针对重叠短开放阅读框和基因组邻近区的突变约束分析工作流程。

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY BMC Genomics Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1186/s12864-025-11444-w
Martin Danner, Matthias Begemann, Florian Kraft, Miriam Elbracht, Ingo Kurth, Jeremias Krause
{"title":"针对重叠短开放阅读框和基因组邻近区的突变约束分析工作流程。","authors":"Martin Danner, Matthias Begemann, Florian Kraft, Miriam Elbracht, Ingo Kurth, Jeremias Krause","doi":"10.1186/s12864-025-11444-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the dark genome is a priority task following the complete sequencing of the human genome. Short open reading frames (sORFs) are a group of largely unexplored elements of the dark genome with the potential for being translated into microproteins. The definitive number of coding and regulatory sORFs is not known, however they could account for up to 1-2% of the human genome. This corresponds to an order of magnitude in the range of canonical coding genes. For a few sORFs a clinical relevance has already been demonstrated, but for the majority of potential sORFs the biological function remains unclear. A major limitation in predicting their disease relevance using large-scale genomic data is the fact that no population-level constraint metrics for genetic variants in sORFs are yet available. To overcome this, we used the recently released gnomAD 4.0 dataset and analyzed the constraint of a consensus set of sORFs and their genomic neighbors. We demonstrate that sORFs are mostly embedded into a moderately constrained genomic context, but within the gencode dataset we identified a subset of highly constrained sORFs comparable to highly constrained canonical genes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9030,"journal":{"name":"BMC Genomics","volume":"26 1","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutational constraint analysis workflow for overlapping short open reading frames and genomic neighbors.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Danner, Matthias Begemann, Florian Kraft, Miriam Elbracht, Ingo Kurth, Jeremias Krause\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12864-025-11444-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the dark genome is a priority task following the complete sequencing of the human genome. Short open reading frames (sORFs) are a group of largely unexplored elements of the dark genome with the potential for being translated into microproteins. The definitive number of coding and regulatory sORFs is not known, however they could account for up to 1-2% of the human genome. This corresponds to an order of magnitude in the range of canonical coding genes. For a few sORFs a clinical relevance has already been demonstrated, but for the majority of potential sORFs the biological function remains unclear. A major limitation in predicting their disease relevance using large-scale genomic data is the fact that no population-level constraint metrics for genetic variants in sORFs are yet available. To overcome this, we used the recently released gnomAD 4.0 dataset and analyzed the constraint of a consensus set of sORFs and their genomic neighbors. We demonstrate that sORFs are mostly embedded into a moderately constrained genomic context, but within the gencode dataset we identified a subset of highly constrained sORFs comparable to highly constrained canonical genes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Genomics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909976/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-11444-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-11444-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mutational constraint analysis workflow for overlapping short open reading frames and genomic neighbors.

Understanding the dark genome is a priority task following the complete sequencing of the human genome. Short open reading frames (sORFs) are a group of largely unexplored elements of the dark genome with the potential for being translated into microproteins. The definitive number of coding and regulatory sORFs is not known, however they could account for up to 1-2% of the human genome. This corresponds to an order of magnitude in the range of canonical coding genes. For a few sORFs a clinical relevance has already been demonstrated, but for the majority of potential sORFs the biological function remains unclear. A major limitation in predicting their disease relevance using large-scale genomic data is the fact that no population-level constraint metrics for genetic variants in sORFs are yet available. To overcome this, we used the recently released gnomAD 4.0 dataset and analyzed the constraint of a consensus set of sORFs and their genomic neighbors. We demonstrate that sORFs are mostly embedded into a moderately constrained genomic context, but within the gencode dataset we identified a subset of highly constrained sORFs comparable to highly constrained canonical genes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
相关文献
二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩
IF 8.9 1区 医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim
具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病
IF 3.2 3区 医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939
Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro
封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键
IF 3.4 4区 生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201
Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo
来源期刊
BMC Genomics
BMC Genomics 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
769
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics. BMC Genomics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
期刊最新文献
Genomic-transcriptomic analysis identifies the Syrian hamster as a superior animal model for human diseases. Application of genomic tools to study and potentially improve the upper thermal tolerance of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Genomic insights into the genetic diversity and genetic basis of body height in endangered Chinese Ningqiang ponies. Identification and functional validation of a novel FBN1 variant in a Marfan syndrome family using a zebrafish model. Comparative mitogenomic analysis of Chinese cavefish Triplophysa (Cypriniformes: Nemacheilidae): novel gene tandem duplication and evolutionary implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1