[心理物理学的两刺激-两选择范式:范围-频率模型与适应水平理论的比较]。

K Sander, V Sarris
{"title":"[心理物理学的两刺激-两选择范式:范围-频率模型与适应水平理论的比较]。","authors":"K Sander,&nbsp;V Sarris","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The predictions provided by the range-frequency model and the adaptation-level theory were compared in respect of size judgments in an averbal two-category experiment. Squares of different sizes were presented in two different frequency distributions. After a two stimulus-two choice training, in which the subjects (N = 64) learned to which of the two response categories a relative small or large square belonged, a generalization context-series test followed. The two test series represented the two different frequency distributions used (the arithmetic mean was either smaller or larger than the median or midpoint). The percentage of large responses was registered. Furthermore, to investigate which experimental design would be appropriate for this research paradigm, the study was carried out using both a between-subjects and a within-subjects design. For the two experimental designs, the results pointed to a confirmation of the predictions provided by the adaptation-level theory (D. R. Thomas, 1993) but not the range-frequency model (Parducci, 1983, 1995).</p>","PeriodicalId":79386,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","volume":"44 3","pages":"431-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Two-stimulus--two choice paradigm for psychophysics: range-frequency model and adaptation level theory in comparison].\",\"authors\":\"K Sander,&nbsp;V Sarris\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The predictions provided by the range-frequency model and the adaptation-level theory were compared in respect of size judgments in an averbal two-category experiment. Squares of different sizes were presented in two different frequency distributions. After a two stimulus-two choice training, in which the subjects (N = 64) learned to which of the two response categories a relative small or large square belonged, a generalization context-series test followed. The two test series represented the two different frequency distributions used (the arithmetic mean was either smaller or larger than the median or midpoint). The percentage of large responses was registered. Furthermore, to investigate which experimental design would be appropriate for this research paradigm, the study was carried out using both a between-subjects and a within-subjects design. For the two experimental designs, the results pointed to a confirmation of the predictions provided by the adaptation-level theory (D. R. Thomas, 1993) but not the range-frequency model (Parducci, 1983, 1995).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"431-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在两类实验中,比较了距离-频率模型和适应水平理论对大小判断的预测结果。在两种不同的频率分布中呈现不同大小的平方。在两个刺激-两个选择训练之后,受试者(N = 64)学习了相对较小或较大的正方形属于两个反应类别中的哪一个,随后进行了泛化上下文系列测试。两个检验序列表示使用的两种不同的频率分布(算术平均值小于或大于中位数或中点)。记录了大回复的百分比。此外,为了研究哪种实验设计适合这种研究范式,研究采用了受试者之间和受试者内部设计。对于这两个实验设计,结果都证实了适应水平理论(D. R. Thomas, 1993)提供的预测,但没有证实距离-频率模型(Parducci, 1983, 1995)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Two-stimulus--two choice paradigm for psychophysics: range-frequency model and adaptation level theory in comparison].

The predictions provided by the range-frequency model and the adaptation-level theory were compared in respect of size judgments in an averbal two-category experiment. Squares of different sizes were presented in two different frequency distributions. After a two stimulus-two choice training, in which the subjects (N = 64) learned to which of the two response categories a relative small or large square belonged, a generalization context-series test followed. The two test series represented the two different frequency distributions used (the arithmetic mean was either smaller or larger than the median or midpoint). The percentage of large responses was registered. Furthermore, to investigate which experimental design would be appropriate for this research paradigm, the study was carried out using both a between-subjects and a within-subjects design. For the two experimental designs, the results pointed to a confirmation of the predictions provided by the adaptation-level theory (D. R. Thomas, 1993) but not the range-frequency model (Parducci, 1983, 1995).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phonologische Bewusstheit und ihre Frderung bei Kindern mit Strungen der Sprachentwicklung Primre und Sekundre Kontrolle versus Hartnckige Zielverfolgung und Flexible Zielanpassung Entwicklung der Emotionsregulation bei 2- und 3jhrigen Mdchen Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zum Einfluss persönlicher Prioritätensetzungen auf Maße der Stimuluspräferenz: Erste empirische Befunde
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1