教师和家长对小学生智力投资的评估是认知需求变化的预测因素。

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.3390/jintelligence13010010
Anke Hufer-Thamm, Rolf Jürgens, Sebastian Bergold, Ricarda Steinmayr
{"title":"教师和家长对小学生智力投资的评估是认知需求变化的预测因素。","authors":"Anke Hufer-Thamm, Rolf Jürgens, Sebastian Bergold, Ricarda Steinmayr","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence13010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated whether parents' and teachers' evaluations of children's intellectual investment would predict a change in children's need for cognition (NFC) over one year. An exploratory look at how teachers' evaluations are predicted by a range of factors was also taken. <i>N</i> = 565 third-graders (298 girls; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 8.40, <i>SD</i> = 0.59) and teachers (<i>N</i> = 39) were surveyed in 2021 and 2022. The parents (<i>N</i> = 452) provided the data in 2021. Longitudinal data were analyzed by means of latent change score models (LCSMs). Changes in the teachers' evaluations and in the children's cognitive engagement differed between the children. However, there was no effect of the parents' or teachers' assessments on the development of the children's NFC. The change in the teachers' assessment was negatively related to their initial judgment and the children's age; it was positively related to the pupils' fluid intelligence. The results and implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11766036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers' and Parents' Assessments of Primary School Children's Intellectual Investment as Predictors of Change in Need for Cognition.\",\"authors\":\"Anke Hufer-Thamm, Rolf Jürgens, Sebastian Bergold, Ricarda Steinmayr\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jintelligence13010010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study investigated whether parents' and teachers' evaluations of children's intellectual investment would predict a change in children's need for cognition (NFC) over one year. An exploratory look at how teachers' evaluations are predicted by a range of factors was also taken. <i>N</i> = 565 third-graders (298 girls; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 8.40, <i>SD</i> = 0.59) and teachers (<i>N</i> = 39) were surveyed in 2021 and 2022. The parents (<i>N</i> = 452) provided the data in 2021. Longitudinal data were analyzed by means of latent change score models (LCSMs). Changes in the teachers' evaluations and in the children's cognitive engagement differed between the children. However, there was no effect of the parents' or teachers' assessments on the development of the children's NFC. The change in the teachers' assessment was negatively related to their initial judgment and the children's age; it was positively related to the pupils' fluid intelligence. The results and implications are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11766036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13010010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13010010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了父母和教师对儿童智力投入的评价是否能预测儿童一年内认知需要的变化。此外,还对一系列因素如何预测教师的评价进行了探索性研究。N = 565名三年级学生(298名女生;Mage = 8.40, SD = 0.59),教师(N = 39)分别于2021年和2022年接受调查。这些家长(N = 452)在2021年提供了数据。纵向资料采用潜在变化评分模型(lcsm)进行分析。教师评价和儿童认知投入的变化在儿童之间存在差异。然而,父母和教师的评价对儿童NFC的发展没有影响。教师评价的变化与教师的初始判断和幼儿的年龄呈负相关;这与学生的流动智力呈正相关。讨论了研究结果及其意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teachers' and Parents' Assessments of Primary School Children's Intellectual Investment as Predictors of Change in Need for Cognition.

The present study investigated whether parents' and teachers' evaluations of children's intellectual investment would predict a change in children's need for cognition (NFC) over one year. An exploratory look at how teachers' evaluations are predicted by a range of factors was also taken. N = 565 third-graders (298 girls; Mage = 8.40, SD = 0.59) and teachers (N = 39) were surveyed in 2021 and 2022. The parents (N = 452) provided the data in 2021. Longitudinal data were analyzed by means of latent change score models (LCSMs). Changes in the teachers' evaluations and in the children's cognitive engagement differed between the children. However, there was no effect of the parents' or teachers' assessments on the development of the children's NFC. The change in the teachers' assessment was negatively related to their initial judgment and the children's age; it was positively related to the pupils' fluid intelligence. The results and implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alexithymia and Social Cognition in the General Population: Further Evidence on the Relationship with Theory of Mind, Emotion Recognition, and Empathy. Coding Alone? AI-Assisted Software Work and the Decoupling of Productivity from Public Knowledge-Infrastructure Participation. Developing Talent with Artificial Intelligence: Human-AI Symbiotic Theory (HAIST) as a Framework for AI-Mediated Learning and Talent Development. Emotional Intelligence and Cognitive Flexibility as Predictors of Academic Success and Adaptation Outcomes Among International Students in Saudi Universities. Bidirectional Relations Between Spatial and Mathematics Skills in Elementary School Children: The Role of Domain-Specific Anxieties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1