划定重复间歇在最大重复次数至失败或储备重复次数与运动速度之间关系中的作用。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1177/19417381251315119
Carlos Martínez-Rubio, Andrés Baena-Raya, Mauricio Elías Leandro Quidel-Catrilelbún, Manuel A Rodríguez-Pérez, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla
{"title":"划定重复间歇在最大重复次数至失败或储备重复次数与运动速度之间关系中的作用。","authors":"Carlos Martínez-Rubio, Andrés Baena-Raya, Mauricio Elías Leandro Quidel-Catrilelbún, Manuel A Rodríguez-Pérez, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla","doi":"10.1177/19417381251315119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maximum repetitions to failure (RTF) and repetitions in reserve (RIR) can be estimated through fastest mean velocity (MV<sub>fastest</sub>) and mean velocity (MV), respectively. However, the impact of inter-repetition intervals (IRI) on these relationships in free-weight back squat and bench press exercises is unclear.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The IRI would affect RTF-MV<sub>fastest</sub> and RIR-MV relationships, with a higher goodness-of-fit using self-selected IRI (SSIRI) compared with 0 seconds (IRI0) and 3 seconds (IRI3).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Crossover study design.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen male participants completed 1 session per IRI configuration, consisting of 3 single sets of RTF (65%-75%-85% of the 1-repetition maximum) during the free-weight back squat and bench press exercises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individualized RTF-MV<sub>fastest</sub> and RIR-MV relationships were stronger than generalized (median <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.98 vs 0.65 and 0.84 vs 0.40, respectively). The goodness-of-fit of the relationships was stronger for SSIRI than for IRI0 during back squat (<i>P</i> < .01) and comparable between IRIs during bench press (<i>P</i> ≥ .28). During back squat, MV<sub>fastest</sub> values were higher for IRI0 than for IRI3 and SSIRI (eighth-fifteenth repetitions; <i>P</i> ≤ .07), whereas during the bench press, they were higher for IRI0 than for IRI3 (eleventh-fifteenth repetitions; <i>P</i> ≥ .28). Overall, MV values associated with each RIR were higher for IRI0 than for SSIRI (10 out of 18 comparisons) during back squat, and for IRI0 than for IRI3 and SSIRI (16 and 14 out of 18 comparisons) during bench press.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results highlight the importance of standardizing the IRI during set-to-failure to establish RTF-MV<sub>fastest</sub> and RIR-MV relationships, with SSIRI recommended as a more accurate and effective procedure.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This information may provide practitioners with a valuable tool to objectively quantify the level of effort being exerted during resistance training sets by measuring movement velocity in free-weight exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251315119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delineating the Role of Inter-Repetition Interval in the Relationship between Maximum Repetitions to Failure or Repetitions in Reserve and Movement Velocity.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Martínez-Rubio, Andrés Baena-Raya, Mauricio Elías Leandro Quidel-Catrilelbún, Manuel A Rodríguez-Pérez, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381251315119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maximum repetitions to failure (RTF) and repetitions in reserve (RIR) can be estimated through fastest mean velocity (MV<sub>fastest</sub>) and mean velocity (MV), respectively. However, the impact of inter-repetition intervals (IRI) on these relationships in free-weight back squat and bench press exercises is unclear.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The IRI would affect RTF-MV<sub>fastest</sub> and RIR-MV relationships, with a higher goodness-of-fit using self-selected IRI (SSIRI) compared with 0 seconds (IRI0) and 3 seconds (IRI3).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Crossover study design.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen male participants completed 1 session per IRI configuration, consisting of 3 single sets of RTF (65%-75%-85% of the 1-repetition maximum) during the free-weight back squat and bench press exercises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individualized RTF-MV<sub>fastest</sub> and RIR-MV relationships were stronger than generalized (median <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.98 vs 0.65 and 0.84 vs 0.40, respectively). The goodness-of-fit of the relationships was stronger for SSIRI than for IRI0 during back squat (<i>P</i> < .01) and comparable between IRIs during bench press (<i>P</i> ≥ .28). During back squat, MV<sub>fastest</sub> values were higher for IRI0 than for IRI3 and SSIRI (eighth-fifteenth repetitions; <i>P</i> ≤ .07), whereas during the bench press, they were higher for IRI0 than for IRI3 (eleventh-fifteenth repetitions; <i>P</i> ≥ .28). Overall, MV values associated with each RIR were higher for IRI0 than for SSIRI (10 out of 18 comparisons) during back squat, and for IRI0 than for IRI3 and SSIRI (16 and 14 out of 18 comparisons) during bench press.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results highlight the importance of standardizing the IRI during set-to-failure to establish RTF-MV<sub>fastest</sub> and RIR-MV relationships, with SSIRI recommended as a more accurate and effective procedure.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This information may provide practitioners with a valuable tool to objectively quantify the level of effort being exerted during resistance training sets by measuring movement velocity in free-weight exercises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19417381251315119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251315119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251315119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delineating the Role of Inter-Repetition Interval in the Relationship between Maximum Repetitions to Failure or Repetitions in Reserve and Movement Velocity.

Background: Maximum repetitions to failure (RTF) and repetitions in reserve (RIR) can be estimated through fastest mean velocity (MVfastest) and mean velocity (MV), respectively. However, the impact of inter-repetition intervals (IRI) on these relationships in free-weight back squat and bench press exercises is unclear.

Hypothesis: The IRI would affect RTF-MVfastest and RIR-MV relationships, with a higher goodness-of-fit using self-selected IRI (SSIRI) compared with 0 seconds (IRI0) and 3 seconds (IRI3).

Study design: Crossover study design.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: Eighteen male participants completed 1 session per IRI configuration, consisting of 3 single sets of RTF (65%-75%-85% of the 1-repetition maximum) during the free-weight back squat and bench press exercises.

Results: Individualized RTF-MVfastest and RIR-MV relationships were stronger than generalized (median R2 = 0.98 vs 0.65 and 0.84 vs 0.40, respectively). The goodness-of-fit of the relationships was stronger for SSIRI than for IRI0 during back squat (P < .01) and comparable between IRIs during bench press (P ≥ .28). During back squat, MVfastest values were higher for IRI0 than for IRI3 and SSIRI (eighth-fifteenth repetitions; P ≤ .07), whereas during the bench press, they were higher for IRI0 than for IRI3 (eleventh-fifteenth repetitions; P ≥ .28). Overall, MV values associated with each RIR were higher for IRI0 than for SSIRI (10 out of 18 comparisons) during back squat, and for IRI0 than for IRI3 and SSIRI (16 and 14 out of 18 comparisons) during bench press.

Conclusion: These results highlight the importance of standardizing the IRI during set-to-failure to establish RTF-MVfastest and RIR-MV relationships, with SSIRI recommended as a more accurate and effective procedure.

Clinical relevance: This information may provide practitioners with a valuable tool to objectively quantify the level of effort being exerted during resistance training sets by measuring movement velocity in free-weight exercises.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
相关文献
二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩
IF 8.9 1区 医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim
具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病
IF 3.2 3区 医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939
Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro
封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键
IF 3.4 4区 生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201
Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
期刊最新文献
Sex Differences in Quadriceps Atrophy After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear. Favorable Clinical Outcomes After Humeral Head Depressor Muscle Coactivation Training With EMG for Patients With Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Eccentric Versus Concentric Strengthening in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Relationship Between Running Biomechanics and Core Temperature Across a Competitive Road Race. Subjective Causes for Failure to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1