阿托西班与安慰剂治疗早产儿(APOSTEL 8):多中心随机对照试验

Larissa I van der Windt, Job Klumper, Ruben G Duijnhoven, Marjolein Kok, Carrie Ris-Stalpers, Marjon A de Boer, Anton H van Kaam, Eva Pajkrt, Ben W Mol, Kate F Walker, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Joris A van der Post, Carolien Roos, Martijn A Oudijk
{"title":"阿托西班与安慰剂治疗早产儿(APOSTEL 8):多中心随机对照试验","authors":"Larissa I van der Windt, Job Klumper, Ruben G Duijnhoven, Marjolein Kok, Carrie Ris-Stalpers, Marjon A de Boer, Anton H van Kaam, Eva Pajkrt, Ben W Mol, Kate F Walker, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Joris A van der Post, Carolien Roos, Martijn A Oudijk","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00295-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Tocolytics are recommended in international guidelines as treatment for threatened preterm birth. Atosiban, an oxytocin receptor antagonist, is a registered tocolytic drug specifically indicated for the treatment of threatened preterm birth. Although tocolytics have been shown to delay birth, benefits on neonatal outcomes have not been demonstrated. In the APOSTEL 8 trial we aimed to assess superiority of tocolysis with atosiban compared with placebo in threatened preterm birth from 30 weeks and 0 days (30<sup>+0</sup> weeks) to 33<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation in improving neonatal morbidity and mortality.<h3>Methods</h3>This was an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, superiority trial conducted in 26 hospitals in the Netherlands, England, and Ireland. After written informed consent, women aged 18 years or older with a singleton or twin pregnancy with threatened preterm birth from 30<sup>+0</sup> to 33<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation were randomly assigned (stratified by centre, 1:1 ratio) to intravenous atosiban or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal mortality (stillbirth and death until 28 days postpartum) and six severe neonatal morbidities. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Treatment effect was estimated as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. This trial was prospectively registered at EudraCT (2017-001007-72) and the Netherlands Trial Registry (NL-OMON54673), and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Dec 4, 2017, and July 24, 2023, a total of 755 participants were randomly assigned, of whom 752 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (atosiban n=375, placebo n=377). The primary outcome occurred in 37 (8%) of 449 infants in the atosiban group and 40 (9%) of 435 in the placebo group (RR 0·90 [95% CI 0·58–1·40]). There were three (0·7%) and four (0·9%) infants who died, respectively (RR 0·73 [0·16–3·23]); all deaths were deemed unlikely to be related to the study drug. Maternal adverse events did not differ between groups, and there were no maternal deaths.<h3>Interpretation</h3>We did not demonstrate superiority of atosiban over placebo in improving neonatal outcomes as treatment for threatened preterm birth from 30<sup>+0</sup> to 33<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation. As the primary goal of tocolysis should be improvement of neonatal outcomes, our outcomes question the standardised use of atosiban as treatment for threatened preterm birth from 30<sup>+0</sup> to 33<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation. Our findings should reduce practice variation across countries and will contribute to evidence-based treatment for patients with threatened preterm birth.<h3>Funding</h3>ZonMw.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atosiban versus placebo for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL 8): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Larissa I van der Windt, Job Klumper, Ruben G Duijnhoven, Marjolein Kok, Carrie Ris-Stalpers, Marjon A de Boer, Anton H van Kaam, Eva Pajkrt, Ben W Mol, Kate F Walker, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Joris A van der Post, Carolien Roos, Martijn A Oudijk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00295-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Tocolytics are recommended in international guidelines as treatment for threatened preterm birth. Atosiban, an oxytocin receptor antagonist, is a registered tocolytic drug specifically indicated for the treatment of threatened preterm birth. Although tocolytics have been shown to delay birth, benefits on neonatal outcomes have not been demonstrated. In the APOSTEL 8 trial we aimed to assess superiority of tocolysis with atosiban compared with placebo in threatened preterm birth from 30 weeks and 0 days (30<sup>+0</sup> weeks) to 33<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation in improving neonatal morbidity and mortality.<h3>Methods</h3>This was an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, superiority trial conducted in 26 hospitals in the Netherlands, England, and Ireland. After written informed consent, women aged 18 years or older with a singleton or twin pregnancy with threatened preterm birth from 30<sup>+0</sup> to 33<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation were randomly assigned (stratified by centre, 1:1 ratio) to intravenous atosiban or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal mortality (stillbirth and death until 28 days postpartum) and six severe neonatal morbidities. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Treatment effect was estimated as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. This trial was prospectively registered at EudraCT (2017-001007-72) and the Netherlands Trial Registry (NL-OMON54673), and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Dec 4, 2017, and July 24, 2023, a total of 755 participants were randomly assigned, of whom 752 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (atosiban n=375, placebo n=377). The primary outcome occurred in 37 (8%) of 449 infants in the atosiban group and 40 (9%) of 435 in the placebo group (RR 0·90 [95% CI 0·58–1·40]). There were three (0·7%) and four (0·9%) infants who died, respectively (RR 0·73 [0·16–3·23]); all deaths were deemed unlikely to be related to the study drug. Maternal adverse events did not differ between groups, and there were no maternal deaths.<h3>Interpretation</h3>We did not demonstrate superiority of atosiban over placebo in improving neonatal outcomes as treatment for threatened preterm birth from 30<sup>+0</sup> to 33<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation. As the primary goal of tocolysis should be improvement of neonatal outcomes, our outcomes question the standardised use of atosiban as treatment for threatened preterm birth from 30<sup>+0</sup> to 33<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation. Our findings should reduce practice variation across countries and will contribute to evidence-based treatment for patients with threatened preterm birth.<h3>Funding</h3>ZonMw.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00295-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00295-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际指南推荐使用抗早产药物治疗先兆早产。阿托西班是一种催产素受体拮抗剂,是一种注册的抗早产药物,专门用于治疗先兆早产。虽然抗早产药物已被证明可以延迟出生,但对新生儿结局的益处尚未得到证实。在APOSTEL 8试验中,我们旨在评估阿托西班与安慰剂相比,在妊娠30周0天(30+0周)至33+6周的先兆早产中,在改善新生儿发病率和死亡率方面的优越性。方法:这是一项国际性、多中心、随机、双盲、优势试验,在荷兰、英国和爱尔兰的26家医院进行。在获得书面知情同意后,年龄在18岁及以上的单胎或双胎妊娠(妊娠30+0至33+6周)并有早产危险的妇女被随机分配(按中心分层,1:1比例)静脉注射阿托西班或安慰剂。主要结局是围产期死亡率(死产和产后28天死亡)和6种严重新生儿发病率的综合。通过意向治疗进行分析。治疗效果以相对危险度(RR)估计,CI为95%。该试验已在EudraCT(2017-001007-72)和荷兰试验注册中心(NL-OMON54673)进行前瞻性注册,现已完成。在2017年12月4日至2023年7月24日期间,共有755名受试者被随机分配,其中752名受试者被纳入意向治疗分析(阿托西班n=375,安慰剂n=377)。阿托西班组449名婴儿中有37名(8%)出现主要结局,安慰剂组435名婴儿中有40名(9%)出现主要结局(RR = 0.90 [95% CI = 0.58 - 1.40])。死亡婴儿分别为3例(0.7%)和4例(0.9%)(RR = 0.73 [0.16 - 3.23]);所有的死亡都被认为不太可能与研究药物有关。产妇不良事件在两组之间没有差异,也没有产妇死亡。我们没有证明阿托西班治疗妊娠30+0至33+6周的先兆早产在改善新生儿结局方面优于安慰剂。由于产前溶栓的主要目标是改善新生儿结局,我们的研究结果对阿托西班作为妊娠30+0至33+6周的先兆早产治疗的标准化使用提出了质疑。我们的研究结果应该减少不同国家的实践差异,并将有助于对先兆早产患者进行循证治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Atosiban versus placebo for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL 8): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Background

Tocolytics are recommended in international guidelines as treatment for threatened preterm birth. Atosiban, an oxytocin receptor antagonist, is a registered tocolytic drug specifically indicated for the treatment of threatened preterm birth. Although tocolytics have been shown to delay birth, benefits on neonatal outcomes have not been demonstrated. In the APOSTEL 8 trial we aimed to assess superiority of tocolysis with atosiban compared with placebo in threatened preterm birth from 30 weeks and 0 days (30+0 weeks) to 33+6 weeks of gestation in improving neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Methods

This was an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, superiority trial conducted in 26 hospitals in the Netherlands, England, and Ireland. After written informed consent, women aged 18 years or older with a singleton or twin pregnancy with threatened preterm birth from 30+0 to 33+6 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned (stratified by centre, 1:1 ratio) to intravenous atosiban or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal mortality (stillbirth and death until 28 days postpartum) and six severe neonatal morbidities. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Treatment effect was estimated as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. This trial was prospectively registered at EudraCT (2017-001007-72) and the Netherlands Trial Registry (NL-OMON54673), and is complete.

Findings

Between Dec 4, 2017, and July 24, 2023, a total of 755 participants were randomly assigned, of whom 752 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (atosiban n=375, placebo n=377). The primary outcome occurred in 37 (8%) of 449 infants in the atosiban group and 40 (9%) of 435 in the placebo group (RR 0·90 [95% CI 0·58–1·40]). There were three (0·7%) and four (0·9%) infants who died, respectively (RR 0·73 [0·16–3·23]); all deaths were deemed unlikely to be related to the study drug. Maternal adverse events did not differ between groups, and there were no maternal deaths.

Interpretation

We did not demonstrate superiority of atosiban over placebo in improving neonatal outcomes as treatment for threatened preterm birth from 30+0 to 33+6 weeks of gestation. As the primary goal of tocolysis should be improvement of neonatal outcomes, our outcomes question the standardised use of atosiban as treatment for threatened preterm birth from 30+0 to 33+6 weeks of gestation. Our findings should reduce practice variation across countries and will contribute to evidence-based treatment for patients with threatened preterm birth.

Funding

ZonMw.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A WHO worth fighting for: the case for focused, ambitious reform Department of Error Patrizia Burra: an authority on liver disease and transplantation Pharmacological blood-pressure lowering for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and death across the full spectrum of chronic kidney disease severity: an individual-participant data meta-analysis. Semaglutide, weight loss, and cardiovascular outcomes in the SELECT trial - Authors' reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1