建立美国大陆地区木本植物春季生长指数

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110443
Joshua J. Hatzis , Mark D. Schwartz , Toby R. Ault , Alison Donnelly , Amanda Gallinat , Xiaolu Li , Theresa M. Crimmins
{"title":"建立美国大陆地区木本植物春季生长指数","authors":"Joshua J. Hatzis ,&nbsp;Mark D. Schwartz ,&nbsp;Toby R. Ault ,&nbsp;Alison Donnelly ,&nbsp;Amanda Gallinat ,&nbsp;Xiaolu Li ,&nbsp;Theresa M. Crimmins","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phenological indices are an effective approach for assessing spatial and temporal patterns and variability in plant development. The Spring Indices (SI-x), two widely adopted phenological indices, have been used in recent decades to predict development of woody plants, and document changes in spring growth timing, especially in North America. However, these two indices (Leaf and Bloom) capture only two “moments” in the continuum of spring when quantities of thermal or photo/thermal energy, associated with seasonal events in plants, are accumulated, limiting their utility to characterize the remainder of the spring season. Further, the Spring Indices do not account for intraspecific variation, limiting their ability to reflect non-cloned plant development. To address these shortcomings, we developed a novel suite of phenological indices that encompass a broader span of the spring season. These indices were constructed using observations contributed to the USA National Phenology Network's <em>Nature's Notebook</em> platform across many non-cloned tree and shrub species’ ranges, thereby incorporating differing regional responses within species due to genetic variations.</div><div>Individual species model predictions of leaf or bloom timing exhibited an average mean absolute error of 8.55 days; most were improved by the inclusion of site-specific latitude, elevation, or 30-year average temperature. Leaf and bloom model outputs for individual species across the spring season were temporally aggregated into four leaf and bloom groups to produce a suite of Spring Development Indices (SDI). Accuracy of the SDI predictions was 0.89 days lower, on average, than the species models, but 2.65 days better than SI-x. Generally, all SDIs were highly correlated. The SDIs exhibiting the most difference from the others were Early leaf, Very Early bloom, and Late bloom. As such, these SDIs provide novel insights, beyond SI-x, into the relative timing of spring-season “moments” across species in space and time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"364 ","pages":"Article 110443"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building spring development indices for woody species in the conterminous United States\",\"authors\":\"Joshua J. Hatzis ,&nbsp;Mark D. Schwartz ,&nbsp;Toby R. Ault ,&nbsp;Alison Donnelly ,&nbsp;Amanda Gallinat ,&nbsp;Xiaolu Li ,&nbsp;Theresa M. Crimmins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Phenological indices are an effective approach for assessing spatial and temporal patterns and variability in plant development. The Spring Indices (SI-x), two widely adopted phenological indices, have been used in recent decades to predict development of woody plants, and document changes in spring growth timing, especially in North America. However, these two indices (Leaf and Bloom) capture only two “moments” in the continuum of spring when quantities of thermal or photo/thermal energy, associated with seasonal events in plants, are accumulated, limiting their utility to characterize the remainder of the spring season. Further, the Spring Indices do not account for intraspecific variation, limiting their ability to reflect non-cloned plant development. To address these shortcomings, we developed a novel suite of phenological indices that encompass a broader span of the spring season. These indices were constructed using observations contributed to the USA National Phenology Network's <em>Nature's Notebook</em> platform across many non-cloned tree and shrub species’ ranges, thereby incorporating differing regional responses within species due to genetic variations.</div><div>Individual species model predictions of leaf or bloom timing exhibited an average mean absolute error of 8.55 days; most were improved by the inclusion of site-specific latitude, elevation, or 30-year average temperature. Leaf and bloom model outputs for individual species across the spring season were temporally aggregated into four leaf and bloom groups to produce a suite of Spring Development Indices (SDI). Accuracy of the SDI predictions was 0.89 days lower, on average, than the species models, but 2.65 days better than SI-x. Generally, all SDIs were highly correlated. The SDIs exhibiting the most difference from the others were Early leaf, Very Early bloom, and Late bloom. As such, these SDIs provide novel insights, beyond SI-x, into the relative timing of spring-season “moments” across species in space and time.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"364 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325000632\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325000632","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物候指数是评估植物发育的时空模式和变异性的有效方法。春季指数(SI-x)是两个被广泛采用的物候指数,近几十年来一直被用于预测木本植物的生长发育,并记录春季生长时间的变化,尤其是在北美洲。然而,这两个指数(叶片指数和开花指数)只捕捉到春季连续过程中的两个 "时刻",即与植物季节性事件相关的热能或光/热能积累的时刻,这限制了它们在描述春季剩余时间特征方面的作用。此外,"春季指数 "没有考虑种内差异,限制了其反映非克隆植物发育的能力。为了解决这些缺陷,我们开发了一套新的物候指数,涵盖了春季更广泛的范围。这些指数是利用在美国国家物候网络的自然笔记本平台上对许多非克隆乔木和灌木物种分布区的观测数据构建的,从而纳入了物种内部因遗传变异而产生的不同区域反应。单个物种模型预测的叶期或花期平均绝对误差为 8.55 天;纳入特定地点的纬度、海拔或 30 年平均气温后,大多数指数都得到了改善。单个物种在整个春季的发叶和开花模型输出被按时间汇总为四个发叶和开花组,以产生一套春季发育指数(SDI)。春季发育指数的预测精度平均比物种模型低 0.89 天,但比 SI-x 高 2.65 天。一般来说,所有 SDI 都高度相关。差异最大的 SDI 是早期叶片、极早期开花和晚期开花。因此,除了 SI-x 外,这些 SDI 还提供了关于不同物种在空间和时间上的春季季节 "时刻 "的相对时间的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building spring development indices for woody species in the conterminous United States
Phenological indices are an effective approach for assessing spatial and temporal patterns and variability in plant development. The Spring Indices (SI-x), two widely adopted phenological indices, have been used in recent decades to predict development of woody plants, and document changes in spring growth timing, especially in North America. However, these two indices (Leaf and Bloom) capture only two “moments” in the continuum of spring when quantities of thermal or photo/thermal energy, associated with seasonal events in plants, are accumulated, limiting their utility to characterize the remainder of the spring season. Further, the Spring Indices do not account for intraspecific variation, limiting their ability to reflect non-cloned plant development. To address these shortcomings, we developed a novel suite of phenological indices that encompass a broader span of the spring season. These indices were constructed using observations contributed to the USA National Phenology Network's Nature's Notebook platform across many non-cloned tree and shrub species’ ranges, thereby incorporating differing regional responses within species due to genetic variations.
Individual species model predictions of leaf or bloom timing exhibited an average mean absolute error of 8.55 days; most were improved by the inclusion of site-specific latitude, elevation, or 30-year average temperature. Leaf and bloom model outputs for individual species across the spring season were temporally aggregated into four leaf and bloom groups to produce a suite of Spring Development Indices (SDI). Accuracy of the SDI predictions was 0.89 days lower, on average, than the species models, but 2.65 days better than SI-x. Generally, all SDIs were highly correlated. The SDIs exhibiting the most difference from the others were Early leaf, Very Early bloom, and Late bloom. As such, these SDIs provide novel insights, beyond SI-x, into the relative timing of spring-season “moments” across species in space and time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing biochar application rate and predicting of climate change impacts on net greenhouse gas emissions in paddy systems using DNDC-BC model Corrigendum to “Shifted trend in drought sensitivity of vegetation productivity from 1982 to 2020” [Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 362 (2024) 1-10/110388] Deep percolation and soil water dynamics under different sand-fixing vegetation types in two different precipitation regions in semiarid sandy Land, Northern China Evaluating the sensitivity of vegetation indices to leaf area index variability at individual tree level using multispectral drone acquisitions Global vegetation vulnerability to drought is underestimated due to the lagged effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1