{"title":"里根执政时期非营利组织的应对方式。","authors":"S F Liebschutz","doi":"10.1002/nml.4130020405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contrary to expectations that a divested federal role would lead to the demise of nonprofit agencies, the relationship between nonprofit and government sectors in New York at the end of the 1980s was stronger than ever. This article presents longitudinal data for six nonprofit agencies in Rochester, New York, to demonstrate \"management by groping along\" during the Reagan years, behavior that resulted in increased reliance on state and local governments for funds and programs and in different ways of doing business.</p>","PeriodicalId":47683,"journal":{"name":"Nonprofit Management & Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/nml.4130020405","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coping by nonprofit organizations during the Reagan years.\",\"authors\":\"S F Liebschutz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nml.4130020405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contrary to expectations that a divested federal role would lead to the demise of nonprofit agencies, the relationship between nonprofit and government sectors in New York at the end of the 1980s was stronger than ever. This article presents longitudinal data for six nonprofit agencies in Rochester, New York, to demonstrate \\\"management by groping along\\\" during the Reagan years, behavior that resulted in increased reliance on state and local governments for funds and programs and in different ways of doing business.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonprofit Management & Leadership\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/nml.4130020405\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonprofit Management & Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130020405\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonprofit Management & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130020405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coping by nonprofit organizations during the Reagan years.
Contrary to expectations that a divested federal role would lead to the demise of nonprofit agencies, the relationship between nonprofit and government sectors in New York at the end of the 1980s was stronger than ever. This article presents longitudinal data for six nonprofit agencies in Rochester, New York, to demonstrate "management by groping along" during the Reagan years, behavior that resulted in increased reliance on state and local governments for funds and programs and in different ways of doing business.
期刊介绍:
Nonprofit Management and Leadership (NML) publishes the field''s best conceptual advances in understanding management, leadership, or governance of private nonprofit organizations. Each issue of NML offers readers the authoritative insights of top scholars on the common concerns of nonprofit managers, leaders, and boards in all private nonprofit settings, including social services, the arts, education, foundations, community development, religion, and member associations. The journal publishes full research monographs up to 10,000 words, and research notes up to 5,500 words. All research methods and approaches are welcome, so long as authors can articulate substantial advances in knowledge relevant to the field and implications for practice.