抑郁和焦虑症状临床水平个体的抑制控制

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Spanish Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2021-03-22 DOI:10.1017/SJP.2021.18
María B García-Martín, Francisco J Ruiz, Luna Bedoya-Valderrama, Miguel A Segura-Vargas, Andrés Peña-Vargas, Jorge E Ávila-Campos, Juan F Gómez-Bermúdez, Vanessa Calle-Arciniegas
{"title":"抑郁和焦虑症状临床水平个体的抑制控制","authors":"María B García-Martín,&nbsp;Francisco J Ruiz,&nbsp;Luna Bedoya-Valderrama,&nbsp;Miguel A Segura-Vargas,&nbsp;Andrés Peña-Vargas,&nbsp;Jorge E Ávila-Campos,&nbsp;Juan F Gómez-Bermúdez,&nbsp;Vanessa Calle-Arciniegas","doi":"10.1017/SJP.2021.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has shown that individuals suffering from depression and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) seem to have inhibitory control deficits compared with healthy controls. However, few studies have been conducted in Spanish-speaking countries. Thus, this study aims to analyze the performance on the Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) between groups of Colombian participants with clinical levels of depression and GAD symptoms and a nonclinical control group. According to previous research, we expected to find significant differences in inhibitory control among groups. An ex post facto design was implemented. The SCWT was administered to a total sample of 105 individuals (64.8% women, M = 22.94 years, SD = 4.62), including 27 depressed and 15 anxious participants according to their scores on the Personal Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, respectively. Bayesian t-tests showed that depressed participants showed the same processing speed but lower scores on inhibitory control than healthy controls, BF = 13.70, δ = 0.50, 95% CI [0.08, 0.94]. Conversely, anxious participants showed deficits in processing speed, SCWT-Word: BF = 16.19, δ = 0.68, 95% CI [0.15, 1.24]; SCWT-Color: BF = 5.98, δ = 0.50, 95% CI [-0.01, 1.04], but not in inhibitory control compared with the nonanxious counterparts. This study provides preliminary evidence concerning the inhibitory control deficits in Colombian depressed individuals and processing speed deficits in those experiencing clinical levels of GAD symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":54309,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","volume":"24 ","pages":"e19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/SJP.2021.18","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhibitory Control in Individuals with Clinical Levels of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"María B García-Martín,&nbsp;Francisco J Ruiz,&nbsp;Luna Bedoya-Valderrama,&nbsp;Miguel A Segura-Vargas,&nbsp;Andrés Peña-Vargas,&nbsp;Jorge E Ávila-Campos,&nbsp;Juan F Gómez-Bermúdez,&nbsp;Vanessa Calle-Arciniegas\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/SJP.2021.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous research has shown that individuals suffering from depression and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) seem to have inhibitory control deficits compared with healthy controls. However, few studies have been conducted in Spanish-speaking countries. Thus, this study aims to analyze the performance on the Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) between groups of Colombian participants with clinical levels of depression and GAD symptoms and a nonclinical control group. According to previous research, we expected to find significant differences in inhibitory control among groups. An ex post facto design was implemented. The SCWT was administered to a total sample of 105 individuals (64.8% women, M = 22.94 years, SD = 4.62), including 27 depressed and 15 anxious participants according to their scores on the Personal Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, respectively. Bayesian t-tests showed that depressed participants showed the same processing speed but lower scores on inhibitory control than healthy controls, BF = 13.70, δ = 0.50, 95% CI [0.08, 0.94]. Conversely, anxious participants showed deficits in processing speed, SCWT-Word: BF = 16.19, δ = 0.68, 95% CI [0.15, 1.24]; SCWT-Color: BF = 5.98, δ = 0.50, 95% CI [-0.01, 1.04], but not in inhibitory control compared with the nonanxious counterparts. This study provides preliminary evidence concerning the inhibitory control deficits in Colombian depressed individuals and processing speed deficits in those experiencing clinical levels of GAD symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"e19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/SJP.2021.18\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.18\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

先前的研究表明,与健康对照组相比,患有抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的个体似乎存在抑制控制缺陷。然而,在西班牙语国家进行的研究很少。因此,本研究旨在分析具有临床抑郁和广泛性焦虑症症状的哥伦比亚参与者与非临床对照组在Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT)上的表现。根据之前的研究,我们期望发现各组间抑制控制的显著差异。实现了一个事后设计。根据个人健康问卷-9和广泛性焦虑障碍-7的得分,对105人(64.8%为女性,M = 22.94岁,SD = 4.62)实施SCWT,包括27名抑郁参与者和15名焦虑参与者。贝叶斯t检验显示,抑郁组加工速度与健康组相同,但抑制控制得分低于健康组,BF = 13.70, δ = 0.50, 95% CI[0.08, 0.94]。相反,焦虑被试在处理速度上表现出缺陷,SCWT-Word: BF = 16.19, δ = 0.68, 95% CI [0.15, 1.24];SCWT-Color: BF = 5.98, δ = 0.50, 95% CI[-0.01, 1.04],但与非焦虑对照组相比,没有抑制对照组。本研究为哥伦比亚抑郁症患者的抑制控制缺陷和临床水平的广泛性焦虑症患者的处理速度缺陷提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inhibitory Control in Individuals with Clinical Levels of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms.

Previous research has shown that individuals suffering from depression and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) seem to have inhibitory control deficits compared with healthy controls. However, few studies have been conducted in Spanish-speaking countries. Thus, this study aims to analyze the performance on the Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) between groups of Colombian participants with clinical levels of depression and GAD symptoms and a nonclinical control group. According to previous research, we expected to find significant differences in inhibitory control among groups. An ex post facto design was implemented. The SCWT was administered to a total sample of 105 individuals (64.8% women, M = 22.94 years, SD = 4.62), including 27 depressed and 15 anxious participants according to their scores on the Personal Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, respectively. Bayesian t-tests showed that depressed participants showed the same processing speed but lower scores on inhibitory control than healthy controls, BF = 13.70, δ = 0.50, 95% CI [0.08, 0.94]. Conversely, anxious participants showed deficits in processing speed, SCWT-Word: BF = 16.19, δ = 0.68, 95% CI [0.15, 1.24]; SCWT-Color: BF = 5.98, δ = 0.50, 95% CI [-0.01, 1.04], but not in inhibitory control compared with the nonanxious counterparts. This study provides preliminary evidence concerning the inhibitory control deficits in Colombian depressed individuals and processing speed deficits in those experiencing clinical levels of GAD symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spanish Journal of Psychology
Spanish Journal of Psychology Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Psychology is published with the aim of promoting the international dissemination of relevant empirical research and theoretical and methodological proposals in the various areas of specialization within psychology. The first Spanish journal with an international scope published entirely in English.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised (SCS-R) in Spanish Adolescents in Residential Care. (Mis)perception in Social Mobility: Optimistic Bias for Personal (but not Societal) Mobility Beliefs. Gender Matters: A Critical Piece in Mental Health. Exploring Comorbidity Between Anxiety and Depression in Spanish-Speaking School-Aged Children: A Network Analysis Approach. Athlete Portraits in News: Influence of Media Representation and Gender on Social Perception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1