IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural Water Management Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109398
Thainná Waldburger , Thomas Anken , Marianne Cockburn , Achim Walter , Matthias Hatt , Camilo Chiang , Hassan-Roland Nasser
{"title":"Automated irrigation of apple trees based on dendrometer sensors","authors":"Thainná Waldburger ,&nbsp;Thomas Anken ,&nbsp;Marianne Cockburn ,&nbsp;Achim Walter ,&nbsp;Matthias Hatt ,&nbsp;Camilo Chiang ,&nbsp;Hassan-Roland Nasser","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the efficiency of an automated irrigation system using dendrometer sensors in apple orchards and compares it to a standard grower commercial irrigation approach based on soil moisture sensors. An algorithm was developed to balance daily stem shrinkage (water loss) and expansion (water uptake), aiming for a stable dendrometer signal. The dendrometer-based irrigation system (DENDRO) significantly reduced water use—by 38 % in 2022 and more than 45 % in 2023—while maintaining yields similar to those of the soil moisture-based system (SOIL). The DENDRO responded quite well to plant water stress, as indicated by stem water potential (WP). Although the tested algorithm proved to be efficient, the results also indicated the potential for optimization. One example is shortening the averaging period used to calculate stem recovery (R<sub>Δ</sub>). The SOIL method was effective in fruit production but proved to be less efficient in reflecting water needs. Alternative approaches, including FAO-based irrigation (FAO) and a linear regression model combining dendrometer parameters and climatic data (MODEL), were also assessed. The FAO method tended to overestimate water requirements, while the MODEL method showed promise for dynamic irrigation adjustment based on climatic conditions and dendrometer values. Overall, the findings highlight the advantage of integrating plant-based sensors, such as dendrometers, for more precise irrigation management in orchard systems, leading to more sustainable water use without compromising crop yield.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 109398"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742500112X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了苹果园中使用测深仪传感器的自动灌溉系统的效率,并将其与基于土壤水分传感器的标准种植者商业灌溉方法进行了比较。研究开发了一种算法来平衡每天茎干的收缩(失水)和膨胀(吸水),目的是获得稳定的树枝仪信号。基于土壤水分传感器的灌溉系统(DENDRO)在2022年显著减少了38%的用水量,在2023年减少了45%以上,同时保持了与基于土壤水分传感器的灌溉系统(SOIL)相似的产量。根据茎干水势(WP)显示,DENDRO 对植物水分胁迫反应良好。尽管测试的算法被证明是高效的,但结果也显示了优化的潜力。其中一个例子是缩短用于计算茎干恢复能力(RΔ)的平均周期。SOIL 方法对果实产量很有效,但在反映需水量方面效率较低。还对其他方法进行了评估,包括基于粮农组织的灌溉方法(FAO)和结合测枝仪参数和气候数据的线性回归模型(MODEL)。粮农组织灌溉方法往往会高估需水量,而 MODEL 方法则有望根据气候条件和测水仪数值对灌溉进行动态调整。总之,研究结果凸显了在果园系统中整合测深仪等植物传感器进行更精确灌溉管理的优势,从而在不影响作物产量的情况下实现更可持续的水资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automated irrigation of apple trees based on dendrometer sensors
This study evaluates the efficiency of an automated irrigation system using dendrometer sensors in apple orchards and compares it to a standard grower commercial irrigation approach based on soil moisture sensors. An algorithm was developed to balance daily stem shrinkage (water loss) and expansion (water uptake), aiming for a stable dendrometer signal. The dendrometer-based irrigation system (DENDRO) significantly reduced water use—by 38 % in 2022 and more than 45 % in 2023—while maintaining yields similar to those of the soil moisture-based system (SOIL). The DENDRO responded quite well to plant water stress, as indicated by stem water potential (WP). Although the tested algorithm proved to be efficient, the results also indicated the potential for optimization. One example is shortening the averaging period used to calculate stem recovery (RΔ). The SOIL method was effective in fruit production but proved to be less efficient in reflecting water needs. Alternative approaches, including FAO-based irrigation (FAO) and a linear regression model combining dendrometer parameters and climatic data (MODEL), were also assessed. The FAO method tended to overestimate water requirements, while the MODEL method showed promise for dynamic irrigation adjustment based on climatic conditions and dendrometer values. Overall, the findings highlight the advantage of integrating plant-based sensors, such as dendrometers, for more precise irrigation management in orchard systems, leading to more sustainable water use without compromising crop yield.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing subsurface pipe layout by considering leaching efficiency of major salt ions to improve crop coverage using HYDRUS-2D Optimizing the ratios of ridge-furrow mulching patterns and urea types improve the resource use efficiency and yield of broomcorn millet on the Loess Plateau of China Effect of water-saving technologies on nitrogen losses in rice fields: A meta-analysis Improving synergy of the water-agriculture-ecology system in arid areas using a novel co-optimization model Night transpiration of peanut affects interspecific water complementarity and use efficiency in maize/peanut intercropping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1