Matheus Silva Norberto, Germano Marcolino Putti, João Victor Gatto Torini, Tiago Rezende Figueira, Marcelo Papoti
{"title":"单腿伸膝测力计上的全力间歇运动:对不同阻力的机械和生理反应。","authors":"Matheus Silva Norberto, Germano Marcolino Putti, João Victor Gatto Torini, Tiago Rezende Figueira, Marcelo Papoti","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2472265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate mechanical and physiological responses to all-out high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions (10 maximal efforts of 30 seconds each with 4 min of rest) performed against different resistance forces on a one-leg knee extension ergometer. Eighteen men conducted an incremental test to determine the resistance associated with its maximal power (R<sub>max</sub>), followed by all-out HIIT sessions at 120%, 160%, and 200% of R<sub>max</sub>, while oxygen consumption and neuromuscular function were measured. Mechanical power output was higher during the session at 200% of R<sub>max</sub> compared to the other sessions (p < 0.001), but its absolute anaerobic energy contribution was similar to that at 160% of R<sub>max</sub>. Notably, the all-out efforts at 200% R<sub>max</sub> led to inconsistent kicking cadence and some participants were unable to complete the session. Therefore, 160% R<sub>max</sub> was the highest suitable resistance force for a consistent all-out HIIT session on a knee extension ergometer.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All-out intermittent exercise on a one-leg knee extension ergometer: mechanical and physiological responses to different resistance forces.\",\"authors\":\"Matheus Silva Norberto, Germano Marcolino Putti, João Victor Gatto Torini, Tiago Rezende Figueira, Marcelo Papoti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2472265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate mechanical and physiological responses to all-out high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions (10 maximal efforts of 30 seconds each with 4 min of rest) performed against different resistance forces on a one-leg knee extension ergometer. Eighteen men conducted an incremental test to determine the resistance associated with its maximal power (R<sub>max</sub>), followed by all-out HIIT sessions at 120%, 160%, and 200% of R<sub>max</sub>, while oxygen consumption and neuromuscular function were measured. Mechanical power output was higher during the session at 200% of R<sub>max</sub> compared to the other sessions (p < 0.001), but its absolute anaerobic energy contribution was similar to that at 160% of R<sub>max</sub>. Notably, the all-out efforts at 200% R<sub>max</sub> led to inconsistent kicking cadence and some participants were unable to complete the session. Therefore, 160% R<sub>max</sub> was the highest suitable resistance force for a consistent all-out HIIT session on a knee extension ergometer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2472265\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2472265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
All-out intermittent exercise on a one-leg knee extension ergometer: mechanical and physiological responses to different resistance forces.
This study aimed to evaluate mechanical and physiological responses to all-out high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions (10 maximal efforts of 30 seconds each with 4 min of rest) performed against different resistance forces on a one-leg knee extension ergometer. Eighteen men conducted an incremental test to determine the resistance associated with its maximal power (Rmax), followed by all-out HIIT sessions at 120%, 160%, and 200% of Rmax, while oxygen consumption and neuromuscular function were measured. Mechanical power output was higher during the session at 200% of Rmax compared to the other sessions (p < 0.001), but its absolute anaerobic energy contribution was similar to that at 160% of Rmax. Notably, the all-out efforts at 200% Rmax led to inconsistent kicking cadence and some participants were unable to complete the session. Therefore, 160% Rmax was the highest suitable resistance force for a consistent all-out HIIT session on a knee extension ergometer.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.