IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Chemical Research in Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c0042110.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00421
Dmitriy M. Makarov*, Alexander A. Ksenofontov and Yury A. Budkov, 
{"title":"Consensus Modeling for Predicting Chemical Binding to Transthyretin as the Winning Solution of the Tox24 Challenge","authors":"Dmitriy M. Makarov*,&nbsp;Alexander A. Ksenofontov and Yury A. Budkov,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c0042110.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The utilization of predictive methodologies for the assessment of toxicological properties represents an alternative approach that facilitates the identification of safe compounds while concurrently reducing the financial costs associated with the process. The objective of the Tox24 Challenge was to assess the progress in computational methods for predicting the activity of chemical binding to transthyretin (TTR). In order to fulfill the requirements of this task, the data set, measured by the Environmental Protection Agency, consisted of 1512 chemical substances of diverse nature. This paper describes the model that won the Tox24 Challenge and the steps taken for its further improvement. The Transformer convolutional neural network (CNN) model achieved the best performance as a standalone solution. Meanwhile, a multitask model built on a graph CNN, trained using 11 additional acute systemic toxicity data sets with increased weighting on the TTR binding activity, showed comparable results on the blind test set. The winning solution was a consensus model consisting of two catBoost models with OEstate and Mold2 descriptor sets, as well as two transformer-based models. The improvement of this solution involved adding a fifth model based on multitask learning using the graph CNN method, which led to a reduction in RMSE on the blind test set to 20.3%. The winning model was developed using the OCHEM web platform and is available online at https://ochem.eu/article/162082.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":"38 3","pages":"392–399 392–399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用预测方法评估毒理学特性是一种替代方法,有助于确定安全的化合物,同时降低与此过程相关的财务成本。Tox24 挑战赛的目标是评估预测化学物质与转甲状腺素(TTR)结合活性的计算方法的进展情况。为了满足这项任务的要求,由环境保护局测定的数据集包括 1512 种不同性质的化学物质。本文介绍了在 Tox24 挑战赛中获胜的模型及其进一步改进的步骤。变压器卷积神经网络(CNN)模型作为独立解决方案取得了最佳性能。与此同时,一个基于图 CNN 的多任务模型在盲测试集上取得了不相上下的结果,该模型使用 11 个额外的急性全身毒性数据集进行训练,并增加了 TTR 结合活性的权重。获胜方案是一个共识模型,由两个使用 OEstate 和 Mold2 描述集的 catBoost 模型以及两个基于变压器的模型组成。该方案的改进包括增加第五个基于多任务学习的模型,使用图 CNN 方法,从而将盲测试集上的 RMSE 降低到 20.3%。获奖模型是利用 OCHEM 网络平台开发的,可在 https://ochem.eu/article/162082 上在线查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consensus Modeling for Predicting Chemical Binding to Transthyretin as the Winning Solution of the Tox24 Challenge

The utilization of predictive methodologies for the assessment of toxicological properties represents an alternative approach that facilitates the identification of safe compounds while concurrently reducing the financial costs associated with the process. The objective of the Tox24 Challenge was to assess the progress in computational methods for predicting the activity of chemical binding to transthyretin (TTR). In order to fulfill the requirements of this task, the data set, measured by the Environmental Protection Agency, consisted of 1512 chemical substances of diverse nature. This paper describes the model that won the Tox24 Challenge and the steps taken for its further improvement. The Transformer convolutional neural network (CNN) model achieved the best performance as a standalone solution. Meanwhile, a multitask model built on a graph CNN, trained using 11 additional acute systemic toxicity data sets with increased weighting on the TTR binding activity, showed comparable results on the blind test set. The winning solution was a consensus model consisting of two catBoost models with OEstate and Mold2 descriptor sets, as well as two transformer-based models. The improvement of this solution involved adding a fifth model based on multitask learning using the graph CNN method, which led to a reduction in RMSE on the blind test set to 20.3%. The winning model was developed using the OCHEM web platform and is available online at https://ochem.eu/article/162082.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
期刊最新文献
Quantification of Flavors, Volatile Organic Compounds, Tobacco Markers, and Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines in Heated Tobacco Products and Their Mainstream Aerosol. Nanoparticle-Mediated Embryotoxicity: Mechanisms of Chemical Toxicity and Implications for Biological Development. Systematic Investigation of CYP3A4 Using Side-by-Side Comparisons of Apo, Active Site, and Allosteric-Bound States. Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1