IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110750
Jonas Koreis
{"title":"Human–robot vs. human–manual teams: Understanding the dynamics of experience and performance variability in picker-to-parts order picking","authors":"Jonas Koreis","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent technological advances have enabled firms to automate an increasing number of intralogistics operations, yet manual material handling remains pivotal in several industries, particularly in retail applications where brick-and-mortar warehouses still rely on manual picker-to-parts systems. These systems, while labor-intensive, are increasingly being supplemented by technologies such as automated guided vehicles (AGVs) to enhance performance and reduce physical strain on workers. The present study analyzed a pilot test of a new industrial truck deployed as an AGV that automatically follows order pickers in their travels within the warehouse of a brick-and-mortar grocery retailer. The data set comprises 342,601 pick location visits performed in one dedicated warehouse from 01 November 2022 to 30 June 2023, with three order pickers working with an AGV in a human–robot setting and five order pickers working with a manual industrial truck in a human–manual setting, with both groups sharing the identical aisle work space. The human–robot teams demonstrated a 3.6% reduction in order picking time compared to the human–manual teams, with a significant initial performance boost that plateaued over time. Experience had different impacts on the two groups: in the human–robot teams, the benefits of experience diminished more rapidly, indicating a lower incremental gain from additional experience compared to human–manual teams. Conversely, human–manual teams showed continuous improvement in performance as experience accumulated, with each additional day of experience leading to significant gains in order picking performance. The study also highlighted the variation in performance increase in human–robot teams, suggesting that while AGVs may enhance performance, the potential for inconsistent operational methods among workers can lead to fluctuating performance outcomes. The findings provide guidance for researchers and managers in understanding the impacts of experience and automation on performance, thereby aiding in the development of targeted training programs and operational strategies to maximize the benefits of AGVs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 110750"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224008726","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的技术进步使企业能够将越来越多的内部物流操作自动化,但人工物料搬运在一些行业中仍然举足轻重,特别是在零售应用领域,实体仓库仍然依赖人工拣选机到零件系统。这些系统虽然是劳动密集型的,但越来越多地采用自动导引车(AGV)等技术作为补充,以提高性能并减轻工人的体力负担。本研究分析了一种新型工业卡车的试点测试,该卡车作为 AGV 部署,可自动跟随订单拣选人员在一家实体杂货零售商的仓库内移动。数据集包括 2022 年 11 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 30 日期间在一个专用仓库内执行的 342,601 次拣选位置访问,其中 3 名订单拣选员在人类-机器人环境下使用 AGV,5 名订单拣选员在人类-人工环境下使用手动工业卡车,两组人员共享相同的过道工作空间。与人工-机器人小组相比,人工-机器人小组的订单拣选时间缩短了 3.6%,最初的性能提升显著,但随着时间的推移逐渐趋于稳定。经验对两组的影响不同:在人类机器人团队中,经验带来的好处减少得更快,这表明与人类手动团队相比,更多经验带来的增益较低。相反,随着经验的积累,人类-机器人团队的绩效不断提高,每增加一天经验,订单拣选绩效就会显著提高。研究还强调了人类-机器人团队在提高绩效方面的差异,表明虽然 AGV 可以提高绩效,但工人之间操作方法的不一致可能导致绩效结果的波动。研究结果为研究人员和管理人员了解经验和自动化对绩效的影响提供了指导,从而有助于制定有针对性的培训计划和运营策略,最大限度地发挥 AGV 的效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human–robot vs. human–manual teams: Understanding the dynamics of experience and performance variability in picker-to-parts order picking
Recent technological advances have enabled firms to automate an increasing number of intralogistics operations, yet manual material handling remains pivotal in several industries, particularly in retail applications where brick-and-mortar warehouses still rely on manual picker-to-parts systems. These systems, while labor-intensive, are increasingly being supplemented by technologies such as automated guided vehicles (AGVs) to enhance performance and reduce physical strain on workers. The present study analyzed a pilot test of a new industrial truck deployed as an AGV that automatically follows order pickers in their travels within the warehouse of a brick-and-mortar grocery retailer. The data set comprises 342,601 pick location visits performed in one dedicated warehouse from 01 November 2022 to 30 June 2023, with three order pickers working with an AGV in a human–robot setting and five order pickers working with a manual industrial truck in a human–manual setting, with both groups sharing the identical aisle work space. The human–robot teams demonstrated a 3.6% reduction in order picking time compared to the human–manual teams, with a significant initial performance boost that plateaued over time. Experience had different impacts on the two groups: in the human–robot teams, the benefits of experience diminished more rapidly, indicating a lower incremental gain from additional experience compared to human–manual teams. Conversely, human–manual teams showed continuous improvement in performance as experience accumulated, with each additional day of experience leading to significant gains in order picking performance. The study also highlighted the variation in performance increase in human–robot teams, suggesting that while AGVs may enhance performance, the potential for inconsistent operational methods among workers can lead to fluctuating performance outcomes. The findings provide guidance for researchers and managers in understanding the impacts of experience and automation on performance, thereby aiding in the development of targeted training programs and operational strategies to maximize the benefits of AGVs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
Adaptive manufacturing control with Deep Reinforcement Learning for dynamic WIP management in industry 4.0 A deep learning method for assessment of ecological potential in traffic environments Dynamic reliability evaluation of multi-performance sharing and multi-state systems with interdependence AS-IS representation and strategic framework for the design and implementation of a disassembly system A real-time A* algorithm for trajectories generation and collision avoidance in uncertain environments for assembly applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1