单腿伸膝测力计上的全力间歇运动:对不同阻力的机械和生理反应。

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1080/00140139.2025.2472265
Matheus Silva Norberto, Germano Marcolino Putti, João Victor Gatto Torini, Tiago Rezende Figueira, Marcelo Papoti
{"title":"单腿伸膝测力计上的全力间歇运动:对不同阻力的机械和生理反应。","authors":"Matheus Silva Norberto, Germano Marcolino Putti, João Victor Gatto Torini, Tiago Rezende Figueira, Marcelo Papoti","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2472265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate mechanical and physiological responses to all-out high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions (10 maximal efforts of 30 seconds each with 4 min of rest) performed against different resistance forces on a one-leg knee extension ergometer. Eighteen men conducted an incremental test to determine the resistance associated with its maximal power (R<sub>max</sub>), followed by all-out HIIT sessions at 120%, 160%, and 200% of R<sub>max</sub>, while oxygen consumption and neuromuscular function were measured. Mechanical power output was higher during the session at 200% of R<sub>max</sub> compared to the other sessions (p < 0.001), but its absolute anaerobic energy contribution was similar to that at 160% of R<sub>max</sub>. Notably, the all-out efforts at 200% R<sub>max</sub> led to inconsistent kicking cadence and some participants were unable to complete the session. Therefore, 160% R<sub>max</sub> was the highest suitable resistance force for a consistent all-out HIIT session on a knee extension ergometer.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All-out intermittent exercise on a one-leg knee extension ergometer: mechanical and physiological responses to different resistance forces.\",\"authors\":\"Matheus Silva Norberto, Germano Marcolino Putti, João Victor Gatto Torini, Tiago Rezende Figueira, Marcelo Papoti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2472265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate mechanical and physiological responses to all-out high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions (10 maximal efforts of 30 seconds each with 4 min of rest) performed against different resistance forces on a one-leg knee extension ergometer. Eighteen men conducted an incremental test to determine the resistance associated with its maximal power (R<sub>max</sub>), followed by all-out HIIT sessions at 120%, 160%, and 200% of R<sub>max</sub>, while oxygen consumption and neuromuscular function were measured. Mechanical power output was higher during the session at 200% of R<sub>max</sub> compared to the other sessions (p < 0.001), but its absolute anaerobic energy contribution was similar to that at 160% of R<sub>max</sub>. Notably, the all-out efforts at 200% R<sub>max</sub> led to inconsistent kicking cadence and some participants were unable to complete the session. Therefore, 160% R<sub>max</sub> was the highest suitable resistance force for a consistent all-out HIIT session on a knee extension ergometer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2472265\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2472265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
All-out intermittent exercise on a one-leg knee extension ergometer: mechanical and physiological responses to different resistance forces.

This study aimed to evaluate mechanical and physiological responses to all-out high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions (10 maximal efforts of 30 seconds each with 4 min of rest) performed against different resistance forces on a one-leg knee extension ergometer. Eighteen men conducted an incremental test to determine the resistance associated with its maximal power (Rmax), followed by all-out HIIT sessions at 120%, 160%, and 200% of Rmax, while oxygen consumption and neuromuscular function were measured. Mechanical power output was higher during the session at 200% of Rmax compared to the other sessions (p < 0.001), but its absolute anaerobic energy contribution was similar to that at 160% of Rmax. Notably, the all-out efforts at 200% Rmax led to inconsistent kicking cadence and some participants were unable to complete the session. Therefore, 160% Rmax was the highest suitable resistance force for a consistent all-out HIIT session on a knee extension ergometer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
期刊最新文献
Ageing in the digital age: what drives virtual reality technology adoption among older adults? Proposal of cognitive bias (CB)-incorporated SHEL model to prevent disasters or crashes based on analyses of organisational failures in risk and crisis management in the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Use of wearable sensors for continuous field monitoring of upper arm and trunk postures among construction workers. All-out intermittent exercise on a one-leg knee extension ergometer: mechanical and physiological responses to different resistance forces. The impact of inter-limb leg lean tissue mass asymmetry on stair climb performance in career firefighters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1