IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2025.02.012
Dustin Wood , Emmanuel Kofi Adanu , P.D. Harms
{"title":"Expectancy × value models of the relations between demographic, psychological, and situational factors and speeding behavior","authors":"Dustin Wood ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Kofi Adanu ,&nbsp;P.D. Harms","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction:</em> This study illustrates how <em>expectancy × value (E × V)</em> models can be created from responses to driving scenarios to model both: (1) reasons for the general tendency to speed in a particular situation and (2) reasons that specific personal or situational factors predict the likelihood of speeding within that situation. <em>Method:</em> The method was applied to predicting the self-rated likelihood of speeding in a specific driving scenario. Data from 302 participants who completed an online survey were used for the analysis. <em>Results:</em> The E × V models indicated that the average person tended to see both reasons <em>to</em> speed in this situation, such as to arrive at a meeting on time, and reasons <em>not to</em> speed, such as to avoid a crash or speeding ticket. The results further clarify how specific personal and situational factors were associated with reasoning about speeding. For instance, people who described <em>speeding regularly</em> were modeled as more likely to speed in part due to their greater expectation that speeding would be enjoyable and their greater valuation of being on time. And people who described <em>valuing rules</em> were modeled as less likely to speed in part due to greater expectations that speeding would result in a crash or injury. <em>Practical Applications:</em> We describe how E × V models can be further elaborated to better represent the psychological processes and reasoning underlying speeding and other unsafe driving behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 135-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437525000246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本研究说明了如何通过对驾驶场景的反应建立期望值 × 价值(E × V)模型,从而为以下两方面建模:(1)在特定情况下超速的一般倾向的原因;(2)特定个人或情景因素预测在该情况下超速可能性的原因。方法:将该方法应用于预测在特定驾驶场景中超速的自评可能性。分析使用了 302 位完成在线调查的参与者的数据。结果:E × V 模型表明,一般人倾向于认为在这种情况下超速既有理由,如准时赴会,也有不超速的理由,如避免撞车或超速罚单。研究结果进一步阐明了特定的个人和情景因素与超速推理之间的关系。例如,描述经常超速的人被认为更有可能超速,部分原因是他们更期望超速会带来乐趣,也更重视准时。而描述重视规则的人超速的可能性较低,部分原因是他们更期望超速会导致撞车或受伤。实际应用:我们介绍了如何进一步完善 E × V 模型,以更好地反映超速和其他不安全驾驶行为背后的心理过程和推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expectancy × value models of the relations between demographic, psychological, and situational factors and speeding behavior
Introduction: This study illustrates how expectancy × value (E × V) models can be created from responses to driving scenarios to model both: (1) reasons for the general tendency to speed in a particular situation and (2) reasons that specific personal or situational factors predict the likelihood of speeding within that situation. Method: The method was applied to predicting the self-rated likelihood of speeding in a specific driving scenario. Data from 302 participants who completed an online survey were used for the analysis. Results: The E × V models indicated that the average person tended to see both reasons to speed in this situation, such as to arrive at a meeting on time, and reasons not to speed, such as to avoid a crash or speeding ticket. The results further clarify how specific personal and situational factors were associated with reasoning about speeding. For instance, people who described speeding regularly were modeled as more likely to speed in part due to their greater expectation that speeding would be enjoyable and their greater valuation of being on time. And people who described valuing rules were modeled as less likely to speed in part due to greater expectations that speeding would result in a crash or injury. Practical Applications: We describe how E × V models can be further elaborated to better represent the psychological processes and reasoning underlying speeding and other unsafe driving behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of safety warning system on road user behaviors using vision-based tracking algorithm How an institutional setting shape and limit the mitigation of accidents in complex work settings How safety leadership styles impact safety performance: A case study A comparative anthropometric analysis of U.S. female firefighters versus the general female population Prediction and interpretation of crash severity using machine learning based on imbalanced traffic crash data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1