K Steinhauer, A Mecklinger, A D Friederici, M Meyer
{"title":"[概率和策略:处理句法异常的事件相关潜力研究]。","authors":"K Steinhauer, A Mecklinger, A D Friederici, M Meyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Syntactic ambiguities requiring additional processing usually elicit positive going waveforms with onset latencies between 300 and 600 ms in the event-related potential (ERP). It is still unclear to what extent these components can be viewed either (a) as language specific in nature or (b) as members of the domain-unspecific P300 family of components. The present study investigates this question by means of probability manipulations applied to German sentences with subject-object ambiguities. Non-preferred object-subject (OS) word order requires structural revisions whereas the initially preferred subject-object (SO) word order does not. In the present experiment, the proportions of OS and SO structures were varied across experimental blocks (i.e., .25/.75 vs. .75/.25). The data of 20 participants reveal that ERP components were predominantly influenced when the subjects were explicitly informed about the actual proportions before each single block. In this case an early frontal positive component at about 400 ms and a subsequent posterior positivity were elicited by rare sentence structures irrespective of word order, suggesting that sentence processing was under strategic control. Conversely, participants that were not informed about sentence proportions showed larger positivities to the unpreferred OS sentences. Probability manipulations did not affect this pattern significantly. The data suggest that positivities evoked by syntactic ambiguities respond differently to probability manipulations than the P300 component.</p>","PeriodicalId":79386,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","volume":"44 2","pages":"305-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Probability and strategy: an event-related potential study of processing syntactic anomalies].\",\"authors\":\"K Steinhauer, A Mecklinger, A D Friederici, M Meyer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Syntactic ambiguities requiring additional processing usually elicit positive going waveforms with onset latencies between 300 and 600 ms in the event-related potential (ERP). It is still unclear to what extent these components can be viewed either (a) as language specific in nature or (b) as members of the domain-unspecific P300 family of components. The present study investigates this question by means of probability manipulations applied to German sentences with subject-object ambiguities. Non-preferred object-subject (OS) word order requires structural revisions whereas the initially preferred subject-object (SO) word order does not. In the present experiment, the proportions of OS and SO structures were varied across experimental blocks (i.e., .25/.75 vs. .75/.25). The data of 20 participants reveal that ERP components were predominantly influenced when the subjects were explicitly informed about the actual proportions before each single block. In this case an early frontal positive component at about 400 ms and a subsequent posterior positivity were elicited by rare sentence structures irrespective of word order, suggesting that sentence processing was under strategic control. Conversely, participants that were not informed about sentence proportions showed larger positivities to the unpreferred OS sentences. Probability manipulations did not affect this pattern significantly. The data suggest that positivities evoked by syntactic ambiguities respond differently to probability manipulations than the P300 component.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"305-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
需要额外处理的句法歧义通常会在事件相关电位(ERP)中引发300 - 600ms的正向波形。目前还不清楚这些组件在多大程度上可以被视为(a)在本质上是特定于语言的,或者(b)作为不特定于领域的P300组件家族的成员。本研究通过概率操作对德语主宾歧义句进行了研究。非首选的主-客体(OS)语序需要结构上的修改,而最初首选的主-客体(SO)语序则不需要。在本实验中,OS和SO结构的比例在不同的实验块中是不同的(即0.25 /。75 vs. 75/.25)。20名参与者的数据显示,当受试者在每个单独的块之前被明确告知实际比例时,ERP组件主要受到影响。在这种情况下,与词序无关的罕见句子结构在大约400毫秒时诱发了早期正面成分和随后的后置正面成分,这表明句子加工受到策略控制。相反,没有被告知句子比例的参与者对不喜欢的OS句子表现出更大的积极性。概率操作对这种模式没有显著影响。数据表明,句法歧义诱发的积极性对概率操纵的反应不同于P300成分。
[Probability and strategy: an event-related potential study of processing syntactic anomalies].
Syntactic ambiguities requiring additional processing usually elicit positive going waveforms with onset latencies between 300 and 600 ms in the event-related potential (ERP). It is still unclear to what extent these components can be viewed either (a) as language specific in nature or (b) as members of the domain-unspecific P300 family of components. The present study investigates this question by means of probability manipulations applied to German sentences with subject-object ambiguities. Non-preferred object-subject (OS) word order requires structural revisions whereas the initially preferred subject-object (SO) word order does not. In the present experiment, the proportions of OS and SO structures were varied across experimental blocks (i.e., .25/.75 vs. .75/.25). The data of 20 participants reveal that ERP components were predominantly influenced when the subjects were explicitly informed about the actual proportions before each single block. In this case an early frontal positive component at about 400 ms and a subsequent posterior positivity were elicited by rare sentence structures irrespective of word order, suggesting that sentence processing was under strategic control. Conversely, participants that were not informed about sentence proportions showed larger positivities to the unpreferred OS sentences. Probability manipulations did not affect this pattern significantly. The data suggest that positivities evoked by syntactic ambiguities respond differently to probability manipulations than the P300 component.