改善病人护理的研究与目标。

Q Medicine Forschende Komplementarmedizin Pub Date : 1998-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000057330
Edwards
{"title":"改善病人护理的研究与目标。","authors":"Edwards","doi":"10.1159/000057330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of this article is to raise issues associated with the underlying assumptions of our research approaches and the nature of health/disease in conventional medical care and complementary and alternative medical care. Different types of efficacy are discussed in terms of randomized controlled trials and outcomes research. The demands of different audiences for research results suggest that researchers need to carefully specify the research question in the context of the state-of-the-knowledge. Appropriate matching of the study design, the nature of the disease, the nature of the treatment and what is known is essential to designing and implementing research that actually could improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54318,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":"5 Suppl S1 ","pages":"116-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000057330","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research and the Goal of Improving Patient Care.\",\"authors\":\"Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000057330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The goal of this article is to raise issues associated with the underlying assumptions of our research approaches and the nature of health/disease in conventional medical care and complementary and alternative medical care. Different types of efficacy are discussed in terms of randomized controlled trials and outcomes research. The demands of different audiences for research results suggest that researchers need to carefully specify the research question in the context of the state-of-the-knowledge. Appropriate matching of the study design, the nature of the disease, the nature of the treatment and what is known is essential to designing and implementing research that actually could improve patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin\",\"volume\":\"5 Suppl S1 \",\"pages\":\"116-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000057330\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000057330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000057330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是提出与我们的研究方法的基本假设以及传统医疗保健和补充和替代医疗保健中健康/疾病的本质相关的问题。从随机对照试验和结局研究两方面讨论了不同类型的疗效。不同受众对研究结果的需求表明,研究人员需要在知识状态的背景下仔细指定研究问题。研究设计的适当匹配,疾病的性质,治疗的性质和已知的东西是设计和实施研究的关键,这些研究实际上可以改善病人的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research and the Goal of Improving Patient Care.

The goal of this article is to raise issues associated with the underlying assumptions of our research approaches and the nature of health/disease in conventional medical care and complementary and alternative medical care. Different types of efficacy are discussed in terms of randomized controlled trials and outcomes research. The demands of different audiences for research results suggest that researchers need to carefully specify the research question in the context of the state-of-the-knowledge. Appropriate matching of the study design, the nature of the disease, the nature of the treatment and what is known is essential to designing and implementing research that actually could improve patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unusual claims, normative process: on the use and stringency of the scientific method. Prospective controlled cohort studies on long-term therapy of cervical cancer patients with a mistletoe preparation (Iscador). Supportive evidence for the anticancerous potential of alternative medicine against hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. [Repeated cold water stimulations (hydrotherapy according to Kneipp) in patients with COPD]. [Evaluation of use of complementary and alternative medicine by schizophrenic patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1