zanubrutinib上市后安全性评价:基于FAERS数据库的真实世界药物警戒分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2465872
Xiaolu Chen, Biao Zhang, Yajiao Huang, Yan Chen, Yuanrong Yang
{"title":"zanubrutinib上市后安全性评价:基于FAERS数据库的真实世界药物警戒分析。","authors":"Xiaolu Chen, Biao Zhang, Yajiao Huang, Yan Chen, Yuanrong Yang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zanubrutinib has been demonstrated to have significant response rates and promising survival data in clinical trials. However, real-world adverse events still need to be ameliorated to facilitate rational clinical drug use.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Adverse incident reports from October 2019 to March 2024 were extracted from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Zanubrutinib-related adverse events were obtained after data cleaning and analysis with SAS 9.4. Four methods were utilized to calculate disproportionality and evaluate AE signals of zanubrutinib.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>At the system organ class (SOC) level, one SOC met the criteria of the four algorithms. At the preferred term (PT) level, most AEs are those already included in the product monograph, and no unexpected safety signals have been identified. Furthermore, the average time to onset of adverse events was 134.8 days, with a median time of 16.5 days. Adverse events occurred in 57.96% of cases within 1 month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the adverse events reported in clinical trials and drug labels, no unreported signals were identified. This finding will provide clinicians with a more comprehensive understanding of the clinical application of zanubrutinib and provide valuable insights for future investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-marketing safety evaluation of zanubrutinib: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaolu Chen, Biao Zhang, Yajiao Huang, Yan Chen, Yuanrong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zanubrutinib has been demonstrated to have significant response rates and promising survival data in clinical trials. However, real-world adverse events still need to be ameliorated to facilitate rational clinical drug use.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Adverse incident reports from October 2019 to March 2024 were extracted from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Zanubrutinib-related adverse events were obtained after data cleaning and analysis with SAS 9.4. Four methods were utilized to calculate disproportionality and evaluate AE signals of zanubrutinib.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>At the system organ class (SOC) level, one SOC met the criteria of the four algorithms. At the preferred term (PT) level, most AEs are those already included in the product monograph, and no unexpected safety signals have been identified. Furthermore, the average time to onset of adverse events was 134.8 days, with a median time of 16.5 days. Adverse events occurred in 57.96% of cases within 1 month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the adverse events reported in clinical trials and drug labels, no unreported signals were identified. This finding will provide clinicians with a more comprehensive understanding of the clinical application of zanubrutinib and provide valuable insights for future investigations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2465872\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2465872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在临床试验中,Zanubrutinib已被证明具有显著的缓解率和有希望的生存数据。然而,现实世界的不良事件仍然需要改善,以促进临床合理用药。研究设计和方法:从FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中提取2019年10月至2024年6月的不良事件报告。在数据清洗和SAS 9.4分析后获得zanubrutinib相关不良事件。采用四种方法计算扎鲁替尼的歧化率并评价其声发射信号。结果:在系统器官类(SOC)层面,有1个SOC满足4种算法的标准。在首选术语(PT)级别,大多数ae已经包含在产品各论中,并且没有发现意外的安全信号。此外,不良事件发生的平均时间为134.8天,中位时间为16.5天。1个月内不良事件发生率为57.96%。结论:与临床试验和药物标签中报告的不良事件相反,发现了未报告的与骨髓抑制和血液免疫球蛋白M升高相关的信号。这一发现将使临床医生对zanubrutinib的临床应用有更全面的了解,并为未来的研究提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-marketing safety evaluation of zanubrutinib: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.

Background: Zanubrutinib has been demonstrated to have significant response rates and promising survival data in clinical trials. However, real-world adverse events still need to be ameliorated to facilitate rational clinical drug use.

Research design and methods: Adverse incident reports from October 2019 to March 2024 were extracted from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Zanubrutinib-related adverse events were obtained after data cleaning and analysis with SAS 9.4. Four methods were utilized to calculate disproportionality and evaluate AE signals of zanubrutinib.

Result: At the system organ class (SOC) level, one SOC met the criteria of the four algorithms. At the preferred term (PT) level, most AEs are those already included in the product monograph, and no unexpected safety signals have been identified. Furthermore, the average time to onset of adverse events was 134.8 days, with a median time of 16.5 days. Adverse events occurred in 57.96% of cases within 1 month.

Conclusion: Compared to the adverse events reported in clinical trials and drug labels, no unreported signals were identified. This finding will provide clinicians with a more comprehensive understanding of the clinical application of zanubrutinib and provide valuable insights for future investigations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Tirzepatide data: safety first is safety always! Anticancer drug-induced interstitial lung disease: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements. Concomitant use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and metformin and the risk of osteomyelitis reporting: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS database. A real-world pharmacovigilance study of blinatumomab based on the FDA adverse event reporting system. Post-marketing safety concerns with luspatercept: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1