Min Sung Kim , Laura Nattress , Christopher T. Simons
{"title":"研究了蛋白质种类和蛋白质浓度对动植物基饮料的质构和口感感官特性的影响","authors":"Min Sung Kim , Laura Nattress , Christopher T. Simons","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent consumer demand has driven the food industry to develop the next-generation plant-based beverages. One major challenge has been mimicking the desirable textural and mouthfeel properties of animal-based counterparts. Despite the critical role of these properties in consumer acceptance, research comparing these aspects in plant- and animal-based beverages remains limited. This study addressed this gap by examining the impact of protein type (animal vs. plant) and concentration (8 g vs 13 g/8 fl.oz) on beverage texture and mouthfeel characteristics while developing a comprehensive sensory lexicon for these attributes. Sixteen texture and mouthfeel descriptors were generated, each with unique definitions and references. Sixteen assessors evaluated 14 different beverages that were grouped by protein content: low protein (LP; 8 g of protein/8 fl. oz) and high protein (HP; 13 g of protein/8 fl. oz). Each beverage group included two animal-based beverages (commercial skim milk [CSM] and milk protein isolate [MPI]) and five plant-based beverages (pea protein isolate [PPI], soy protein concentrate [SPC] and three types of soy protein isolates [SPI 1–3]). Similarities were observed between LP animal-based beverages, while small differences were observed within LP-SPIs. LP-SPC was significantly different for 8 out of the 16 attributes compared to all other LP-beverages. The same trends were observed in HP-beverages, with the differences among protein sources in the LP-beverages consistently mirrored in HP-beverages. These findings underscore that textural and mouthfeel differences between plant and animal-based beverages are predominantly influenced by the type of protein used rather than protein concentrations within the range of 8–13 g/8 fl. oz.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105399"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the effect of protein type and protein concentration on texture and mouthfeel sensory properties of plant and animal-based beverages\",\"authors\":\"Min Sung Kim , Laura Nattress , Christopher T. Simons\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent consumer demand has driven the food industry to develop the next-generation plant-based beverages. One major challenge has been mimicking the desirable textural and mouthfeel properties of animal-based counterparts. Despite the critical role of these properties in consumer acceptance, research comparing these aspects in plant- and animal-based beverages remains limited. This study addressed this gap by examining the impact of protein type (animal vs. plant) and concentration (8 g vs 13 g/8 fl.oz) on beverage texture and mouthfeel characteristics while developing a comprehensive sensory lexicon for these attributes. Sixteen texture and mouthfeel descriptors were generated, each with unique definitions and references. Sixteen assessors evaluated 14 different beverages that were grouped by protein content: low protein (LP; 8 g of protein/8 fl. oz) and high protein (HP; 13 g of protein/8 fl. oz). Each beverage group included two animal-based beverages (commercial skim milk [CSM] and milk protein isolate [MPI]) and five plant-based beverages (pea protein isolate [PPI], soy protein concentrate [SPC] and three types of soy protein isolates [SPI 1–3]). Similarities were observed between LP animal-based beverages, while small differences were observed within LP-SPIs. LP-SPC was significantly different for 8 out of the 16 attributes compared to all other LP-beverages. The same trends were observed in HP-beverages, with the differences among protein sources in the LP-beverages consistently mirrored in HP-beverages. These findings underscore that textural and mouthfeel differences between plant and animal-based beverages are predominantly influenced by the type of protein used rather than protein concentrations within the range of 8–13 g/8 fl. oz.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400301X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400301X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近的消费者需求推动了食品行业开发下一代植物性饮料。一个主要的挑战是模仿动物制品的理想质地和口感。尽管这些特性在消费者接受度中起着关键作用,但比较植物和动物基饮料中这些方面的研究仍然有限。本研究通过检查蛋白质类型(动物与植物)和浓度(8 g vs 13 g/8 fl.oz)对饮料质地和口感特征的影响来解决这一差距,同时为这些属性开发了一个全面的感官词典。生成了16个质地和口感描述符,每个描述符都有独特的定义和引用。16名评估人员对14种不同的饮料进行了评估,这些饮料按蛋白质含量分组:低蛋白质(LP);8 g蛋白质/8 fl. oz)和高蛋白(HP;13 g蛋白质/8 fl. oz)。每个饮料组包括两种动物基饮料(商业脱脂奶[CSM]和分离奶蛋白[MPI])和五种植物基饮料(豌豆分离蛋白[PPI]、大豆浓缩蛋白[SPC]和三种大豆分离蛋白[SPI 1-3])。LP动物基饮料之间存在相似性,而LP- spi之间存在微小差异。与所有其他lp饮料相比,LP-SPC在16个属性中的8个属性显着不同。在hp饮料中观察到同样的趋势,hp饮料中蛋白质来源的差异一致反映在hp饮料中。这些发现强调植物性和动物性饮料之间的口感和口感差异主要受所用蛋白质类型的影响,而不是在8 - 13克/8盎司范围内的蛋白质浓度。
Investigating the effect of protein type and protein concentration on texture and mouthfeel sensory properties of plant and animal-based beverages
Recent consumer demand has driven the food industry to develop the next-generation plant-based beverages. One major challenge has been mimicking the desirable textural and mouthfeel properties of animal-based counterparts. Despite the critical role of these properties in consumer acceptance, research comparing these aspects in plant- and animal-based beverages remains limited. This study addressed this gap by examining the impact of protein type (animal vs. plant) and concentration (8 g vs 13 g/8 fl.oz) on beverage texture and mouthfeel characteristics while developing a comprehensive sensory lexicon for these attributes. Sixteen texture and mouthfeel descriptors were generated, each with unique definitions and references. Sixteen assessors evaluated 14 different beverages that were grouped by protein content: low protein (LP; 8 g of protein/8 fl. oz) and high protein (HP; 13 g of protein/8 fl. oz). Each beverage group included two animal-based beverages (commercial skim milk [CSM] and milk protein isolate [MPI]) and five plant-based beverages (pea protein isolate [PPI], soy protein concentrate [SPC] and three types of soy protein isolates [SPI 1–3]). Similarities were observed between LP animal-based beverages, while small differences were observed within LP-SPIs. LP-SPC was significantly different for 8 out of the 16 attributes compared to all other LP-beverages. The same trends were observed in HP-beverages, with the differences among protein sources in the LP-beverages consistently mirrored in HP-beverages. These findings underscore that textural and mouthfeel differences between plant and animal-based beverages are predominantly influenced by the type of protein used rather than protein concentrations within the range of 8–13 g/8 fl. oz.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.