修复界面结构对复合材料层压板疤痕修复机械性能的影响

IF 5.8 3区 工程技术 Q1 POLYMER SCIENCE Polymers Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.3390/polym17040511
Kaomin Zhang, Zhenhu Miao, Haiting Xia, Xiaoyu Yang, Fenglin Tian, Yinghui Zhao
{"title":"修复界面结构对复合材料层压板疤痕修复机械性能的影响","authors":"Kaomin Zhang, Zhenhu Miao, Haiting Xia, Xiaoyu Yang, Fenglin Tian, Yinghui Zhao","doi":"10.3390/polym17040511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The structural damage repair of composite material is an important issue that needs to be addressed during the service life of composite materials. To investigate the effects of a scarf structure and scarf angle on the repair quality of composite material, this paper proposes a mixed-scarf (MS) repair structure that combines ramped-scarf (RS) and stepped-scarf (SS) repair structures. The effect of the repair structure on the mechanical properties was analyzed, as well as the quality of the adhesive interface. The results show that at a scarf angle of 10°, the repair efficiency and the quality of adhesive interface are better than that of scarf angles of 20° and 30°. At a scarf angle of 10°, the recovery degree of the flexural strength of the MS repair structure is 79.72%, which is 6.77% and 38.24% higher than that of the RS and SS repair structures, respectively. However, in terms of flexural modulus, regardless of repair structure, the flexural modulus is highest at a scarf angle of 20°. Furthermore, the impact strength of the MS repair structure is approximately 87.60% that of the RS repair structure; additionally, it exhibits an increase of 45.83% compared to the SS repair structure. Overall, the quality of the adhesive interface for the RS and MS repair structures is similar and better than that of the SS repair structure. In conclusion, the MS repair structure is well suited for small-angle scarf repairs, whereas the RS repair structure is more appropriate for large-angle repairs; in contrast, the SS repair structure demonstrates the least effective performance in terms of repair outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20416,"journal":{"name":"Polymers","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Repair Interface Structure on Mechanical Properties of Scarf Repair for Composite Laminate Plates.\",\"authors\":\"Kaomin Zhang, Zhenhu Miao, Haiting Xia, Xiaoyu Yang, Fenglin Tian, Yinghui Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/polym17040511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The structural damage repair of composite material is an important issue that needs to be addressed during the service life of composite materials. To investigate the effects of a scarf structure and scarf angle on the repair quality of composite material, this paper proposes a mixed-scarf (MS) repair structure that combines ramped-scarf (RS) and stepped-scarf (SS) repair structures. The effect of the repair structure on the mechanical properties was analyzed, as well as the quality of the adhesive interface. The results show that at a scarf angle of 10°, the repair efficiency and the quality of adhesive interface are better than that of scarf angles of 20° and 30°. At a scarf angle of 10°, the recovery degree of the flexural strength of the MS repair structure is 79.72%, which is 6.77% and 38.24% higher than that of the RS and SS repair structures, respectively. However, in terms of flexural modulus, regardless of repair structure, the flexural modulus is highest at a scarf angle of 20°. Furthermore, the impact strength of the MS repair structure is approximately 87.60% that of the RS repair structure; additionally, it exhibits an increase of 45.83% compared to the SS repair structure. Overall, the quality of the adhesive interface for the RS and MS repair structures is similar and better than that of the SS repair structure. In conclusion, the MS repair structure is well suited for small-angle scarf repairs, whereas the RS repair structure is more appropriate for large-angle repairs; in contrast, the SS repair structure demonstrates the least effective performance in terms of repair outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polymers\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858822/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polymers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17040511\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLYMER SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17040511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复合材料结构损伤修复是复合材料使用寿命期内需要解决的重要问题。为了研究围巾结构和围巾角度对复合材料修复质量的影响,本文提出了一种混合围巾(MS)修复结构,该结构将坡道围巾(RS)和阶梯式围巾(SS)修复结构相结合。分析了修复结构对复合材料力学性能和粘接界面质量的影响。结果表明,当围带角为10°时,粘接界面的修复效率和质量均优于围带角为20°和30°时;在围巾角为10°时,MS修复结构的抗弯强度恢复程度为79.72%,分别比RS和SS修复结构高6.77%和38.24%。但在抗弯模量方面,无论何种修复结构,在围巾角为20°时抗弯模量最高。MS修复结构的冲击强度约为RS修复结构的87.60%;与SS修复结构相比,增加了45.83%。总体而言,RS和MS修复结构的粘接界面质量相似且优于SS修复结构。综上所述,MS修复结构更适合小角度的围巾修复,RS修复结构更适合大角度的围巾修复;相比之下,SS修复结构在修复结果方面表现出最不有效的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Repair Interface Structure on Mechanical Properties of Scarf Repair for Composite Laminate Plates.

The structural damage repair of composite material is an important issue that needs to be addressed during the service life of composite materials. To investigate the effects of a scarf structure and scarf angle on the repair quality of composite material, this paper proposes a mixed-scarf (MS) repair structure that combines ramped-scarf (RS) and stepped-scarf (SS) repair structures. The effect of the repair structure on the mechanical properties was analyzed, as well as the quality of the adhesive interface. The results show that at a scarf angle of 10°, the repair efficiency and the quality of adhesive interface are better than that of scarf angles of 20° and 30°. At a scarf angle of 10°, the recovery degree of the flexural strength of the MS repair structure is 79.72%, which is 6.77% and 38.24% higher than that of the RS and SS repair structures, respectively. However, in terms of flexural modulus, regardless of repair structure, the flexural modulus is highest at a scarf angle of 20°. Furthermore, the impact strength of the MS repair structure is approximately 87.60% that of the RS repair structure; additionally, it exhibits an increase of 45.83% compared to the SS repair structure. Overall, the quality of the adhesive interface for the RS and MS repair structures is similar and better than that of the SS repair structure. In conclusion, the MS repair structure is well suited for small-angle scarf repairs, whereas the RS repair structure is more appropriate for large-angle repairs; in contrast, the SS repair structure demonstrates the least effective performance in terms of repair outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polymers
Polymers POLYMER SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
4697
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Polymers (ISSN 2073-4360) is an international, open access journal of polymer science. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Polymers provides an interdisciplinary forum for publishing papers which advance the fields of (i) polymerization methods, (ii) theory, simulation, and modeling, (iii) understanding of new physical phenomena, (iv) advances in characterization techniques, and (v) harnessing of self-assembly and biological strategies for producing complex multifunctional structures.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Alshabanah et al. Elastic Nanofibrous Membranes for Medical and Personal Protection Applications: Manufacturing, Anti-COVID-19, and Anti-Colistin Resistant Bacteria Evaluation. Polymers 2021, 13, 3987. Bioethanol from Miscanthus × giganteus: A Comparative Study of Different Pretreatment Technologies. Influence of Self-Adhesive Resin Composite Deep Marginal Elevation on the Sealing Ability of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic Inlays: An In Vitro Study. Assessment of Surface Roughness and Bacterial Adhesion of Occlusal Splints Fabricated with Different Layer Thicknesses, Polishing Techniques and Build Orientations. Electrospinning of Polycaprolactone Membranes Using Green Solvents for Organ-on-a-Chip Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1