IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2024.101893
Markus Sommer , Martin E. Arendasy , Joachim Fritz Punter , Martina Feldhammer-Kahr , Anita Rieder
{"title":"Does test preparation mediate the effect of parents' level of educational attainment on medical school admission test performance?","authors":"Markus Sommer ,&nbsp;Martin E. Arendasy ,&nbsp;Joachim Fritz Punter ,&nbsp;Martina Feldhammer-Kahr ,&nbsp;Anita Rieder","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The finding that admission test performance correlates with parents' level of educational attainment raised concerns regarding their fair and valid use. Critics argued that this relationship may partly reflect socio-economic differences in test preparation. Using data from three cohorts of medical school applicants we directly tested the postulated mediation hypothesis. Latent class analysis was used to identify four classes of test-takers differing in their use of various test preparation methods. Mediation analyses revealed that although latent test preparation classes differed in admission test performance, test preparation was virtually unrelated to parents' level of educational attainment. This disconfirms the mediation hypothesis. The results were further corroborated by measurement invariance analyses indicating that although test preparation-based score gains were confined to the specific narrower traits, SES-related differences in subtest performance were fully explained by SES-related differences in higher-order traits. This pattern of finding is inconsistent with the hypothesis that SES-related differences in admission test performance largely reflect SES-related differences in the access to test preparation. However, it is consistent with theoretical accounts that attribute SES-related differences in admission test performance to processes that operate from infancy to adulthood, which eventually lead to actual knowledge and intelligence differences at the time-point of admission testing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101893"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000874","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

录取考试成绩与父母教育程度相关的发现,引起了人们对其公平有效使用的关注。批评者认为,这种关系可能部分反映了备考过程中的社会经济差异。利用三批医学院申请者的数据,我们直接检验了假设的中介假说。通过潜类分析,我们确定了在使用各种备考方法方面存在差异的四类考生。中介分析表明,虽然潜在备考类别在入学考试成绩上存在差异,但备考与父母的教育程度几乎没有关系。这与中介假设不符。测量不变量分析进一步证实了这一结果,该分析表明,虽然基于考试准备的分数提高仅限于特定的狭义特质,但与社会经济地位相关的子测试成绩差异完全可以用与社会经济地位相关的高阶特质差异来解释。这种发现模式与以下假设不一致,即与社会经济地位相关的入学考试成绩差异主要反映了与社会经济地位相关的考试准备机会差异。然而,它与以下理论是一致的,即入学测试成绩中与社会经济地位相关的差异是由从婴儿期到成年期的过程造成的,这些过程最终导致了入学测试时间点上的实际知识和智力差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does test preparation mediate the effect of parents' level of educational attainment on medical school admission test performance?
The finding that admission test performance correlates with parents' level of educational attainment raised concerns regarding their fair and valid use. Critics argued that this relationship may partly reflect socio-economic differences in test preparation. Using data from three cohorts of medical school applicants we directly tested the postulated mediation hypothesis. Latent class analysis was used to identify four classes of test-takers differing in their use of various test preparation methods. Mediation analyses revealed that although latent test preparation classes differed in admission test performance, test preparation was virtually unrelated to parents' level of educational attainment. This disconfirms the mediation hypothesis. The results were further corroborated by measurement invariance analyses indicating that although test preparation-based score gains were confined to the specific narrower traits, SES-related differences in subtest performance were fully explained by SES-related differences in higher-order traits. This pattern of finding is inconsistent with the hypothesis that SES-related differences in admission test performance largely reflect SES-related differences in the access to test preparation. However, it is consistent with theoretical accounts that attribute SES-related differences in admission test performance to processes that operate from infancy to adulthood, which eventually lead to actual knowledge and intelligence differences at the time-point of admission testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
Putting the Flynn effect under the microscope: Item-level patterns in NLSYC PIAT-math scores, 1986–2004 Editorial Board The AI attribution gap: Encouraging transparent acknowledgment in the age of AI Does test preparation mediate the effect of parents' level of educational attainment on medical school admission test performance? Shared reading aloud fosters intelligence: Three cluster-randomized control trials in elementary and middle school
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1