{"title":"[心理物理学的两刺激-两选择范式:范围-频率模型与适应水平理论的比较]。","authors":"K Sander, V Sarris","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The predictions provided by the range-frequency model and the adaptation-level theory were compared in respect of size judgments in an averbal two-category experiment. Squares of different sizes were presented in two different frequency distributions. After a two stimulus-two choice training, in which the subjects (N = 64) learned to which of the two response categories a relative small or large square belonged, a generalization context-series test followed. The two test series represented the two different frequency distributions used (the arithmetic mean was either smaller or larger than the median or midpoint). The percentage of large responses was registered. Furthermore, to investigate which experimental design would be appropriate for this research paradigm, the study was carried out using both a between-subjects and a within-subjects design. For the two experimental designs, the results pointed to a confirmation of the predictions provided by the adaptation-level theory (D. R. Thomas, 1993) but not the range-frequency model (Parducci, 1983, 1995).</p>","PeriodicalId":79386,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","volume":"44 3","pages":"431-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Two-stimulus--two choice paradigm for psychophysics: range-frequency model and adaptation level theory in comparison].\",\"authors\":\"K Sander, V Sarris\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The predictions provided by the range-frequency model and the adaptation-level theory were compared in respect of size judgments in an averbal two-category experiment. Squares of different sizes were presented in two different frequency distributions. After a two stimulus-two choice training, in which the subjects (N = 64) learned to which of the two response categories a relative small or large square belonged, a generalization context-series test followed. The two test series represented the two different frequency distributions used (the arithmetic mean was either smaller or larger than the median or midpoint). The percentage of large responses was registered. Furthermore, to investigate which experimental design would be appropriate for this research paradigm, the study was carried out using both a between-subjects and a within-subjects design. For the two experimental designs, the results pointed to a confirmation of the predictions provided by the adaptation-level theory (D. R. Thomas, 1993) but not the range-frequency model (Parducci, 1983, 1995).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"431-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在两类实验中,比较了距离-频率模型和适应水平理论对大小判断的预测结果。在两种不同的频率分布中呈现不同大小的平方。在两个刺激-两个选择训练之后,受试者(N = 64)学习了相对较小或较大的正方形属于两个反应类别中的哪一个,随后进行了泛化上下文系列测试。两个检验序列表示使用的两种不同的频率分布(算术平均值小于或大于中位数或中点)。记录了大回复的百分比。此外,为了研究哪种实验设计适合这种研究范式,研究采用了受试者之间和受试者内部设计。对于这两个实验设计,结果都证实了适应水平理论(D. R. Thomas, 1993)提供的预测,但没有证实距离-频率模型(Parducci, 1983, 1995)。
[Two-stimulus--two choice paradigm for psychophysics: range-frequency model and adaptation level theory in comparison].
The predictions provided by the range-frequency model and the adaptation-level theory were compared in respect of size judgments in an averbal two-category experiment. Squares of different sizes were presented in two different frequency distributions. After a two stimulus-two choice training, in which the subjects (N = 64) learned to which of the two response categories a relative small or large square belonged, a generalization context-series test followed. The two test series represented the two different frequency distributions used (the arithmetic mean was either smaller or larger than the median or midpoint). The percentage of large responses was registered. Furthermore, to investigate which experimental design would be appropriate for this research paradigm, the study was carried out using both a between-subjects and a within-subjects design. For the two experimental designs, the results pointed to a confirmation of the predictions provided by the adaptation-level theory (D. R. Thomas, 1993) but not the range-frequency model (Parducci, 1983, 1995).