阻碍和促进女性全科医生职业发展的因素:系统回顾。

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0282
Laura Jefferson, Elin Webster, Su Golder, Katie Barnett, Nicola Greenwood, Veronica Dale, Karen Bloor
{"title":"阻碍和促进女性全科医生职业发展的因素:系统回顾。","authors":"Laura Jefferson, Elin Webster, Su Golder, Katie Barnett, Nicola Greenwood, Veronica Dale, Karen Bloor","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite women comprising 52% of full-time equivalent general practitioners (GPs) in England, a significant gender pay gap persists (15% after adjustments). Further understanding of the barriers and facilitators impacting women GPs' careers is needed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and synthesise research evidence exploring barriers to and facilitators of women GPs' careers.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Studies were included of general practitioners conducted in the UK NHS general practice setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Review methods followed Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines to systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC and Google Scholar to identify studies that explored gendered barriers and facilitators to GP careers. An inductive thematic analysis was used to synthesise the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 articles were included in this review, with varied study designs. No relevant intervention studies were identified. There was a lack of recent research evidence; over half of the studies were conducted over 20 years ago. Most met quality criteria, though there were some problems with reporting and adjustment for potential confounders. Studies found barriers at personal, socio-cultural and system levels that inhibit women GPs' careers. While some positive changes have been documented across studies that span some thirty years, many challenges remain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite general practice being a medical specialty where women outnumber men, barriers at personal, socio-cultural and system levels continue to inhibit women GPs' careers.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to and facilitators of women general practitioners' careers: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Jefferson, Elin Webster, Su Golder, Katie Barnett, Nicola Greenwood, Veronica Dale, Karen Bloor\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite women comprising 52% of full-time equivalent general practitioners (GPs) in England, a significant gender pay gap persists (15% after adjustments). Further understanding of the barriers and facilitators impacting women GPs' careers is needed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and synthesise research evidence exploring barriers to and facilitators of women GPs' careers.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Studies were included of general practitioners conducted in the UK NHS general practice setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Review methods followed Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines to systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC and Google Scholar to identify studies that explored gendered barriers and facilitators to GP careers. An inductive thematic analysis was used to synthesise the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 articles were included in this review, with varied study designs. No relevant intervention studies were identified. There was a lack of recent research evidence; over half of the studies were conducted over 20 years ago. Most met quality criteria, though there were some problems with reporting and adjustment for potential confounders. Studies found barriers at personal, socio-cultural and system levels that inhibit women GPs' careers. While some positive changes have been documented across studies that span some thirty years, many challenges remain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite general practice being a medical specialty where women outnumber men, barriers at personal, socio-cultural and system levels continue to inhibit women GPs' careers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管女性占英国全职同等全科医生(gp)的52%,但显著的性别薪酬差距仍然存在(调整后为15%)。需要进一步了解影响女性全科医生职业生涯的障碍和促进因素。目的:识别和综合研究证据,探索女性全科医生职业生涯的障碍和促进因素。设计与设置:对定性和定量研究进行系统回顾。研究包括在英国国民健康保险制度下进行的全科医生。方法:综述方法遵循Cochrane和PRISMA指南,系统检索MEDLINE、Embase、HMIC和谷歌Scholar,以确定探讨GP职业生涯性别障碍和促进因素的研究。采用归纳专题分析来综合证据。结果:本综述纳入了21篇文章,研究设计多种多样。未发现相关干预研究。缺乏最近的研究证据;超过一半的研究是在20多年前进行的。大多数符合质量标准,尽管在报告和调整潜在混杂因素方面存在一些问题。研究发现,个人、社会文化和制度层面的障碍阻碍了女性全科医生的职业发展。虽然在跨度约30年的研究中记录了一些积极的变化,但仍存在许多挑战。结论:尽管全科医生是女性多于男性的医学专业,但个人、社会文化和系统层面的障碍继续阻碍着女性全科医生的职业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers to and facilitators of women general practitioners' careers: a systematic review.

Background: Despite women comprising 52% of full-time equivalent general practitioners (GPs) in England, a significant gender pay gap persists (15% after adjustments). Further understanding of the barriers and facilitators impacting women GPs' careers is needed.

Aim: To identify and synthesise research evidence exploring barriers to and facilitators of women GPs' careers.

Design & setting: Systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Studies were included of general practitioners conducted in the UK NHS general practice setting.

Method: Review methods followed Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines to systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC and Google Scholar to identify studies that explored gendered barriers and facilitators to GP careers. An inductive thematic analysis was used to synthesise the evidence.

Results: 21 articles were included in this review, with varied study designs. No relevant intervention studies were identified. There was a lack of recent research evidence; over half of the studies were conducted over 20 years ago. Most met quality criteria, though there were some problems with reporting and adjustment for potential confounders. Studies found barriers at personal, socio-cultural and system levels that inhibit women GPs' careers. While some positive changes have been documented across studies that span some thirty years, many challenges remain.

Conclusion: Despite general practice being a medical specialty where women outnumber men, barriers at personal, socio-cultural and system levels continue to inhibit women GPs' careers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
The association between coding for chronic kidney disease and kidney replacement therapy incidence at CCG-level in England: an ecological study. Lifestyle interventions for depression in primary care: a qualitative study. Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey. Adjusting primary-care funding by deprivation: a cross-sectional study of Lower layer Super Output Areas in England. Identifying impaired mental health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1