBE for proton therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A survey was distributed to proton centres to determine agreement on RBE-related concerns and clinical implementations. A subsequent clinical expert meeting facilitated by the European Particle Therapy Network was held to achieve consensus and to make clinical recommendations how to prescribe and report beyond using dose and constant RBE.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey was answered by 17 out of 23 centres contacted (74%). For proton RBE, most concerns existed regarding toxicity in serial organs, while the assumption of an RBE of 1.1 was considered valid for targets. Most physicists intended to consider a physical quantity beyond dose in clinical decision making.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A constant RBE of 1.1 was the consensus for prescribing dose. However, current practice of recording and reporting dose in proton therapy must be complemented: the recommended quantity beyond dose was the dose-averaged LET in water from primary and secondary protons, normalized to unit density. This will facilitate analyses of treatment data on effectiveness beyond dose and between centres. No consensus on a single variable RBE model was found. More clinical training on proton RBE is needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750264/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在质子治疗中,使用1.1的相对生物有效性(RBE)将质子剂量转换为等效光子剂量。然而,RBE随组织类型、分数剂量和剂量以外的光束质量参数(如线性能量转移(LET))而变化,这引起了人们对局部有效性和潜在毒性增加的担忧。这项工作旨在协调用于质子治疗的可变RBE临床考虑的数量。材料和方法:对质子中心进行调查,以确定对rbe相关问题和临床实施的一致意见。随后在欧洲粒子治疗网络的推动下举行了一次临床专家会议,以达成共识,并就如何处方和报告使用剂量和恒定RBE提出临床建议。结果:在联系的23个中心中,有17个(74%)回答了调查。对于质子RBE,大多数关注存在于一系列器官的毒性,而假设RBE为1.1被认为对靶标有效。大多数物理学家打算在临床决策中考虑剂量以外的物理量。结论:处方剂量的一致RBE值为1.1。然而,目前质子治疗中记录和报告剂量的做法必须加以补充:推荐的剂量以外的量是主质子和次级质子在水中的剂量平均LET,标准化为单位密度。这将有助于分析剂量以外和中心之间的有效性治疗数据。在单变量RBE模型上没有发现共识。需要更多的质子RBE临床培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommendations for reporting and evaluating proton therapy beyond dose and constant relative biological effectiveness

Background and purpose

In proton therapy, a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is used to convert proton dose into an equivalent photon dose. However, RBE varies with tissue type, fraction dose, and beam quality parameters beyond dose such as linear energy transfer (LET) raising concerns about increased local effectiveness and potential toxicity. This work aims to harmonize quantities used for clinical consideration of variable RBE for proton therapy.

Materials and methods

A survey was distributed to proton centres to determine agreement on RBE-related concerns and clinical implementations. A subsequent clinical expert meeting facilitated by the European Particle Therapy Network was held to achieve consensus and to make clinical recommendations how to prescribe and report beyond using dose and constant RBE.

Results

The survey was answered by 17 out of 23 centres contacted (74%). For proton RBE, most concerns existed regarding toxicity in serial organs, while the assumption of an RBE of 1.1 was considered valid for targets. Most physicists intended to consider a physical quantity beyond dose in clinical decision making.

Conclusions

A constant RBE of 1.1 was the consensus for prescribing dose. However, current practice of recording and reporting dose in proton therapy must be complemented: the recommended quantity beyond dose was the dose-averaged LET in water from primary and secondary protons, normalized to unit density. This will facilitate analyses of treatment data on effectiveness beyond dose and between centres. No consensus on a single variable RBE model was found. More clinical training on proton RBE is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation for a high-performance cone-beam computed tomography imaging system in the pelvic region Translation of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging onto a magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator in patients with head and neck cancer Normal tissue complication probability model for severe radiation-induced lymphopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy Recommendations for reporting and evaluating proton therapy beyond dose and constant relative biological effectiveness Investigating the potential of diffusion tensor atlases to generate anisotropic clinical tumor volumes in glioblastoma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1