心理测量网络的节点参数聚合。

IF 5.3 3区 心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Multivariate Behavioral Research Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1080/00273171.2025.2450648
K B S Huth, B DeLong, L Waldorp, M Marsman, M Rhemtulla
{"title":"心理测量网络的节点参数聚合。","authors":"K B S Huth, B DeLong, L Waldorp, M Marsman, M Rhemtulla","doi":"10.1080/00273171.2025.2450648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychometric networks can be estimated using nodewise regression to estimate edge weights when the joint distribution is analytically difficult to derive or the estimation is too computationally intensive. The nodewise approach runs generalized linear models with each node as the outcome. Two regression coefficients are obtained for each link, which need to be aggregated to obtain the edge weight (i.e., the conditional association). The nodewise approach has been shown to reveal the true graph structure. However, for continuous variables, the regression coefficients are scaled differently than the partial correlations, and therefore the nodewise approach may lead to different edge weights. Here, the aggregation of the two regression coefficients is crucial in obtaining the true partial correlation. We show that when the correlations of the two predictors with the control variables are different, averaging the regression coefficients leads to an asymptotically biased estimator of the partial correlation. This is likely to occur when a variable has a high correlation with other nodes in the network (e.g., variables in the same domain) and a lower correlation with another node (e.g., variables in a different domain). We discuss two different ways of aggregating the regression weights, which can obtain the true partial correlation: first, multiplying the weights and taking their square root, and second, rescaling the regression weight by the residual variances. The two latter estimators can recover the true network structure and edge weights.</p>","PeriodicalId":53155,"journal":{"name":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nodewise Parameter Aggregation for Psychometric Networks.\",\"authors\":\"K B S Huth, B DeLong, L Waldorp, M Marsman, M Rhemtulla\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00273171.2025.2450648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Psychometric networks can be estimated using nodewise regression to estimate edge weights when the joint distribution is analytically difficult to derive or the estimation is too computationally intensive. The nodewise approach runs generalized linear models with each node as the outcome. Two regression coefficients are obtained for each link, which need to be aggregated to obtain the edge weight (i.e., the conditional association). The nodewise approach has been shown to reveal the true graph structure. However, for continuous variables, the regression coefficients are scaled differently than the partial correlations, and therefore the nodewise approach may lead to different edge weights. Here, the aggregation of the two regression coefficients is crucial in obtaining the true partial correlation. We show that when the correlations of the two predictors with the control variables are different, averaging the regression coefficients leads to an asymptotically biased estimator of the partial correlation. This is likely to occur when a variable has a high correlation with other nodes in the network (e.g., variables in the same domain) and a lower correlation with another node (e.g., variables in a different domain). We discuss two different ways of aggregating the regression weights, which can obtain the true partial correlation: first, multiplying the weights and taking their square root, and second, rescaling the regression weight by the residual variances. The two latter estimators can recover the true network structure and edge weights.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multivariate Behavioral Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multivariate Behavioral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2025.2450648\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2025.2450648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当联合分布难以解析导出或估计计算量太大时,可以使用节点回归估计边缘权值。节点智能方法以每个节点作为结果运行广义线性模型。每个链路得到两个回归系数,需要将其聚合得到边权(即条件关联)。节点方法已经被证明可以揭示真实的图结构。然而,对于连续变量,回归系数的尺度不同于部分相关,因此节点方法可能导致不同的边权。在这里,两个回归系数的聚合对于获得真正的偏相关至关重要。我们表明,当两个预测因子与控制变量的相关性不同时,平均回归系数会导致偏相关的渐近偏估计。当一个变量与网络中的其他节点(例如,同一领域的变量)具有高相关性,而与另一个节点(例如,不同领域的变量)的相关性较低时,就可能发生这种情况。我们讨论了两种不同的回归权值的聚合方法,可以得到真正的偏相关:第一种方法是将权值相乘并取其平方根,第二种方法是用残差方差重新缩放回归权值。后两个估计器可以恢复真实的网络结构和边权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nodewise Parameter Aggregation for Psychometric Networks.

Psychometric networks can be estimated using nodewise regression to estimate edge weights when the joint distribution is analytically difficult to derive or the estimation is too computationally intensive. The nodewise approach runs generalized linear models with each node as the outcome. Two regression coefficients are obtained for each link, which need to be aggregated to obtain the edge weight (i.e., the conditional association). The nodewise approach has been shown to reveal the true graph structure. However, for continuous variables, the regression coefficients are scaled differently than the partial correlations, and therefore the nodewise approach may lead to different edge weights. Here, the aggregation of the two regression coefficients is crucial in obtaining the true partial correlation. We show that when the correlations of the two predictors with the control variables are different, averaging the regression coefficients leads to an asymptotically biased estimator of the partial correlation. This is likely to occur when a variable has a high correlation with other nodes in the network (e.g., variables in the same domain) and a lower correlation with another node (e.g., variables in a different domain). We discuss two different ways of aggregating the regression weights, which can obtain the true partial correlation: first, multiplying the weights and taking their square root, and second, rescaling the regression weight by the residual variances. The two latter estimators can recover the true network structure and edge weights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Multivariate Behavioral Research 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multivariate Behavioral Research (MBR) publishes a variety of substantive, methodological, and theoretical articles in all areas of the social and behavioral sciences. Most MBR articles fall into one of two categories. Substantive articles report on applications of sophisticated multivariate research methods to study topics of substantive interest in personality, health, intelligence, industrial/organizational, and other behavioral science areas. Methodological articles present and/or evaluate new developments in multivariate methods, or address methodological issues in current research. We also encourage submission of integrative articles related to pedagogy involving multivariate research methods, and to historical treatments of interest and relevance to multivariate research methods.
期刊最新文献
Interrater Reliability for Interdependent Social Network Data: A Generalizability Theory Approach. Estimated Factor Scores Are Not True Factor Scores. Nodewise Parameter Aggregation for Psychometric Networks. Evidence That Growth Mixture Model Results Are Highly Sensitive to Scoring Decisions. Non-Stationarity in Time-Series Analysis: Modeling Stochastic and Deterministic Trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1