冷、热、电、淡水、氢联合生产系统在寒冷气候下的技术经济评价

IF 5.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104262
Hassan Hajabdollahi, Amin Saleh, Vahid Ghamari, Mohammad Shafiey Dehaj
{"title":"冷、热、电、淡水、氢联合生产系统在寒冷气候下的技术经济评价","authors":"Hassan Hajabdollahi,&nbsp;Amin Saleh,&nbsp;Vahid Ghamari,&nbsp;Mohammad Shafiey Dehaj","doi":"10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Multi-generation plant is a decentralized, energy-efficient method of different type of energy production. Such a system can deliver multiple benefits and advantages compared to conventional energy production such as improvement in the efficiency, emission, cost and reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Technical-economic analysis of the combined cooling, heating, power, freshwater and hydrogen generation system (CCHPWH) are presented in this paper. Selecting the nominal power of prime movers, their numbers, the cooling capacity of absorption and electrical chillers, the heating capacity of auxiliary boiler, electric cooling ratio (the ratio of electrical chiller capacity to the cooling load demand), motive steam pressure, number of effects, motive steam flow rate, feed flow rate and 24 partial loads for the prime mover during in the year are considered as 35 design parameters. The optimization of the studied system was used by the genetic algorithm to obtain the minimum total annual cost (TAC) as an objective function. The total annual cost includes economic, energy and environmental parameters. It should be noted that selling/buying electricity to/from the grid is allowable in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Significant findings</h3><p>The optimum results showed 24.8% reduction in the total annual cost of the CCHPWH system using a gas engine as prime mover as compared with a gas turbine. In addition, the exergy efficiency of the cogeneration system in the optimal state for the prime mover of the gas turbine and the gas engine was obtained 31.21% and 45.58%, respectively. Finally, the optimal results in different cases were compared and results were discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104262"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical and economic evaluation of the combined production cooling, heating, power, freshwater, and hydrogen (CCHPWH) system in the cold climate\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Hajabdollahi,&nbsp;Amin Saleh,&nbsp;Vahid Ghamari,&nbsp;Mohammad Shafiey Dehaj\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Multi-generation plant is a decentralized, energy-efficient method of different type of energy production. Such a system can deliver multiple benefits and advantages compared to conventional energy production such as improvement in the efficiency, emission, cost and reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Technical-economic analysis of the combined cooling, heating, power, freshwater and hydrogen generation system (CCHPWH) are presented in this paper. Selecting the nominal power of prime movers, their numbers, the cooling capacity of absorption and electrical chillers, the heating capacity of auxiliary boiler, electric cooling ratio (the ratio of electrical chiller capacity to the cooling load demand), motive steam pressure, number of effects, motive steam flow rate, feed flow rate and 24 partial loads for the prime mover during in the year are considered as 35 design parameters. The optimization of the studied system was used by the genetic algorithm to obtain the minimum total annual cost (TAC) as an objective function. The total annual cost includes economic, energy and environmental parameters. It should be noted that selling/buying electricity to/from the grid is allowable in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Significant findings</h3><p>The optimum results showed 24.8% reduction in the total annual cost of the CCHPWH system using a gas engine as prime mover as compared with a gas turbine. In addition, the exergy efficiency of the cogeneration system in the optimal state for the prime mover of the gas turbine and the gas engine was obtained 31.21% and 45.58%, respectively. Finally, the optimal results in different cases were compared and results were discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187610702200061X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187610702200061X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

多联产电站是一种分散的、节能的不同类型能源生产方式。与传统能源生产相比,这种系统可以带来多种好处和优势,如效率、排放、成本和可靠性的提高。方法对冷、热、电、淡水、制氢联产系统进行了技术经济分析。选取原动机标称功率、数量、吸收式和电制冷机制冷量、辅助锅炉供热量、电制冷比(电制冷机制冷量与冷负荷需求之比)、原动机蒸汽压力、效应数、原动机蒸汽流量、给料流量、原动机全年24个分负荷作为35个设计参数。采用遗传算法对系统进行优化,以最小的年总成本(TAC)为目标函数。年度总成本包括经济、能源和环境参数。应该指出的是,在这项研究中,向电网出售/购买电力是允许的。优化结果表明,与燃气轮机相比,燃气发动机作为原动机的CCHPWH系统年总成本降低了24.8%。此外,燃气轮机原动机和燃气发动机原动机热电联产系统在最优状态下的火用效率分别为31.21%和45.58%。最后,对不同情况下的最优结果进行了比较和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technical and economic evaluation of the combined production cooling, heating, power, freshwater, and hydrogen (CCHPWH) system in the cold climate

Background

Multi-generation plant is a decentralized, energy-efficient method of different type of energy production. Such a system can deliver multiple benefits and advantages compared to conventional energy production such as improvement in the efficiency, emission, cost and reliability.

Methods

Technical-economic analysis of the combined cooling, heating, power, freshwater and hydrogen generation system (CCHPWH) are presented in this paper. Selecting the nominal power of prime movers, their numbers, the cooling capacity of absorption and electrical chillers, the heating capacity of auxiliary boiler, electric cooling ratio (the ratio of electrical chiller capacity to the cooling load demand), motive steam pressure, number of effects, motive steam flow rate, feed flow rate and 24 partial loads for the prime mover during in the year are considered as 35 design parameters. The optimization of the studied system was used by the genetic algorithm to obtain the minimum total annual cost (TAC) as an objective function. The total annual cost includes economic, energy and environmental parameters. It should be noted that selling/buying electricity to/from the grid is allowable in this study.

Significant findings

The optimum results showed 24.8% reduction in the total annual cost of the CCHPWH system using a gas engine as prime mover as compared with a gas turbine. In addition, the exergy efficiency of the cogeneration system in the optimal state for the prime mover of the gas turbine and the gas engine was obtained 31.21% and 45.58%, respectively. Finally, the optimal results in different cases were compared and results were discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
14.00%
发文量
362
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers (formerly known as Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers) publishes original works, from fundamental principles to practical applications, in the broad field of chemical engineering with special focus on three aspects: Chemical and Biomolecular Science and Technology, Energy and Environmental Science and Technology, and Materials Science and Technology. Authors should choose for their manuscript an appropriate aspect section and a few related classifications when submitting to the journal online.
期刊最新文献
Cellulose nanocrystals/zeolitic imidazolate framework-L (CNCs/ZIF-L) composites for loading and diffusion-controlled release of doxorubicin hydrochloride Optimization and sensitivity analysis of magnetic fields on nanofluid flow on a wedge with machine learning techniques with joule heating, radiation and viscous dissipation Biochar from residues of anaerobic digestion and its application as electrocatalyst in Zn–air batteries Decoration of mesoporous hydroxyapatite nanorods by CdSe and PtO nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic oxidation of antibiotic pollutant in water Fabrication of tannic acid-(3-amino)propyltriethoxysilane with zwitterionic carbon quantum dots coating on cellulose acetate tubular membrane for oil-water emulsion separation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1