{"title":"重症监护病房患者睡眠障碍非药物治疗的最佳证据总结。","authors":"Meijie Zhang, Fei Yang, Chenwei Wang, Meng Xiu, Weiying Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To retrieve, evaluate and summarise the best evidence for non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in ICU patients, and to provide basis for clinical nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was an evidence summary followed by the evidence summary reporting standard of Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All evidence on non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in ICU patients from both domestic and international databases and relevant websites was systematically searched, including guidelines, expert consensuses, best practice, clinical decision-making, evidence summaries and systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Joanna Briggs Institute, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Yi Maitong Guidelines Network, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, Canadian Medical Association: Clinical Practice Guideline, Guidelines International Network, WHO, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang database, VIP database, SinoMed, The American Psychological Association, European Sleep Research Society, American Academy of Sleep Medicine and National Sleep Foundation were searched from the establishment of the databases to June 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 pieces of literature were included, involving 4 guidelines, 2 expert consensuses, 1 best practice and 11 systematic reviews. 25 pieces of evidence covering 4 categories of risk factors, sleep monitoring, non-pharmaceutical intervention, education and training were summarised.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study summarises the best evidence for non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in ICU patients. In clinical application, medical staff should make professional judgements and fully combine clinical situations and patient preferences to select evidence, laying a theoretical foundation for later empirical research to reduce the incidence of sleep disturbances in ICU patients and improve the sleep quality of critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>Medical staff can refer to the best evidence to provide reasonable non-pharmacological management plans for sleep disturbances in ICU patients, improving their sleep quality and life satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The management of sleep disturbances in critically ill patients has not received sufficient attention and standardisation. This study summarises 25 pieces of the best evidence for non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in critically ill patients. Accurate and standardised evaluation and monitoring are the foundation of sleep management for ICU patients. This summary of evidence can help ICU nurses enhance their clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This evidence summary followed the evidence summary reporting specifications of Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing, which were based on the methodological process for the summary of the evidence produced by the Joanna Briggs Institute. This study was based on the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for the Evidence-based Nursing; the registration number is 'ES20231708'.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Summary of the Best Evidence for Non-Pharmacological Management of Sleep Disturbances in Intensive Care Unit Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Meijie Zhang, Fei Yang, Chenwei Wang, Meng Xiu, Weiying Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To retrieve, evaluate and summarise the best evidence for non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in ICU patients, and to provide basis for clinical nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was an evidence summary followed by the evidence summary reporting standard of Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All evidence on non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in ICU patients from both domestic and international databases and relevant websites was systematically searched, including guidelines, expert consensuses, best practice, clinical decision-making, evidence summaries and systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Joanna Briggs Institute, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Yi Maitong Guidelines Network, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, Canadian Medical Association: Clinical Practice Guideline, Guidelines International Network, WHO, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang database, VIP database, SinoMed, The American Psychological Association, European Sleep Research Society, American Academy of Sleep Medicine and National Sleep Foundation were searched from the establishment of the databases to June 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 pieces of literature were included, involving 4 guidelines, 2 expert consensuses, 1 best practice and 11 systematic reviews. 25 pieces of evidence covering 4 categories of risk factors, sleep monitoring, non-pharmaceutical intervention, education and training were summarised.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study summarises the best evidence for non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in ICU patients. In clinical application, medical staff should make professional judgements and fully combine clinical situations and patient preferences to select evidence, laying a theoretical foundation for later empirical research to reduce the incidence of sleep disturbances in ICU patients and improve the sleep quality of critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>Medical staff can refer to the best evidence to provide reasonable non-pharmacological management plans for sleep disturbances in ICU patients, improving their sleep quality and life satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The management of sleep disturbances in critically ill patients has not received sufficient attention and standardisation. This study summarises 25 pieces of the best evidence for non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in critically ill patients. Accurate and standardised evaluation and monitoring are the foundation of sleep management for ICU patients. This summary of evidence can help ICU nurses enhance their clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This evidence summary followed the evidence summary reporting specifications of Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing, which were based on the methodological process for the summary of the evidence produced by the Joanna Briggs Institute. This study was based on the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for the Evidence-based Nursing; the registration number is 'ES20231708'.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17622\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:检索、评价和总结非药物治疗ICU患者睡眠障碍的最佳证据,为临床护理实践提供依据。设计:本研究采用证据总结,遵循复旦大学循证护理中心证据总结报告标准。方法:系统检索国内外数据库及相关网站关于ICU患者睡眠障碍非药物管理的所有证据,包括指南、专家共识、最佳实践、临床决策、证据总结和系统评价。数据来源:UpToDate,英国医学杂志最佳实践,乔安娜布里格斯研究所,苏格兰校际指南网络,国家指南信息中心,国家健康与临床卓越研究所,易迈通指南网络,安大略省注册护士协会,加拿大医学会检索数据库自建库至2024年6月1日,检索数据库包括:Clinical Practice Guidelines、Guidelines International Network、WHO、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、CNKI、万方数据库、VIP数据库、中国医学信息网、美国心理学会、欧洲睡眠研究学会、美国睡眠医学学会、美国国家睡眠基金会。结果:共纳入文献18篇,其中指南4篇,专家共识2篇,最佳实践1篇,系统评价11篇。总结了25项证据,涵盖4类危险因素、睡眠监测、非药物干预、教育和培训。结论:本研究总结了非药物治疗ICU患者睡眠障碍的最佳证据。在临床应用中,医务人员应做出专业判断,充分结合临床情况和患者偏好选择证据,为后期的实证研究奠定理论基础,以减少ICU患者睡眠障碍的发生率,提高危重患者的睡眠质量。对专业和患者护理的启示:医护人员可以参考最佳证据,为ICU患者提供合理的非药物管理方案,提高患者的睡眠质量和生活满意度。影响:危重症患者睡眠障碍的管理还没有得到足够的重视和规范。本研究总结了25条危重患者睡眠障碍非药物治疗的最佳证据。准确、规范的评估与监测是ICU患者睡眠管理的基础。这一证据总结可以帮助ICU护士提高临床实践水平。报告方法:本证据总结遵循复旦大学循证护理中心的证据总结报告规范,该规范基于Joanna Briggs研究所的证据总结方法学流程。本研究依据复旦大学循证护理中心的证据总结报告规范;注册号为ES20231708。患者或公众捐赠:无患者或公众捐赠。
Summary of the Best Evidence for Non-Pharmacological Management of Sleep Disturbances in Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Aim: To retrieve, evaluate and summarise the best evidence for non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in ICU patients, and to provide basis for clinical nursing practice.
Design: This study was an evidence summary followed by the evidence summary reporting standard of Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing.
Methods: All evidence on non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in ICU patients from both domestic and international databases and relevant websites was systematically searched, including guidelines, expert consensuses, best practice, clinical decision-making, evidence summaries and systematic review.
Data sources: UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Joanna Briggs Institute, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Yi Maitong Guidelines Network, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, Canadian Medical Association: Clinical Practice Guideline, Guidelines International Network, WHO, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang database, VIP database, SinoMed, The American Psychological Association, European Sleep Research Society, American Academy of Sleep Medicine and National Sleep Foundation were searched from the establishment of the databases to June 1, 2024.
Results: A total of 18 pieces of literature were included, involving 4 guidelines, 2 expert consensuses, 1 best practice and 11 systematic reviews. 25 pieces of evidence covering 4 categories of risk factors, sleep monitoring, non-pharmaceutical intervention, education and training were summarised.
Conclusion: This study summarises the best evidence for non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in ICU patients. In clinical application, medical staff should make professional judgements and fully combine clinical situations and patient preferences to select evidence, laying a theoretical foundation for later empirical research to reduce the incidence of sleep disturbances in ICU patients and improve the sleep quality of critically ill patients.
Implications for the profession and patient care: Medical staff can refer to the best evidence to provide reasonable non-pharmacological management plans for sleep disturbances in ICU patients, improving their sleep quality and life satisfaction.
Impact: The management of sleep disturbances in critically ill patients has not received sufficient attention and standardisation. This study summarises 25 pieces of the best evidence for non-pharmacological management of sleep disturbances in critically ill patients. Accurate and standardised evaluation and monitoring are the foundation of sleep management for ICU patients. This summary of evidence can help ICU nurses enhance their clinical practice.
Reporting method: This evidence summary followed the evidence summary reporting specifications of Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing, which were based on the methodological process for the summary of the evidence produced by the Joanna Briggs Institute. This study was based on the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for the Evidence-based Nursing; the registration number is 'ES20231708'.
Patient or public contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.