基于一致性训练和三向决策的半监督信用评分多视角拒绝推理

IF 7.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Omega-international Journal of Management Science Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2025.103280
Haoxin Tang, Decui Liang
{"title":"基于一致性训练和三向决策的半监督信用评分多视角拒绝推理","authors":"Haoxin Tang,&nbsp;Decui Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In credit scoring, reject inference based on semi-supervised learning has shown better performance compared to those based on statistical methods. However, the problem of inconsistent data distribution between accepted and rejected samples still exists during model training, which may violate the smoothness assumption of semi-supervised learning. Besides, multi-view learning has demonstrated its effectiveness, but its validity in reject inference still needs to be verified. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-view reject inference approach (MRIA) based on three-way decision and consistency training. Specifically, with the aid of three-way decision, we sift valuable rejected samples from the profitability and accuracy objects, which brings the rejected samples better approximate the smooth assumption of semi-supervised learning. Then, based on the above-mentioned two objects, we construct multi-views by utilizing feature selection and train the reject inference model using consistency training, which can enhance the reliability and robustness. Finally, a dynamic fusion method built on the distance to model (DM) is employed for multi-view fusion. This paper not only theoretically demonstrates that high-quality data augmentation consistency training can result in a smaller error bound for the reject inference tasks, but also verifies the effectiveness of MRIA via a series of experimental analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103280"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-view reject inference for semi-supervised credit scoring with consistency training and three-way decision\",\"authors\":\"Haoxin Tang,&nbsp;Decui Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In credit scoring, reject inference based on semi-supervised learning has shown better performance compared to those based on statistical methods. However, the problem of inconsistent data distribution between accepted and rejected samples still exists during model training, which may violate the smoothness assumption of semi-supervised learning. Besides, multi-view learning has demonstrated its effectiveness, but its validity in reject inference still needs to be verified. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-view reject inference approach (MRIA) based on three-way decision and consistency training. Specifically, with the aid of three-way decision, we sift valuable rejected samples from the profitability and accuracy objects, which brings the rejected samples better approximate the smooth assumption of semi-supervised learning. Then, based on the above-mentioned two objects, we construct multi-views by utilizing feature selection and train the reject inference model using consistency training, which can enhance the reliability and robustness. Finally, a dynamic fusion method built on the distance to model (DM) is employed for multi-view fusion. This paper not only theoretically demonstrates that high-quality data augmentation consistency training can result in a smaller error bound for the reject inference tasks, but also verifies the effectiveness of MRIA via a series of experimental analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在信用评分中,基于半监督学习的拒绝推理比基于统计方法的拒绝推理表现出更好的性能。然而,在模型训练过程中仍然存在接受样本和拒绝样本之间数据分布不一致的问题,这可能违反了半监督学习的平滑假设。此外,多视图学习已经证明了其有效性,但其在拒绝推理中的有效性仍有待验证。为此,本文提出了一种基于三向决策和一致性训练的多视图拒绝推理方法(MRIA)。具体来说,我们借助三向决策,从盈利能力和准确率目标中筛选出有价值的拒绝样本,使得拒绝样本更接近半监督学习的平滑假设。然后,在上述两个对象的基础上,利用特征选择构造多视图,并利用一致性训练训练拒绝推理模型,提高了可靠性和鲁棒性。最后,采用基于模型距离(DM)的动态融合方法进行多视图融合。本文不仅从理论上证明了高质量的数据增强一致性训练可以使拒绝推理任务的误差范围更小,而且通过一系列的实验分析验证了MRIA的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-view reject inference for semi-supervised credit scoring with consistency training and three-way decision
In credit scoring, reject inference based on semi-supervised learning has shown better performance compared to those based on statistical methods. However, the problem of inconsistent data distribution between accepted and rejected samples still exists during model training, which may violate the smoothness assumption of semi-supervised learning. Besides, multi-view learning has demonstrated its effectiveness, but its validity in reject inference still needs to be verified. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-view reject inference approach (MRIA) based on three-way decision and consistency training. Specifically, with the aid of three-way decision, we sift valuable rejected samples from the profitability and accuracy objects, which brings the rejected samples better approximate the smooth assumption of semi-supervised learning. Then, based on the above-mentioned two objects, we construct multi-views by utilizing feature selection and train the reject inference model using consistency training, which can enhance the reliability and robustness. Finally, a dynamic fusion method built on the distance to model (DM) is employed for multi-view fusion. This paper not only theoretically demonstrates that high-quality data augmentation consistency training can result in a smaller error bound for the reject inference tasks, but also verifies the effectiveness of MRIA via a series of experimental analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
期刊最新文献
On the impact of operation flexibility in the flexible job-shop scheduling problem Quadratic optimization for sustainable agriculture: A study of mixed cropping systems Dynamic control of ticket inspectors in public transportation systems Game decision analysis in a two-tier healthcare system under capitation payment for primary outpatient services Integrating LASSO and DEA via Nash bargaining–inspired framework for variable selection under high dimensional data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1